User talk:Tyrekecorrea

{{NoACEMM}} Thanks for your comment, but please use my discussion page in the future. --Jnelson09 (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1) No caps are needed in cerebral palsy 2) We general use person not patient Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:40, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tyrekecorrea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pentatonix, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 20:08, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Pentatonix. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization ^Talk 20:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it on TV! What do you want me to do, grab a link from Variety Magazine?!? It's still on CBS's video player. You and everyone else who doesn't believe me can go check it out for themselves. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 14:19, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demand responsive transport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Transit Authority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Format of Sesame Street, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:51, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was just editing for clarity. Will you calm down please? Tyrekecorrea (talk) 03:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, I was calm. You calm down! ;) No, seriously, there's editing for clarity and there's adding unsourced content. Your addition was more of the latter than the former. Plus, this article is a FA, and the language was already facetiously vetted. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:57, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was really just rephrasing what was already there, but what else were you talking about? Tyrekecorrea (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 00:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't even remember what I did to that thing. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that. Well, I was going to edit the rest of that thing for grammar, and I was almost done, but I guess I'll take five. It's not worth getting nipped by the fun police. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 01:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• “Number retired” = no one will wear the number again
• “Jersey retired” = the player’s jersey hangs but the number is in circulation.

I changed The wording to reflect the latter. Rikster2 (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not just about the difference in the terminology. There's a difference between what the school said and what they actually did, and given that, as I said, they breached their own protocol, the difference matters.

Tyrekecorrea (talk) 21:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting the edits - the terminology is correct for the situation, we have many college programs who do it the same way like UNC and Kansas. You also keep changing dates of championships to incorrect values. For example, McCarville was not with the Minnesota Lynx in 2011. Rikster2 (talk) 22:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know exactly what I'm doing; obviously, this isn't about other schools; this is about what happened to Janel what was done to her.

Besides, even though nobody else says Janel was with the Lynx in 2011, she was. I read between the lines and sussed it out. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Janel McCarville. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Rikster2 (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, dude, at least use your own words.

Just because nobody has published what I've discovered doesn't mean it's not true. People tend to be very sneaky about this sort of thing. That's why Janel got shafted and why the information in question which persists on the page pertaining to her is wrong. Frankly, on a related note, I found I have reason to believe and that at least some information on a great many if not all Wikipedia pages, is wrong. It weighs on my conscience and seems to be in discord with my reason for being. I tell myself I’ll come back for this when I’m on my deathbed, but it eats away at me so. I find it especially difficult to resist this desire to set things right, and so I can't promise I'm going to be able to avoid editing this again. Being able to edit Wikipedia is important to me, so I restrain myself with that in mind. However, we shouldn’t expect miracles.

Tyrekecorrea (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Christmas and holiday season, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please cite a reliable source for "efforts to incorporate discussion of Ramadan." MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I haven't got time for legalism on Wikipedia. Some observations are notable enough to be noted and accepted in good faith, and just because people don't bring somethings up as they follow the letter of rules when discussing things in the articles they write doesn't mean they don't exist. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to List of breakout characters, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy. I know you don't edit here that often, but since you've accumulated over 2,000 edits since 2008, you've been made aware, as in the messages left by others above, that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which editors learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of what the mass media says and what the Wikipedia rules say, but I also have been able to figure out when Kevin Clash died, and letting dishonesty on the subject stand doesn't sit right with me. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what subject you're referring to. The edit in question was to the London Tipton entry in the article, not Elmo or any entry mentioning Kevin Clash, the mass media, or any "dishonesty" that I'm aware of. If there is some subtext or backstory here that pertains to the London Tipton entry that I'm not aware of, I apologize. Nightscream (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The London Tipton entry was one of the only ones without context; it doesn't seem right. Tyrekecorrea (talk) 03:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]