User talk:Wikicat1410

April 2024

Hello, I'm The Master of Hedgehogs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to A Tale of Magic... have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^{(hate that hedgehog!)} 17:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was not constructive Wikicat1410 (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ozma of Oz. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ozma of Oz was changed by Wikicat1410 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908371 on 2024-04-08T22:29:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What edit was not constructive I just added more details Wikicat1410 (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Princess Ozma, you may be blocked from editing. TheEpTic (talk) 18:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Land_of_Oz.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicat1410 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i added more details to the land of oz and a tale a magic I did not vandalize any page Wikicat1410 (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear vandalism from this account with almost all your contributions reverted. Yamla (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicat1410 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not vandalize any page but my changes for some reason have been classified as vandalism even though I checked wikipedias policy and none of my edits fit that description please unban me and explain why my changes were tagged as vandalism and how to add more context or details without it being classified as vandalismWikicat1410 (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you don't seem to recognize how your edits were disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts at the bottom. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicat1410 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok sorry for changing the photo on the princess ozma wiki to something else fine that’s vandalism but I do not understand why all my changes that have either added more details or context were reverted maybe look at the changes most of them are not vandalismWikicat1410 (talk) 23:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You added that the ruler of the land of Oz was "oz" in lower case. This was not vandalism, but was not a good edit. In your next unblock request, you should say what edits you want to make, if unblocked. Also, please post your unblock requests at the bottom of the page. PhilKnight (talk) 19:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikicat1410 (talk) 23:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicat1410 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t edit anymore because all my edits that add more context or details seem to keep getting reverted I’ll just make my own pages because trying to add more context or details often get wrongfully flagged as vandalism Wikicat1410 (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. Since this is basically your fourth variation on this theme, it is time to revoke your access to this page since it's just not a productive use of our time or yours to keep fielding these. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to place your unblock requests in the middle of the page, even after you were told to place them at the bottom, isn't helping your case that WP:CIR does not apply. --Yamla (talk) 20:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I’m new to Wikipedia and I do not know how to put them at the bottom of the page Wikicat1410 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't intend to make edits, there is no need to unblock you as blocks only prevent editing. If you aren't going to edit right now, you should withdraw your request. You are welcome to make one later when you want to edit. You will not be allowed to just fool around "creating your own pages"; you need to tell us how you want to contribute to building this encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 12:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not fooling around I added important context and/or details to wikis of books I’m interested in but most of them got reverted but I did not know why and then I got banned for “vandalism”. Wikicat1410 (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]