User talk:UsedBeen20

Welcome

Hello, UsedBeen20, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Unregistered user

Are you connected with User talk:209.117.69.2? Leaky Caldron 13:35, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 16:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been stalked by strangepasserby ever since i supported you on your nomination. i seriously doubt there is anything wrong with a newcomer voting in discussions. i created this name over a year ago, but only started editing today so that explains being here for just one day. UsedBeen20 (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsedBeen20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribsdeleted contribs • filter log • creation logchange block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

though I'm not surprised for being blocked for critisizing an administrator on WP:ANI, i really don't understand why person who blocked me unblocked and still blocked? i think a neutral administrator should review this, as i don't see any of my edits as being disruptive or insulting to others (aside maybe from the critism on AN/I) UsedBeen20 (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've been blocked for abusing multiple accounts, not insulting an admin. Nick-D (talk) 08:44, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsedBeen20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribsdeleted contribs • filter log • creation logchange block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, so maybe I used my ip address first and switched this using this username. and even if i have other accounts how do you expect me yo use only one account if you keep blocking them? UsedBeen20 (talk) 13:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Because to do otherwise is a violation of policy. I have come across very few unblock requests that so clearly demonstrate the need to keep the block in place as this one does. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsedBeen20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribsdeleted contribs • filter log • creation logchange block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Will you unblock if i agree to use only this account? also, please ignore the tagging since the person that tagged has no proof who the account belongs to or least present evidence justifying the action taken. UsedBeen20 (talk) 1:32 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuser of multiple accounts, quite likely Don't Feed the Zords (talk · contribs) TNXMan 20:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tropical Storm Alberto

Hurrican season has begun. Time to start writing Tropical Storm Alberto (2012)

UsedBeen20 (talk) 03:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UsedBeen20&oldid=1043667292"