User talk:Zo world

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kangpokpi district, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Motbung. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kangpokpi district, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chandel district. - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mimin kanggui, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Introduction to referencing
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Kautilya3 (talk) 15:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zou language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuki. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mimin kanggui. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Motbung, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mimim kanggui, in this edit, you have corrupted the census data of Moreh, by removing the Meitei language and inflating the Thadou language. This serious WP:disruptive editing. If you do this kind of thing again, you will be indefinitely blocked. (I notice that you have already had a two-week block for adding unsourced content. This is more of the same.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mimin kanggui. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Motbung".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zo world! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Thadou people several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Thadou people, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thadou people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thadou people, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced information. Repeatedly adding it over and over (while dishonestly calling it a minor edit: [1]), is edit warring, which is not allowed. Several people have removed it before, and the way you are doing it is also deceptive. I can see several warnings above for this, and you've completely ignored them.

If you carry on, I will simply report you at WP:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents, and you may find yourself blocked. If you want to add the information you're claiming is true, provide sources. Theknightwho (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Kuki–Paite Conflict. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Zo world and WP:NPOV. Thank you. Theknightwho (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 03:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you repeatedly add edit summaries like and for reference please check latest news that highlights myanmar conflict, that shows that you have a profound misunderstanding of Wikipedia's core content policy of Verifiability. It is inappropriate for you to instruct other editors to go searching for reliable sources. Instead, it is your obligation to find those sources, format them properly as references, and add them to the articles. Cullen328 (talk) 03:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve added information which have real updates and sources and yes I’m new to the page and I see that there are some oldies who just wants to remove my articles just because i didn’t provide current updates but I’m a person who wants to provide updates on the basis of things would I have encountered and which are being ignore my this platform, it dosnt mean if it’s not highlighted here by the rest, it necessarily dosnt mean it’s wrong, this is a platform to update things and some things are new so you might not know the sources but it always don’t have to be wrong, or remove, if you keep removing it , how would the world know, what’s right and wrong. Zo world (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The world knows what’s right and wrong when you, not some other imaginary editor, provide a properly formatted reference to a reliable source verifying the specific content. This is your obligation. Do you understand that? Cullen328 (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]