User talk:Wendybelcher

Welcome!

Hello, Wendybelcher, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Is this where I can ask a question regarding the removal of some of my edits?

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kristos Samra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wendybelcher, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristos Samra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of List of open access journals. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 22:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wendybelcher/sandbox sub-page can be User:Wendybelcher/Walatta Petros and you can make additional named sub-pages Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 16:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wendy. I see that Hubbard is used as a source for the 14th century date in its article. Doug Weller talk 16:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug. The hubbard dissertation is very old, 1950s. There has been lots of controversy about the date, so only the more recent sources are correct.

Hello, Wendybelcher. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wendybelcher, great article but please fix the footnote formatting. Do not write footnotes just as "article name", please instead use the coding shown at WP:REFB to make automated linked footnotes. That way your footnotes will appear as little blue clickable links, making the article much more organized. I have fixed a few examples for you, please contact me on my Talk page if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks MatthewVanitas. My student worked on this, it is her article, I think she got everything straightened out.[reply]

I've deleted this as an advertisement. It is not considered acceptable to start a WP article with the copy and paste of what appears to be an advertisement, even as a user draft. In any case, such a draft gives the impression of having been copied from an outside source, and this is never permitted except for public domain sources. 'll be glad to help you further, but I cannot as a responsible administrator here let such content remain in Wikipedia. The usual way of dealing with this is to do the initial drafting of the article off Wikipedia. DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 30 November 2016 (UTC) . DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see your student has now replaced this with an adequate article under a variant title, Nigerian fashion. I'm glad it has ended this well. I'll be glad to help you or your students with anything you need here. (As it happens, I retired from the Princeton Library about 10 years ago, as Biological Sciences Bibliographer. I've been working on Wikipedia as a volunteer ever since.) DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DGG, we are still learning, especially this student. However, can you move this entry from Nigerian fashion to Fashion in Nigeria, since that is the more common way of putting this? And then redirect from Nigerian fashion? See Fashion in the Soviet Union, etc.--WLBelcher (talk) 15:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

done. DGG ( talk ) 06:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Ufahamu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Randykitty (talk) 23:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wendybelcher. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:1947-48 French West Africa Railway Strike, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1947-48 French West Africa Railway Strike and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:1947-48 French West Africa Railway Strike during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wendy, thank you for your message, which was rather misplaced.

Please take the time to familiarize yourself with Help:Talk pages. A useful guide is found at Wikipedia:Tutorial/Talk pages, part of the tutorial which was linked here on your user talk page way back in 2012, and has been here ever since.

Talk page discussion on the English Wikipedia follows existing Western -- and global -- convention regarding discussions, in that the earliest comments come first, and then successively later comments come later. Ramming a comment into the top of a discussion from more than a year earlier, forcing it on top of comments from three years ago, can be perceived as rude, and at any rate risks your comments not being seen by others.

Where an article, like Castle, has already undergone a featured article candidacy and been successful, and has already seen substantial talk page discussion regarding its focus and wording, then unilaterally changing the lede to accommodate some alternative focus and wording is not practical. If some new reliable sources that challenge the existing consensus have been found, then starting a New Section on the talk page to discuss their implications with other editors, is by far the best idea.

I'm also very confused by your suggestion that the article Castle in its current form is nationalist. MPS1992 (talk) 20:28, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wendybelcher. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you have a goat week!

Just learned i can send goats to people on wikipedia

Mlpollack (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too funny! --WLBelcher (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on College of Performing and Visual Arts, Addis Ababa University, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gay and Lesbian Organization of Witwatersrand. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gay and Lesbian Organization of Witwatersrand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Professor. Wikipedia appreciates your contributions to Wikipedia. I spent several semesters collaborating with professors bringing their classes to Wikipedia. However, your userpage should tell us about you, as a user. It should not look like an a biographic article. For that reason, I removed your promotional content. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help Chris Troutman! I wasn't sure how to format it. I will look, but if you have a good example of a user page, and want to give me the link, that would be great.--WLBelcher (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wendybelcher/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wendybelcher/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wendybelcher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Wendybelcher/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(I hope you don't mind me bringing this up in public. Sorry for taking so long.)

I see your reasoning. I've reverted my undo. Sorry for the trouble.──post by kenny2wiki ( Talk | Contribs ) 17:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at Kenny2wiki! I didn't explain it right so that was a good reminder. Also, I didn't carefully go through the information to make sure that it appears elsewhere in Wikipedia. I don't want to lose all that work! --WLBelcher (talk) 17:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]