User talk:Vif12vf

		A glass of Thandai for you
		Here is a glass of Thandai for you. Thandai is a traditional Indian cold drink prepared with a mixture of almonds, fennel seeds, watermelon kernels, rose petals, pepper, vetiver seeds, cardamom, saffron, milk and sugar. Thanks a lot for your efforts in fighting vandals. It will be helpful to you if you use WP:Twinkle. Because it provides several options that come handy and make it faster to revert vandalism. Try it, I hope you will like it. If you have any questions feel free to ping me. cheers and regards. Thank you. DBigXrayᗙ 17:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply] For more Indian dishes, visit the Kitchen of WikiProject India.

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good work with Twinkle, keeping Wikipedia free from Vandalism. Keep it up. Try WP:Stiki as well. cheers. DBigXrayᗙ 21:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Vif12vf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Meatsgains(talk) 01:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Hope the new year will bring more friendly debates and collaboration between us. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:53, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Nice work, comrade. puggo 00:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. puggo (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's socialism articles. Did you know there's a WikiProject for editors interested in writing about socialism? If you would like to join, simply click the Join WikiProject button on the WikiProject Socialism page. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the WikiProject Socialism talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! MarioGom (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Vif12vf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

	Page related issue
	Did you edit JanaSena page? Vikas4554 (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like this is a bit of a weird way to start a thread, but yes i did. I removed some recent unsourced additions implying a party merger! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you, and may you have a happy Diwali as well :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vif12vf. I saw on your page you have the userbox for "This user supports Autism and Asperger's awareness" and thought you might like to sign this - User:ThatPeskyCommoner/The Autie Pact. All the best. Helper201 (talk) 15:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, all the best to you and your family as well :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is not polite to change an editor's user space without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change after the 18th of January. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds good to me :) Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello, comrade. I appreciate your tenacity trying to change the absurd description of DPRK's regime. It's sort of ludicrous that people hide behind "consensus" on de jure definitions which would be easily accepted had the country been inside the USA's sphere of influence. Keds (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh um, thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for fixing my edit to Alaska Republicans, I accidentally edited an old version. Apologies. ^_^ Mycranthebigman (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, things happen :) Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Workers' Barnstar
		This user has shown great editing skills in improving articles related to Communism or Socialism.
		this WikiAward was given to Vif12vf by Yue🌙 on 07:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your nearly nine years of service improving articles related to communism or socialism on Wikipedia. Here's to another nine, and many more. 🍻 Yue🌙 07:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :D Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Packer&Tracker (remark) 17:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, happy new year 🥳 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon
	Hello, Vif12vf! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tiberius! Thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 04:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, thank you so much for fixing things after me, something I've noticed is that we tend to frequent same pages a lot. Thus I wanted to ask - would you be willing to talk somewhere such as Discord? I know you might have a lot going on, but if you had a tiny bit of time and wanted to meet someone new, then that'd be pawsome!

God bless, Comrade! <3 Brat Forelli (talk) 09:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that I have a lot going on, though this usually doesn't limit me that much, my introverted nature on the other hand really does. I'm sorry I haven't come back to you sooner, but I have been rather anxious about replying ever since I received your message. I am willing to connect on Discord, although I can't promise that I will have the confidence to speak right away. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 04:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Congratulations on being so prominent on my watchlist (Yugoslavia-related articles) and cheers for relentless anti-vandalism activity! :) –Vipz (talk) 04:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 😊 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this revert. I intended to WP:BANREVERT massive changes to the article made by a sock with CIR and POV issues, though I should've stated so in my edit summary. The infobox parameter for "now part of" also looked cluttered and wrong Kiu99 (talk) 03:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that clears it up. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:47, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vif12vf. I see you have been reverting edits from 2600:6C50:7EF0:4A70:AC5E:678F:2922:B2D1 in several places, calling them a sock. It's actually even worse than that: all their text is lifted straight from copyrighted sources. Compare my warnings on their talkpage. May I ask why you say they're a sock, though? Do you believe they're evading a block on an account? Bishonen | tålk 08:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

• I have encountered this person before, and last time I believe some of their IPs got blocked, although their IP-hopping is so extreme that it is quite frankly difficult to keep up with all of the IPs. The reason I consider it sockpuppetry though is because the IP-hopping is clearly a tactic to avoid capture, so to speak. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Special:Contributions/2600:6C50:7EF0:4A70::/64? Uncle G (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    What is this? Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's the contributions from 2600:6C50:7EF0:4A70:AC5E:678F:2922:B2D1's /64 range, in other words, it's more contributions from the same individual (a /64 range is just one person). I checked those before I wrote to Tiberius, Uncle G, admittedly a little superficially, but afaics, there weren't any copyvios there apart from the one IP I warned. I'm not sure about the socking - your explanation is a little vague, Tiberius - but the pasting of copyrighted material is very clear. Of course with an IPv6 you can never tell if they have seen or will see any warnings before they've moved on to another IP in the range - sigh - but I'll try to keep an eye on it. If there are more copyvios, I'll just block the range. Bishonen | tålk 16:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Ah that clears it up, thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not inject your unsourced opinion into articles, with made-up terminology like "official country" which is meaningless to everyone but you [1]. The lead there already perfectly adequately explains what the IoM is: "is a self-governing British Crown Dependency".  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  05:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You might have to re-check the revert I made, I introduced no such claim! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 06:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The dominican parties PLD & the PRM don't are center, i know the politics from my country Dominican Republic, in the case of the PRM that confirmed from his website^[1], the PLD is centerleft, never are centrists^[2]Oli (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you know yourself cannot be used on wikipedia, editors are not allowed to use themselves as sources. If our sources contradict your personal knowledge, then the actual sources always take precedence! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did I show you two links that prove what I said about the PRM and the PLD? Did you even read them first? Or did you only notice the first line of my first message and ignore the rest? Oli (talk) 05:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

>If you continue to use yourself and primary sources over over reliable third-party sources to support claims you make that make no sense, it will be considered disruptive editing!

I will take this message of yours as a threat, I am going to talk to a librarian about this, because it is evident that you are not going to want to debate about this, because you will file a complaint against me for permanent blocking for "disruptive editing", thank you. Oli (talk) 05:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is in no way a threat, that is how wikipedia works! You may never use yourself as a source, and primary sources for political parties can only be used for certain things, but are generally frowned upon. If you continuously use these when being told off for doing so, that is disruptive editing by definition, and something you may get banned for on wikipedia! This is no threat, this is just how editing here actually works! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 06:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you never wanted to debate, and I thank you for the new nickname you gave me "Edition Disruptor", I hope many more nice threats like that soon. Oli (talk) 06:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a threat, thinking so is beyond hysterical. Also if your edits are in violation of any editing policy or guideline, then yes, that is disruptive, possibly even vandalism when bad enough. And if you continue to make edits violating policy or guidelines, then sooner or later someone is actually going to have you reported or banned from editing. Wikipedia is not a free-for-all! Also when your sources don't meet criteria, there isn't really a discussion or debate to be had in the first place! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 06:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the new nickname "Hysterical Edition Disruptor". Very thanks. Oli (talk) 07:10, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Christmas Barnstar
	Awarded to you for your contributions on Christmas Day, because apparently you also have nothing better to do over the holidays than edit Wikipedia! Yue🌙 10:03, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 😅 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I came across Sistan page and noticed that Demography and ethnography have not made in the context and portions of page content, templates, or other materials of this page, If you agree take this opportunity to add references to the article. Regards. Balash-Vologases (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to ask why my map of the Province of Creta et Cyrenaica was ultimately reversed with no apparent reason Shuaaa2 (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The old map matches those used for other provinces, and shows the map in relation to the rest of the empire! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah but that is not a good argument is it, the Article isnt about the broader Roman provinces it is about specifically the province of Creta and Cyrenaica, i dont think that is an objective reason to remove the map from the article Shuaaa2 (talk) 17:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	hi im sorry for fighting with u PhonecianSoldier (talk) 21:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your scrutiny of communist parties and groups in Belgium! Thank you for being an awesome Wikipedian! gidonb (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar, it truly means a lot! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Well deserved!!! gidonb (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, curious what is the problem with the sources for the bands I added? All the sources are articles about the bands that classify them as prog. And anyone who is a prog fan would also agree these are prog bands. Thanks.

Firstly, you need to sign your talk-page messages for the sake of clarity. Secondly, the sources aren't the problem. Bands should not be added to band-lists unless they have their own wikipedia-articles, otherwise these lists will quickly become highly inflated with entries! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The PP is not even that "progressive" they are moderate progressive, even according to cited source.

Also, I agree with the other edits, but my sources did prove that they support centralization and are pragmatic. IGotAPHD (talk) 22:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might need to be more specific. I patrol over 40k articles, and have no recollection of what this is about. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vif12vf,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peasantism for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.

If you don't want Peasantism to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening, I saw you have reverted the contents I added & even restored from the past that have been changed some days ago. First of all, Lazarevic coat of arms is much more suitable as Moravian Serbia then Hrebeljanović dynasty. Second, the flag I have added is actually the existing flag that is also depicted as an actual flag in Serbian old towers built at that time, if you want to see the pictures, I can source them to you to prove that the flag actually existed and prevent edit wars.. The sources are from Golubovac fortress that is medieval age & a bit restored as a museum now & it depicts that flag, thank you! Currings (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources need to be listed on the file-page of the pictures you want to use, that is all! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:35, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, why do you think that these sources are unreliable if they are released by the government of Abkhazia and the North Caucasus, I do not understand your actions, because you have not even read them Alsho093 (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never said they are unreliable, read the edit-summary! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please keep pks article from nonsense edits. Pks is central right party and the faction is central-leftist and rightist. Thank you Great achievement (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will ask you to defend the article Principality of Abkhazia, because there is often a war of edits due to vandalism Alsho093 (talk) 06:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, are you sure it is center-right to right-wing? since, it is mostly conservative, social and fiscal conservative, on all types. It would make sense if there is a liberal-conservativism or conservative liberal, but there is none. 75.113.159.27 (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Longstanding details should not be unilaterally changed without a really good rationale or good sources to back it up. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait! The source is from 2012, when is the sources conseried outdated? for 10 years or pre-2005. 75.113.159.27 (talk) 01:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on wether newer sources confirming or contradicting it can be found. Sources used here do not necessarily lose relevance unless newer/better sources can be found to replace them. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I understand why you put centre-right to right-wing. :) 75.113.159.27 (talk) 05:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 05:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add economic liberalism to the ideologies, please. The sources is from [30] and [45] from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civic_Platform#Ideology. I would appreciate if you did add economic liberalism to template in political ideology in the page Civic Platform. Please and Thank you! From 75.113.159.27, :) 75.113.159.27 (talk) 00:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother threatening me, I already know you aren't an administrator. Tell me why the edits are unconstructive, and in fact, I was adding information to infobox quite constructively. You did not give any revert reason, so I'll have to ask you to ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.

Thanks!

Chastizement (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not threatening you, and one does not need to be an admin to warn someone about their edits being unhelpful. The info you sought to add does not belong in the infobox of a current state! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

don't bother with him, he's the worst admin I've ever integrated with on this site DoomWizard666 (talk) 21:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who? There is no admin here! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been on Wikipedia since 2010 (fourteen years, as of this writing), with over one hundred edits here of which I never had any issue with anybody.

Today I made a single edit, which was reverted by this user without ANY explanation. I revert it back and he now posted on my talk page with threats and accusations.

I suggest everyone to keep track of what this user does because this is abusive behaviour - pretty much digital bullying. Raven-14 (talk) 08:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have no conception of what bullying is! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't give sources for the changes to that article, and that is presumably the reason they reverted your change. You've also made a few unsourced or poorly sourced edits to other Portuguese political articles, and reverted edits to your edits, arguing the other editor is uniformed. Being harsh isn't the same thing as bullying or being abusive, and, although I'm in no way an administrator, I'd recommend sourcing potentially controversial changes in the future. Atriskofmistake (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vif12vf, I noticed you reverted my edit regarding the party color of the Kurdistan Toilers' Party. If you checked the article, you can see that the color tone is, in fact, not used by the party. Sadly, I have no idea how to find the party color templates so that I could edit it over there and googling it doesn't give me an answer either. If you can tell me I'll just edit the obviously wrong color over there. Thx.--Ermanarich (talk) 01:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find the template at Module:Political party/K, you can find the other tamplate lists at Module:Political party. I'd agree these aren't the easiest to find if you dont already know where to look, so i suggest bookmarking them if you think you'll have a hard time remembering them. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very helpful, thanks! :) --Ermanarich (talk) 01:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries 🙂 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is a neutral notice; Raven-14 is the editor who has brought up a concern. Nate • (chatter) 16:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vif12vf. The above discussion was closed with no action against you, in large part because the reporting editor had been disruptive. That said, I would encourage you to change your Twinkle practice. Please use edit summaries whenever reverting good-faith contributions using Twinkle, even if you strongly disagree with the changes or find that they have serious problems. If it's vandalism, by all means use the tool and revert without explanation. At least for the Twinkle settings I have active, edit summaries are possible when I use the [rollback (AGF)] button or the [restore this version] button. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here are two more recent edits of yours in which you reverted edits that—at least at a glance—appear to have been made in good faith: [2], [3]. Please use an edit summary when reverting such edits. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. This is an ongoing issue with your edits. Is there any way I can convince you to change your conduct? Would it be helpful if I explained more about how your practices are harmful? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue, you will be blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what, not providing an edit-summary for every God-damned edit? Last time I checked, that wasn't something people got blocked for, otherwise the majority of edits I observe would get the editors blocked! Not every edit needs a summary, and most of the people I revert dont even read the edit-summaries to begin with, hence why a lot of edit-conflicts on this page happen in the first place! In a lot of cases, looking at the actual edit alone will be more than enough to understand what is going on, though something tells me you are simply looking for summaries in my editing history, while intentionally neglecting the edits themselves! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I would not block you for not using edit summaries for every edit. It's the fact that you're using a semi-automated editing tool to revert or rollback the good-faith efforts of other editors and providing no explanation. See, for example, the consensus policy, "All edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious) ... Explanations are especially important when reverting another editor's good-faith work." Or the aforementioned WP:TWINKLEABUSE.

If you revert an edit that is not vandalism, please explain why. Thank you for responding here, as your lack of communication was part of the problem. I would much rather not block you and just see that you've committed to more explanation moving forward. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serve The People Norway does not claim to uphold Gonzalo Thought in any form yet this user consistently keeps assigning such ideological classification to this group. Battle1509 (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources are not acceptable when determining the ideology and position of a party or group. You also keep consistently adding the content in the wrong manner! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article is primary sources, there is nothing else to determine the ideology. Battle1509 (talk) 18:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like the group isn't notable enough to deserve an article then! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you speak with such a mentality of superiority? This is not professional and only comes off as passive aggressive and heavily rude. Battle1509 (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not, but tone cannot simply be read, you have no way of simply knowing what tone someone intends for a sentence to be read with! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Their ideology is Vanvan n6 (talk) 04:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies of parties, organisations etc should be sourced using reliable third-party sources. People who want to edit wikipedia are not allowed to ever use themselves as a source! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you check out this article and help us sort out the disagreement. the fact is that official documents and population censuses are in Arabic, but one participant constantly changes them, as if the wires are unreliable among most historians with the opinion that false information may appear, please consider and help us figure it out, as an example I would like to give the document the state and deal with the dispute of the "state language" File:The Ottoman Archive about Abasia.jpg Alsho093 (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]