User talk:Urmelbeauftragter

Hello Urmelbeauftragter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Benjaminstewart05 20:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to Front Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urmelbeauftragter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using Wikipedia for promoting the Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality, as you did at Catholic spirituality, Christian mysticism and Outline of spirituality. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, I'm simply a "fan" of it. If you consider some links as advertisement please feel free to modify or to delete it.--Urmelbeauftragter 08:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fully understand your enthusiasm; the center looks very interesting to me. It's just that it's WP:UNDUE to give it so much coverage. For a crude comparison: American Evangelism is more relevant for the contemporary world than these eclectic, liberal centers of modern spirituality... Tribal consciousness may not be covered that deep, actually. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das darf doch wohl nicht wahr sein, dass Haus der Begegnung ein roter link ist, sogar auch auf deutsch. Dehm-Verlag ist jetzt ein redirect. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been adding descriptions of Student Initiative Rahel in a very promotional way in articles and giving it undue weight. Please read the link to WP:UNDUE that Joshua Jonathan mentioned above. Also, if you have a connection to this program, you should read Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies (WP:COI) before editing any further. Sincerely, Tdslk (talk) 23:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Urmelbeauftragter, I also agree that these sections are overdone. I do not necessarily agree they are spam, and I think that judgment by Tdslk is too harsh, but something has to give. The amount of detail about the organization you seem to be advocating for in this edit, for instance, is too much. (Note also that words like "woman" or "scholarship" should not be wikilinked.) So this is not to say that all of that needs to go, but certainly some of it. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drmies! Why you have placed the Template:Primary sources in the article. I'm not a member of the project I didn't use use sources from the project but also other sources like from the Frankfurter Rundschau newspaper. Ok, it seems to me that there were too much details in the related articles. I will change them.--Urmelbeauftragter 17:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure adding the same generic non informative paragraph on many main pages will help our readers. I understand your a fan on this one organization...but just adding the same paragraph all over to get traffic to the one article is a bit much. There is not relevernt data or any info that makes this organization stand-out for the many many others like it. Is see others have also reverted the additions...perhaps best to come up with some data or something relevant to these main pages ?-- Moxy (talk) 17:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROMOTION

You have to understand that trying to spam the same thing into as many articles as possible tends to stretch my assumption of good faith. It seems as if you are engaging in WP:PROMOTION of these subjects. Regardless of whether or not you have an actual conflict of interest, this kind of promotional activity is heavily frowned upon here at Wikipedia. This is a non-commercial enterprise with a neutrality policy which prevents us from providing a platform for advertising and promotion. Elizium23 (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal interests are promotion? And what has personal interests to do with commercial enterprises? Why I have a Conflict of Interest if I'm interested in something? For example I have nothing to do with the OVC project of the Eparchie of Adigrat in Ethiopia. I have heard of it from a member of Student Initiative Rahel who told from it in a church service. Why this is advertising and promotion?--Urmelbeauftragter 10:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Student Initiative Rahel at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me it's better now.--Urmelbeauftragter 17:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to put it on the nominations' page, if you haven't done so, under the date when the article was created, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I've already done it?--Urmelbeauftragter 18:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How would I know. The bot tells you you didn't. Did you add it now? - Different topic: by reviewed, it's not any article reviewed. It's review one DYK nomination checking it against the criteria. For the first five nominations, no review is needed. I guess this is only your second, right? My advice: strike all these "reviews" which don't count anyway, and all entries made to the nomination after the initial one need a signature. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I checked, it's nominated, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've removes all "reviewed"-entries.--Urmelbeauftragter 21:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - see also --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When we will hear the English version of Laudato si’ translated by Gerda Arendt?--Urmelbeauftragter 21:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I won't translate but write a short one for the English readers, my Christmas gift, and the magic little thing in the title is not curled here, will be Laudato si' (oratorio), - compare Laudato si' ;) - From tomorrow to Christmas, I will have a DYK every day, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No no no, I mean: When will we HEAR the oratorio performed in English "translated by Gerda Arendt"? And furthermore: I will never reach you in number of DYK nominations ... ;-) --Urmelbeauftragter 22:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh! No, we perform Die Entführung aus dem Serail in German, and will leave the language mix of Latin / German / Italian / Hewbrew untouched ;) - DYK noms are not about competition, but make things known ;) - Wrote the 151st DYK review of 2016 today, which will not be the last. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! You won't write an English text version of the oratorio?--Urmelbeauftragter 17:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To translate texts with music to a different language is an unrewarding job that leaves you never satisfied. The same vowels with the same stresses should appear on same notes, with the adequate meaning of course, - hardly ever matches. Compromises would be needed, and some of them bad ones, - no thank you ;) - Btw, did you notice that the Malwina who appeared on SG with the oratorio drew 70k+ hits? My Teaser ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Malwina? What's this? 70k+ hits? I had only 4k+ hits with the oratorio on :de: ... *sniff* --Urmelbeauftragter 22:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Life is not fair, and my memory was wrong, only 21.777, de:Malvina Schnorr von Carolsfeld, but she had a tough life, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She was unknown to me until now. ;-) But you brought me to test a nomination the first time and it worked. In :en: I had no luck until now with Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality, Student Initiative Rahel or OVC project. Let's wait and see ... ::::::::::::::::

Patience is sometimes needed, - the oldest nomination was approved today, after 3 months, - btw: if an image is there, it needs a caption, and the always same (pictured) after what is pictured. I failed to see any relation of coffee ceremony to project in the article, so good luck ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh jes, the Rahel project used Ethiopian coffee ceremonies at charity events but not the OVC project. It seems to me it's not the right picture for this nomination ... Hmmmmm ... But I didn't want to use the same picture for the OVC project like for the Rahel project.--Urmelbeauftragter 22:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I exchanged the pictures with each other. This makes more sense ... --Urmelbeauftragter 22:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seven of eight DYK have to go without image. To nominate pictures that will not be taken is a waste of time, also for the reviewer who has to check licensing. This pic was not taken. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 02:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What can I do for it?--Urmelbeauftragter 10:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I posted my statement concerning the Talk page of article Advent there--Urmelbeauftragter 13:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JustBerry: And what happens now with this dispute? Can I add a picture or a video of an Advent labyrinth to the article Advent or not?--Urmelbeauftragter 12:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Except of one point I could fix the issues.--Urmelbeauftragter 21:35, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you made any progress on that one point? You said you were looking for further sourcing. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:02, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some research on the point that the Centre was the first institution of its kind in Germany. I've found no source that this was right but I've found also no source that it was wrong. I've made a new article with my results which is only available in German until now on Meditationskirche. It was as far as I could found the first christian centre of meditation in Germany. There is only one further in a Protestant church in Hamburg but this was founded in 2009. But the centre in Frankfurt was founded in 2007.--Urmelbeauftragter 16:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article OVC project, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the OVC project supports the education of disadvantaged young people in Adigrat, Ethiopia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/OVC project. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, OVC project), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message!--Urmelbeauftragter 21:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hi, a discussion has been opened to delete some categories about churches among them catholic and orthodox I would like to have your opinion here Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 January 21--Warairarepano&Guaicaipuro (talk) 12:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Student Initiative Rahel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:48, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has been over two weeks, and you still have not addressed the issues that BU Rob13 pointed out still need work. Please respond soon if you wish this nomination to continue. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality in Frankfurt, visitors can walk through a labyrinth of burning tealights (pictured) one Saturday each year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

locomotive spirituality

Thank you for quality articles such as Holy Cross - Centre for Christian Meditation and Spirituality and LNER Peppercorn Class A1 60163 Tornado, for the German Laudato si’, for initiative in Ethiopia, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Look for Helmut here: your pic! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I've seen it! Best wishes for your nomination.--Urmelbeauftragter 11:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1581 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much ... But I'm not very active in the moment.--Urmelbeauftragter 22:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years now, it's forever, and Happy Valentine! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... so three, flowers --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urmelbeauftragter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Theme Churches of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Limburg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 19:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urmelbeauftragter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helmut Schlegel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Retreat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see your name again on my watchlist! - I doubt that it's worth mentioning in a single church's article that service were interrupted because of the pandemic. Imagine we'd do that to all church articles. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's because the complete program of the meditation centre was cancelled not only the services. --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 08:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but is that encyclopedic? - Every opera house noting when closed, when resumed a bit? I'd say no. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this changes the program listed in the article? --Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean. In the churches and opera houses I write about, I don't list shut-down and limited reopening, - it's nothing particular to a place. You may want to see - on my talk, bottom - what I told someone who wrote way too much detail, in that case a pianist's bio. Imagine a reader in 2030 ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Urmelbeauftragter, wikipedia is not a newspaper (WP:NOTNEWS), announcements of closure or reopening [1] do not appear to be appropriate in an encyclopedia. JimRenge (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

We'll sing Peter Reulein's Te Deum in Idstein 6 May, 7pm, and 7 May, 5pm, international collaboration. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:PeterGabrielOvoTheStoryOfOvoFrontCover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be speedy deleted as redundant, because it is the file with the right name. The File:This is the Front cover for the second CD of the Album OVO The Millennium Show by the artist Peter Gabriel. The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the label, Real World Records, or the graphic artist(s), Zadok Ben-David.jpg should be deleted. --Urmelbeauftragter 12:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:This is the Front cover for the second CD of the Album OVO The Millennium Show by the artist Peter Gabriel. The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the label, Real World Records, or the graphic artist(s), Zadok Ben-David.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Real World Studios logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Melanie Gabriel. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and the single interview reference is insufficient for a WP:BLP. It is largely unsourced. . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 08:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've translated the article from German Wikipedia. I couldn't add more than the 9 sources which are already in the article. Urmelbeauftragter (talk) 08:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urmelbeauftragter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melanie Gabriel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]