User talk:Xxhanxxx

Hello, Xxhanxxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ikram Akhtar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• || ''[[No Problem (2010 film)|No Problem]]'' [[File:No Problem Movie Wallpaper 43.jpeg|150px]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Xxhanxxx,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Actor Factors for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 18:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ek Baar Chale Aao, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijay Dahiphale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijay Dahiphale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Vijay Dahiphale. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mirza azhar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 14:09, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xxhanxxx

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kabbir Khan for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kabbir Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:C1D4:B583:78C3:DAE4 (talk) 16:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent item has been moved to draftspace. It is not ready for publication. Please review the following pages: WP:YFA, WP:MOS, WP:BLP and WP:REFB. Biographical articles cannot be accepted without adequate sourcing. Please develop in draft and do not move to main without a great deal of improvement or it will be rejected or possibly deleted. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i've edited it please check it once and help me to improve thanks Xxhanxxx (talk) 11:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ikram Akhtar Films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ikram Akhtar Films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AmusingWeasel (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kabbir Khan (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Single source in article is about a filming location, only lists subject's name. BEFORE found promo, interviews, nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC) There is an Indian film director named Kabir Khan (director) and an athlete Kabir Khan (cricketer) that should not be confused with the subject.  // Timothy :: talk  21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kabbir Khan (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kabbir Khan (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  22:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per your request for help in your recent edit summary [1], here are some resources to answer your questions.

• If you are connected to the subject in any way (or are the subject of the article) this must be disclosed clearly on your user page. Wikipedia welcomes input from article subjects and associates, but there are special rules regarding how these contributions are reviewed.
• Please read WP:COI, WP:NPOV, and WP:OR, WP:WEIGHT. (neutrality)
• Then read WP:N, and for biographies read WP:BIO, WP:BLP. For other types of article see WP:SNG; here is a list of SNGs Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines (notability).
• Finally read: WP:V, WP:IS, WP:RS, and WP:SIGCOV (sourcing).

Any questions you have can be answered at the WP:TEAHOUSE.

If you are going to edit Wikipedia, especially creating biographies, you need at a minimum to undestand the above. It will take time to learn them, but the time will be well spent.

Greetings from Los Angeles,  // Timothy :: talk  23:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xxhanxxx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kabbir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xxhanxxx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kabbir".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]