User talk:Turktimex3

Hi Turktimex3! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elisabeth Griffith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP doesn't meet WP:BIO1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:05, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Turktimex3. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Turktimex3. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Turktimex3|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i see you and Turtle are having difficulty abiding by Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals; maybe you should stop reviewing articles, until you can demonstrate compliance with consensus policy. your righting great COI wrongs and suspension of Wikipedia:Assume good faith is problematic, and harms the wiki. --Turktimex3 (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond

Hello Turktimex3. Could you please respond to the above request from Rosguill? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i did "respond"; do you have a subpoena? are you going to stop vandalizing that article? --Turktimex3 (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No you have not answered their question regarding whether you have a COI to disclose. Please note that the snarky attitude is not helpful and you don't seem to understand what vandalism means. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you have demonstrated an abject ignorance of notability. you are not here to write an encyclopedia, but delete one. I will be reverting your "un-constructive" edits as vandalism. do not interact with me. you have proven yourself not fit to copyedit my work. --Turktimex3 (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you wish, I will no longer post here (unless required to for ANI notifications etc). I note that you never answered the question about the COI disclosure, and there are many issues with the latest reply. Farewell, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sabrina Dhowre Elba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP doesn't meet WP:NBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Elisabetta Foradori. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, a lot of these are terrible. They are caricatures, which exaggerate the features of the subject and do not provide the reader with a faithful depiction. That has serious WP:BLP concerns. Then there's issues like File:Johanne Nielsdatter.jpg, where the caption says "An illustrated idea of Johanne Nielsdatter, whose actual appearance is undocumented". So, it is fabricated from the mind of the creator. Who is user "Fduriez" that uploaded it? Are they an expert in this field od study? Can you provide a reliable source that vouches for them? I'm duessing "no". There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Cartoon_portraits which you may wish to weigh in on. Zaathras (talk) 00:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

better a third grader's paint image, than a third grader's bullying on the playground. --Turktimex3 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the only editor who has raised concerns about the images, so, tamp down the attitude a bit. Join the discussion linked above if you wish. Zaathras (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your "unverified" is not a consensus policy; your aesthetics are juvenile. feel free to replace the image with a "non-free" photograph. --Turktimex3 (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

see also, Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2022_March_8#File:Marian_Ewurama_Addy.jpg; feel free to propose replacement images at FFD. --Turktimex3 (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will not be doing any such thing, no, as an article with no image is better than an article with a bad image. I will not be following up in this thread further. Please join the community discussion if you have further input. Zaathras (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

on the contrary, articles with images receive more views than those without. do not destroy what you cannot create. i will not do any such thing; wake me if you reach any consensus, beyond your idiosyncratic "idontlikeit". --Turktimex3 (talk) 15:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Einat Ramon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Cartoon_portraits. Some1 (talk) 18:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the fact remains, i have created more content and articles than you. what evidence do you have, if any, that you are here to write an encyclopedia? --Turktimex3 (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The removal of reliable sourced content is completely allowable. Please read WP:ONUS, which also says The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. Please follow WP:BRD, especially when you have been reverted by multiple editors across multiple articles. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabrina Dhowre Elba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Dhowre Elba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

cite your policy for "inappropriate images"; there are not "fan art", rather you are intervening in a content dispute. unilaterally declaring you will enforce the deletion of content, where there is no disruption. you might want to curate images in a "non-amateurosh" manner. --Turktimex3 (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore or add any more cartoons, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i don't have to #WPWP will be along shortly. you might have difficulty enforcing your idiosyncratic aesthetic views. --Turktimex3 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Einat Ramon Universidad Hebraíca.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Veggies (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not a "corrupt" file, but we will see how you like FFD. --Turktimex3 (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Laurel Hubbard star observer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beccaynr (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Einat Ramon Universidad Hebraíca.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Turktimex3,

Thank you for creating Marie-Andrée Schwindenhammer.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating the article! Please ensure all sources are reliable WP:RELY; https://theheroines.blogspot.com/2015/03/interview-with-karine-solene-espineira.html is a blog and should not be used to support notability. I would recommend looking into Transgender Experience: Place, Ethnicity, and Visibility. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2013 as a possible reference. Material included in the French page can also be used, as long as it properly attributed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ppt91 (talk) 15:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is an error, I am unable to correct it. Xx236 (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please be sure to include living=yes for WikiProject Biography tagging on article talk pages when the subject is still alive. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elisabeth Feller architonic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Murder of Bridget Cleary.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Veggies (talk) 22:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for a third opinion on our disagreement at Talk:Murder of Bridget Cleary#Image inclusion. The page asks that the other editor is notified of such discussions so I hope this works. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Selma Selman. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 17:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Marie-Andrée Schwindenhammer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Turktimex3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Ratkowsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Zofia Kowalewska is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lisa Schurer Lambert. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Lisa Schurer Lambert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is not the first time editors here have suspected you were editing in a promotional manner; you're proving them right. In addition, the aggression I find in many of your responses (to User:Rosguill, User:MrsSnoozyTurtle, User:Zaathras, User:Some1, User:Ohnoitsjamie, and to me) suggest that you are treating Wikipedia as a battleground. It is not. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please refrain from section blanking vandalism. if you want to collaborate discuss on talk. please do not continue to vandalise this article. your edit warring will not prevail here. your warnings are beneath contempt. your "anti-promotional" war is not founded on fact but ignorance, you are not here to write an encyclopedia, but edit war. --Turktimex3 (talk) 02:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, with your accusations in here, that's four false accusations of vandalism, in addition to the promotional editing and the attempt to publish BLPs without proper secondary sourcing. Now, kindly explain whether you have any conflict of interest here--thank you.[ec] I apologize for the edit conflict--but "you are here to edit war" counts as the fifth violation of AGF. Drmies (talk) 02:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

present evidence of a COI or stfu. you sectioned blanked which is prima facie vandalism. your "secondary sourcing" is not how WP:NACADEMIC works: i.e. "5. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon." i do not see any evidence of good faith here. apology not accepted. --Turktimex3 (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Don't cry COI, or people might call you a concern troll. --Turktimex3 (talk) 11:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Sara Vidal, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for two weeks from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Personal attacks and harassment is another factor in your block, along with failure to assume good faith. Cullen328 (talk) 08:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False accusations of vandalism is another aggravating factor. Cullen328 (talk) 08:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikid77/Blanking sections sometimes violates policies: "Please remember the use of unexplained or bad-faith blanking is often considered a form of vandalism."

you have now engaged in a content dispute. the section blanked at Lisa Schurer Lambert has been restored by others, and the move to draft, has been moved back by others: what did you accomplish except waste everyone's time, and undermine your credibility and authority?

you might want to look into the false claims of COI, Wikipedia:Don't cry COI, if you would want to have credibility about falsehood. --Turktimex3 (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Selma Selman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dnieper basin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nele Barber, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Corina Glaab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Élodie Chabrol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Élodie Chabrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently edited and moved to main space, Jennifer Pan (professor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not move this yourself or it will be moved back to draft space. You must use the AfC process based on your history according to your talk page of this happening on numerous occasions. Also note, I removed the five sources for one publication. If listed as a publication it does not need citations added to it, however other criteria must must be met per either listed above. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 04:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please help translate to other languages.

Congratulations on your remarkable achievement of winning a local prize in the Feminism and Folklore 2023 writing competition! We greatly appreciate your valuable contribution and the effort you put into documenting your local Folk culture and Women on Wikipedia. To ensure you receive your prize, please take a moment to complete the preferences form before the 1st of July 2023. You can access the form by clicking here. We kindly request you to submit the form before the deadline to avoid any potential disappointments.

If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us via talkpage or Email. We are more than happy to help.

Best wishes,

FNF 2023 International Team

Stay connected  

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

We extend our sincerest gratitude to you for making an extraordinary impact in the Feminism and Folklore 2023 writing competition. Your remarkable dedication and efforts have been instrumental in bridging cultural and gender gaps on Wikipedia. We are truly grateful for the time and energy you've invested in this endeavor.

As a token of our deep appreciation, we'd love to send you a special postcard. It serves as a small gesture to convey our immense thanks for your involvement in the competition. To ensure you receive this token of appreciation, kindly fill out this form by August 15th, 2023.

Looking ahead, we are thrilled to announce that we'll be hosting Feminism and Folklore in 2024. We eagerly await your presence in the upcoming year as we continue our journey to empower and foster inclusivity.

Once again, thank you for being an essential part of our mission to promote feminism and preserve folklore on Wikipedia.

With warm regards,

Feminism and Folklore International Team.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Slowking4 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Slowking4. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 14:05, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gaia Maris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete; no in-depth sourcing on her available online

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Why? I Ask (talk) 03:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]