User talk:Wpiki

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rick Perry, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of the "3 revert rule" on Wikipedia. You appear to have violated the rule, and anyone who wishes to could likely file a report at WP:AN/EW. Cheers. Collect (talk) 00:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Rick Perry, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. This article is about Rick Perry, not the Texas legislature. SummerPhD (talk) 03:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Rick Perry, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 04:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to WP:EW, you are warned that further edit warring on the Rick Perry aricle may be reported at WP:AN/EW. Cheers. Collect (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Rick Perry shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Fat&Happy (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wpiki. You have new messages at WP:EAR.
Message added 19:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Danger ^{High voltage!} 19:01, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Swarm ^X11|11|11 19:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Wpiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Wpiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Edit warring: Rick Perry

• Blocking administrator: Swarm (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Procedural decline - the unblock-auto template is for blocks of IP addresses, not of individual users. You are blocked directly, not autoblocked. However, before you submit a standard unblock request, I'd like to point out that your reasoning below won't fly. Whether your edits are correct or not has absolutely zero bearing on WP:Edit warring. Being (or thinking you are) right doesn't give you a free license to ignore this policy. An unblock of an edit warring block is contingent on you agreeing not to continue the behavior that got you blocked, thus making the block unnecessary. - Vianello (Talk) 20:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I post revelant information concerning Rick Perry's fiscal policies. Numerous editors keep deleting this revelant information which only pertains to Rick Perry not his predecessors. The facts are clearly in my footnotes! Those fiscal policies have nothing to do with previous pay as you governors. This fact should not be deleted for it shows the consequence of fiscal policies dependant on debt. Perry very much supported the use of bonds and not the pay as you method of his predecessors. He had 2 choices, do not spend or raise taxes to cover spending. Wpiki (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)wpiki[reply]