User talk:WorkD737

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bewoork and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WorkDraft! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bewoork, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.bewoork.com/ourproj.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.bewoork.com/ourproj.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Bewoork may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there can you restore the page? I will change some information... thanks Kylie WorkDraft (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the (since deleted) talk page you wrote:

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --WorkDraft (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are doing the best as we can to make the people believe in this new platform. This platform has been designed to help a lot of new companies in the United Kingdom. We are WorkDraft Studio, and we have all copyright rights to write information about a platform made by our company. Bewoork.com is property of WorkDraft Studio, based in Slough. Please review our page... Sincerely,

Francesco

There were two things wrong with the draft. 1. Copyright concerns, and 2. Advertising concerns.

1. Regarding copyright; as you assert you are the copyright holder of the content that was taken from the website, you (theoretically) could release that content and allow Wikipedia to use it. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for a description of the process. However, I don't recommend that in this instance as the material is not suitable for an encyclopedia. See point 2.
2. The second problem is that you are attempting to use Wikipedia to advertise or promote your platform. Wikipedia is not the place for advertising. Wikipedia looks down on people trying to use it as a place to, in your words, "make people believe in" products, services, religious ideas, etc.

As the content of the page was not acceptable, I have deleted it. There is an additional issue, in that your username is a violation of our username policy. I will be blocking this account accordingly. Please read the block notice, which will give you information on how to change your username should you want to use this account to contribute information that complies with our policies and guidelines. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kylie can you delete my account? Thanks WorkDraft (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WorkDraft (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not KylieTastic, but neither of us can delete your account. For reasons of attribution for copyright, Wikipedia accounts can not be deleted. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:46, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, WorkDraft, does not comply with Wikipedia's username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy, which is summarized below.

Under Wikipedia's username policy, a username should represent an individual person. It should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights, being a "bot" account (unless approved), or implying that the account has any administrative or "moderator" user rights, or any kind of "power" or "authority" over other users); nor be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of an organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company". Among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy on paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:31, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WorkD737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

editwork356 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Your reason here WorkDraft (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The name's OK, but your request isn't addressing the other issues behind the block: What is your relationship to Bewoork? If we unblock you, what else will you edit about if you can't edit about BeWoork? — Daniel Case (talk) 07:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel

We are the company that made bewoork.com, we would only indicate the details and the history of the platform. This platform will help thousand of companies in the UK's.

Please unlock us,

Sincerely

WorkDraft Studio WorkDraft (talk) 07:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now we are making a lot of updates on our platform to indicate to the people how it works, and we will be glad to indicate this crucial information on wikipedia.

Thanks again,

WorkDraft Studio WorkDraft (talk) 07:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorkD737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Now we are making a lot of updates on our platform to indicate to the people how it works, and we will be glad to indicate this crucial information on wikipedia. Thanks again. WorkDraft Studio WorkDraft (talk) 06:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't want you doing that. That's for you to do on your own website and social media, not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources state about topics that meet our criteria, not what a topic wants to say about itself. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia more generally in areas unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what you will contribute about. 331dot (talk) 06:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorkD737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We don't want to promote bewoork.com we would only to describe it and it's story. All things and words will be different than the website. If you don't think that we can do something for bewoork.com, please delete this account. Sincerely. WorkDraft Studio - Before saying something else, please see: https://www.bewoork.com/why.html , maybe you will understand why this could be important. WorkDraft (talk) 18:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Again, we don't want you doing that. And sorry, accounts cannot be deleted. Yamla (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorkD737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We are a respectful company, we would insert information that are not just stories or informations already written on a website about our web platform bewoork.com, but things that can explain to people the importance of this platform, and the impact of bewoork.com in a nearly future to the society... We are asking to Wikipedia&Wikimedia to unlock our account and leave to us the possibility to publish this article. Thanks WorkDraft (talk) 3:10 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

As you do not recognize or acknowledge your promotional edits, you will not be unblocked to write about your company. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not the place to tell people about your company. Your company's website is for that. Please describe what constructive edits unrelated to your company wyou would make. It looks like you still need to request a new username. per WP:CORPNAME "Because Wikipedia's policy is that usernames should not be shared between more than one individual, the following types of usernames are not permitted because they imply shared use:

• Usernames that are simply names of companies or groups are not permitted (these also fall under Promotional names).
• Personal usernames that imply shared access, such as "Jack and Jill", are not permitted.
• Usernames that are names of posts within organizations, such as "Secretary of the XY Foundation", are not permitted, as such a post may be held by different persons at different times.
• However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WorkD737 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, as asked by a Wikipedia administrator/moderator we've changed our account name to respect the Wikimedia&Wikipedia guidelines. So, we can be unlocked? Thanks WorkD737 (talk) 16:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think we're getting anywhere here. The owner of this account clearly does not understand the nature or the purpose of Wikipedia. "we would create a page about bewoork.com". "I know this website is...made for companies" -- no, it exactly isn't that. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That resolves the username issue, but not your promotional edits. You won't be unblocked to edit about your company, so we need to know what edits you will make instead. You're also making this worse by indicating multiple people have access to this account(by using "we"). 331dot (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WorkD737 (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Okay, let me explain! I'm requesting to unlock my account to be able to edit or publish new pages on Wikipedia. About the using of "we", this is a mistake that I've made while writing fastly. Oh, If I remember correctly if I'm a figure that I recognise myself as "we", because I'm a LGBTQ, this cannot be written?! That's not my case, but you have to consider your words before reply or follow the guidelines as a bible. Anyway, we would create a page about bewoork.com, I know that this website is a web platform, made for companies and users, and I'm aware about his low virility due to the emerging of it, but as you or other moderators written I'm not authorised to write about it. But if this is true why there's public pages on wikipedia about pc software that run for less than a year, or about web platform like search engine or call center services? So let me know why some can and others don't. Have a nice weekend. --WorkD737 (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't indicate that "we" referred to you personally and you represent a business, so I thought you were talking about a group. I apologize.

That an article exists does not mean that it meets our guidelines. It may simply be not addressed yet. Wikipedia is not a database of things that exist, and is not a place for businesses to tell about themselves and their offerings. Articles are typically written by independent editors.

Jpgordon I think they were referring to their own website as "made for companies", not Wikipedia, but your point remains correct. 331dot (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WorkD737 (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Okay, I respect your choice. Thanks in any case. --WorkD737 (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]