You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nailya Alexander Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qono (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Mary Augusta Hiester Reid.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Mary Augusta Hiester Reid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi WomenArtistUpdates—I'm curious about something. It looks like you initiated the article Nailya Alexander Gallery. As it is being considered for deletion, I'm wondering why you haven't weighed in to that discussion. Have you changed your mind about the viability of the article? Bus stop (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bus stop - I think the Nailya Alexander Gallery is noteworthy, specifically as a venue for Russian avant-garde photography. The reason I wrote the article was because the gallery was mentioned in quite a few artists' wiki articles. I really appreciate your support for the article along with Randy Kryn, NotButtigieg, and J947. I don't understand how the article got relisted when there were no requests for deletion. I thought being the author of the article would imply Keep !vote. Should I vote for my own article? Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi WomenArtistUpdates. If you are so inclined you might cast a vote but of course it's not really just a "vote" as reasoning is expected to accompany it. You might want to take a quick glance at Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Bus stop (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Followup. You don't have to weigh in. It is contentious thing. And what it comes down to is significant coverage of the gallery itself, which doesn't seem to be available. I see that several of the artists (photographers) represented by the gallery have articles of their own on Wiki. Thanks for initiating the article, whatever the outcome of the deletion discussion. Bus stop (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Bus stop, Thank you for the useful link to Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Very informative and also convinced me it is best for me to stay out of the fray. And thank you again for your work on the the article. It will be interesting to see the final outcome. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi WomenArtistUpdates—Thank you. Yes, it is at a weird stage. And to tell you the truth I too want to distance myself from it. Too contentious. I have been having these arguments for a long time over art gallery articles. They tend not to be sourced in the way that satisfies wiki policy on business entities. Bus stop (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Gladys Morrell.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Gladys Morrell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Helena Smith Dayton.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Helena Smith Dayton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
replaced with a much more flattering, and PD image.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Ana Marija Marović.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Ana Marija Marović.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
added image back into article. deleted as part of a single swipe clean-up of article. photo still legit.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:29, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Constance Forsyth.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Constance Forsyth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
article on Constance Forsyth was created by now banned Dante8 years ago and was deleted along with hundreds of other articles. Consequently, uploaded photo became an orphan. Not necessarily worth recreating. Source material slim. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sorry for bothering you, but...
New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Felicia Meyer.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Felicia Meyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
fair use self portrait already in article. Much better. This should be deleted. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Frigga Carlberg.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Frigga Carlberg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi WomenArtistUpdates! You created a thread called English article on Japanese artist at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.
Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
National Serigraph Society
Thank you for creating the article on the National Serigraph Society! I've been meaning to get around to it for a long time, along with several similar pages. —Atvelonis (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Atvelonis! I have become very interested in the mid century printmaking phenomenon. In the course of my research I went to the Archives of American Art, where they had a wonderful collection of the NSS newsletters. The artists were very proactive in building a market for selling their own work and also willing to share ideas with each other. They sold subscriptions where the average person could get prints on a regular basis. Can you imagine the collections?
I created the article for Atelier 17, which had previously been a redirect to Stanley William Hayter. I want figure out how to write an article on the 1940 MoMA show American Color Prints Under $10. What is on your to-do list? Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Various... the Public Use of Arts Committee for one, and specific artists like Hyman Warsager. The Creative Printmakers Group that Anthony Velonis and Warsager co-founded in 1939 too (I think it lasted until 1949, although I have not confirmed this), which printed works by various artists. Unfortunately, it's pretty hard to find information on that. I know that Vincent Longo and Jackson Pollock were both somehow involved, as were Adolf Dehn (example) and Federico Castallano. Very tangentially related groups like the Society of Glass and Ceramic Decorators, although I'm not sure if that qualifies for an article. Perhaps even an article on the Art and Progress magazine (which I think is the same as the Magazine of Art or American Magazine of Art, but I don't know which title would be best). I've done no substantial research or source analysis here, so for the time being it's all just a bunch of new paths! —Atvelonis (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Atvelonis, the Public Use of Arts Committee looks very interesting. I ran into a mention of it when I was working on the article on Ruth Chaney. I don't see too much on the web, but if there were a membership list somewhere... WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
For sure. It looks like there is a journal article that talks about the Public Use of Arts Committee a fair bit, titled "Subway Art and the Public Use of Arts Committee." If I'm not misreading it, it would seem that it cites (pg 3) Paul Block, Robert Cronbach, Doris Kravis, Ruth Chaney, Ida Abelman, and Joseph Konzal as "core members," along with four-ish others. This strange document calls the organization Communist (??) but lists a few people who were either members, or somehow connected to it: Michael Quill, Vito Marcantonio, Abram Flaxer, Roswell Kent, and Lewis Merrill (presumably not this one). This document from the Museum of Modern Art refers to some art that the Comittee was associated with. A book titled Subway City: Riding the Trains, Reading New York talks about it a bit too (pg 151), probably relying on the Harrison article. (There are probably more sources out there, but I haven't done a super deep dive of JSTOR, Google Books, etc. yet, just a very quick skim.) —Atvelonis (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Replaceable fair use File:Casper Women’s Club House.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Casper Women’s Club House.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Anna Molka Ahmed.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Anna Molka Ahmed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
https://www.concordia.ca/offices/archives/honorary-degree-recipients/2019/June/gilles-mihalcean.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.15.75.173 (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Photo of Maliheh Afnan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Maliheh Afnan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
replaced this fair use photo. there was an issue with dead link out to the source.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Photograph of Maliheh Afnan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photograph of Maliheh Afnan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
request for deletion declined. photo stays WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Maliheh Afnan.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Maliheh Afnan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Concerted effort to remove any image. Not worth pursuing.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Leolinda Daltro.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Leolinda Daltro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Portrait of Margaret Day Blake.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Margaret Day Blake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
note to self - replaced with a much more flattering PD photograph.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 15:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Josephine D. Heard.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Josephine D. Heard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your thread has been archived
Hi WomenArtistUpdates! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikidata question, request for help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.
The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Susie Rayos Marmon.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Susie Rayos Marmon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
note to self - awaiting article to be on DKN before adding photo. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Charlotte Reeve Conover.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Charlotte Reeve Conover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note to self - replaced with PD image WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Adella Brown Bailey.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Adella Brown Bailey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Florence M. Sterling.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Florence M. Sterling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Photo of Jill Messick.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Photo of Jill Messick.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Note - Non-free images from commercial photo agencies are almost never accepted. See WP:GETTY. They are assumed to run afoul of WP:NFCC#2 as these agencies primary business is licensing the images. -- Whpq (talk) 19:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for the speedy reply and guidance Whpq. I will not repeat the error. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red| October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Faison Shaw.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
note self - replaced with PD image WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Caroline Armington 1930.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Caroline Armington 1930.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
note to self - replaced with PD image WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Addition of Wangari Maathai to the notable women activist list
Wangari Maathai is well known for her fight for the green belt movement in Kenya. She is the 1st African woman to receive a nobel peace prize but has not been mentioned? please add her to the list Welovewomen (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Photo of Ida Caroline Eugenie Peelen.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Photo of Ida Caroline Eugenie Peelen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks for uploading File:Anne Tabachnick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
note to self: replaced by supposed PD image. fair use image extracted from https://hyperallergic.com/178124/enigmas-of-the-visible-paintings-by-anne-tabachnick/ Article and image updated by single topic new user claiming the PD photograph is "own work" created this year. Watch file and replace if/when PD image is challenged Anne Tabachnick portraitWomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
.jpg/1280px-George_Bellows_-_North_River_(1908).jpg)
.jpg/1280px-Valentines_Candy_2009_(cropped).jpg)
Done WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
