User talk:Torygreen84

Hello, Torygreen84, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Capital punishment in Australia has been reverted.
Your edit here to Capital punishment in Australia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/groups/986412794754704/?hc_location=ufi, https://www.facebook.com/Death-Penalty-is-needed-in-Australia-243466288999514/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to explain why you changed the opinion polling section on the Conservative Party of Canada leadership election, 2017 to get rid of the section on Conservative Party members? If you cannot justify the edit it should be reversed. Newfoundlander&Labradorian (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC) As I recall I didn't get rid of the section I only merged the TWO Conservative Party members Sections Sections. Torygreen84 (talk) 12:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

could somebody make a Template of Defunct Indian political parties Thanks because I don't know how to do it. Torygreen84 (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting the creation of templates is done at Wikipedia:Requested templates. Primefac (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AJFU. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  AJFU  08:46, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Citizens' Movement (New Zealand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence given that they meet WP:Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kashmir conflict, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christian politics in South Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No actual content, seemingly abandoned draft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be a little more careful in adding MPs' views to their article. An article that already states that the subject opposes SSM does not then need another sentence saying they'll be voting no - of course they will. Also, be careful with the VoteCompass thing, which was an opt-in survey and thus not remotely statistically valid (we cannot categorically say "X electorate supports/opposes SSM", only "opt-in survey VoteCompass results from this electorate showed majority support/opposition ..."). Also, you added to a few articles (Jason Clare, Ed Husic, Chris Bowen) that they supported SSM while their electorates were majority against it, and this isn't even what VoteCompass said. Only one electorate, Maranoa, had a majority opposed. Blaxland, Chifley and McMahon just didn't get to 50% (there was a don't know option as well). Frickeg (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Torygreen84. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]