User talk:Yuuuu1000

Do you need me to show you the articles where lu says that the bodhisattva speaks through him? If he is not claiming to be representation of the bodhisattva, why will he say this?Ccctttttt (talk) 11:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And when they say help to improve, that's because there are people related to lu who is providing a single sided view of him. Ccctttttt (talk) 11:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC) As for the cult, if you check the references, these provinces did listed Guanyin citta as a cult. But I did not say guanyin citta is universally a cult. I'll remove the forum reference though later.Ccctttttt (talk) 11:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements is based on valid reasons. I do not see why 'speaking to bodhisattva' shows thaat he is representative of bodhisattva?

If I'm speaking on your behalf, doesn't that mean that I am representing you? Similarly, if he claims that he is speaking on behalf of the bodhisattva, that also means that he is claiming to represent the bodhisattva. Furthermore when people call him a reincarnation of the bodhisattva, he has never debuted but instead received it with glee. Such incidents had occurred in history several times and in each case they passed on immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccctttttt (talk • contribs) 11:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Jun Hong Lu. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]