User talk:Theopolisme/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

That looked gibberish to me. Well, even knowing that it is Romanian it is still... Thanks for fixing the CSD to be the proper category--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 01:31, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

@Loriendrew: Not a problem; after all, the page is still deletion worthy! I find Google Translate to be a huge help for anything that looks like gibberish -- I am hardly Romanian, but its "autodetect" functionality is often effective enough to at least get the gist of a page when patrolling. Theopolisme (talk) 01:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Could you check what has happened with your bot? It hasn't reduced any files for some time. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I've started it running manually. I'll look into what's stopping the automated runs tonight. Theopolisme (talk) 10:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! --Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Should now be running as scheduled (daily). Please let me know if it stops again, Theopolisme (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

I reached 5k edits today, and also had my user page vandalized for the tenth time, so I guess I'm doing something right :) how you doing? Dan653 (talk) 01:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that you just received the protected template editor userright. Are there any full protected templates that you'd like to edit? Let me know and I'll downgrade the protection so you can do so. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mark, thanks for the message (because without it, I probably wouldn't have noticed that Legoktm granted me the right!). Not at the moment, but I'll be sure to harass you in the future. :) Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The September 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the October blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Did you ever get that list generated that I requested in Bot Requests? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: Alright, I'm running the database query now -- will let you know when the results are available. Thanks for your patience! Theopolisme (talk) 00:20, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

I found 35,281 non-redirects in the article namespace that were "unnecessarily disambiguated"; the complete list (in the form of [[Current title]] → [[New title without parentheses]]) will be posted at User:Theo's Little Bot/unnecessary dab later today. Theopolisme (talk) 10:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: Alright, I've listed the first 10,000 of them at User:Theo's Little Bot/unnecessary dab. At that point the page became too large to add any more. What do you plan to do with this information? Theopolisme (talk) 22:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Get some page-moving done, of course. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Well I'd hope so :) It's quite a few pages, though, so I was thinking about possibilities for semi-automated moves (for example, would a user script that added a "one-click move" link next to each of the items on the page be of use?). Theopolisme (talk) 23:48, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You seem to be the guy to ask. I signed up for the Backlog Drive, enabled the Buddy script and created the subpage, but only my first ten reviews are showing up in the review count. Can you help? I want a brownie! Thank you! Appreciate your time as always. JSFarman (talk) 21:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi JSFarman, thanks for the message. AfCBuddy only runs when Excirial (its sole developer -- AfCBuddy is separate from AFCH, which I co-develop) manually starts it. Sometimes it takes a few days for him to get around to it, but no worries. Theopolisme (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Ah, thank you. Maybe I'll harass him. :) JSFarman (talk) 23:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

If you have a moment, please check this out. It's a clone as you'll see but It's been looked over already and copyedited by Technical 13 and if you and he, and perhaps Theonesean think it's ready to go I'll think about moving it. It has a talk page for any comments. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi resident bot expert, Theopolisme. It's been a while since we've interacted, but I remember your expertise in bots, and wanted your take on the feasibility of a bot to fill in roster templates (like the one in my sandbox) from a website like this one? Or at least an assisted way? It's extraordinarily tedious to do manually, so I thought there may be a way to automate (preferably one to automate roster templates for all sports). Any thoughts? Thanks in advance, Go Phightins! 20:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Go Phightins!, it's quite possible -- in fact, this is an excellent task for a bot. If you could provide me with specifics (what exactly goes where) then I'd be happy to put something together over the coming weeks (that we could then look into expanding to other sports and such). Theopolisme (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Really, yahoo! So basically, the one I am working on uses Template:American football roster, and includes parameters for class, number, position, name, etc. that correspond to what is on a team's website. So for example, from the roster website above that I linked, number goes in the "num" parameter, first name in the "first" parameter, last name in the "last" parameter, position in the "pos" parameter, and class in the "class" parameter. These correspond to what is on the roster pages. Most college football teams' websites are run by CBS Interactive, and thus have that same roster format. Thanks! Go Phightins! 22:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Great. I'll let you know if I need anything else-- Theopolisme (talk) 23:14, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/archive%%0#Option to not watch talk pages inspired me to ask if you could write a script or off-Wiki tool that would take my watchlist (perhaps pasted-in as text if it's an off-wiki tool) and a "number of days ago" then split the list into two sections: Those pages in which EITHER I have edited the page or its talk page in the past X days OR which either the page (if it's a discussion page) or its talk page have a section that has been edited in the last X days which I have also edited, ever.

The idea being if I haven't edited a non-discussion page in X days or nobody has responded in the last X days to something I said on the related discussion page, then I may want to remove the page and its associated talk page from my watchlist. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:23, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors October Blitz wrap-up Participation: Out of eleven people who signed up for this blitz, eight copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: During the seven-day blitz, we copy edited 42 articles from WikiProject Film's backlog, reducing it by a net of 34 articles. Hope to see you at the November drive in a few days! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. Sign up for the November drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at LogX's talk page.
Message added 21:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--    L o g  X   21:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

A mouse can be many things. Perhaps these can help:

• Mouse
• Mouse (disambiguation)
• The dictionary definition of mouse at Wiktionary
• Data related to mus at Wikispecies
• Media related to mus at Wikimedia Commons
• Media related to computer mouse at Wikimedia Commons

davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Cupcake Ipsum was too far away ;) Theopolisme (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

LOL. Where are "insert popular culture reference here Ipsum" and "Wikipedia Ipsum" when you need them? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Ha! Wikipedia Ipsum -- now that's a good idea... I may just have a new weekend project. Theopolisme (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar admin redirect sign welcome cookie davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Could you check what your bot is doing here? It reduced the file but kept the {{non-free reduce}} tag, and then on the next day it was removed without adding {{non-free reduced}}. It also happened with a couple of other files. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Looks like the bot crashed midway through its run, so when it encountered the file the next day, it was already reduced, so it removed the tag. Shouldn't happen again -- seems like just a server issue. Let me know if this happens again. Theopolisme (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I see. About crashes, maybe there is something else that you should check? I've noticed that the bot doesn't always reduce all tagged files during the same run. For example, if I tag a dozen files for reduction today, the bot might reduce half of them tomorrow and the other half on the next day. Something seems to stop the bot before it finishes. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Example: File:Matt Cardle When You Were My Girl.png was tagged on 23 October but still hasn't been reduced, although the bot has been running several times since then. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I'll check the error logs. It's possible that one file is causing the bot to die prematurely. Theopolisme (talk) 00:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement.
Message added 13:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Theopolisme, please see my responses over here, and correct any goofs or mischaracterizations I may have caused. Thanks. User_talk:West.andrew.g#User_permissions

p.s. Actually, I'm assuming you are interested in this discussion about securing the AfC gadget, since you're one of the main gadget-hackers at the moment. If that's an incorrect assumption, my apologies, please just ping me back that you are not interested. Appreciate it. Thanks for improving wikipedia. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Legoktm (talk) 23:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Why not going to Wikia for a long time? I'm on here to me. (What? | Changes to you.) 11:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Theo! I'm a bit hesitant to ask you this because of your note saying that you are somewhat busy right now, but it has been a fair amount of time since your last RfA and I was wondering when you might consider running again? Also, if you have the time, please take a look at this new project that I've opened up. Thanks and have a great day, AutomaticStrikeout (₵) 20:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. Not at the moment, but perhaps in the future -- I've been going through alternating states of "incredibly busy" and "way too much time on my hands", so I can't say anything definitive right now. As an aside, the "busy" notice has been up since March, so I would take it with a grain of salt ;) Theopolisme (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok. AutomaticStrikeout (₵) 03:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Theopolisme! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must:

• Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug
• Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot

If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or #huggle ^connect. Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you Petrb (talk) 10:57, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. This is a brief note to let you know about an update to the Main FAQ (the addition of a large table of Components of the discussion system), and also to specifically request your feedback on two items: our sandbox release plan, and a draft of the new contributors survey. We look forward to reading your input on these or other topics - Flow can only get better with your ideas! –Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Theo, how are things?

I just tried to reduce File:Dog Trouble poster.jpg using your tool (this is the link provided by the template) and it threw up an internal server error. It might just be toolserver, or not. This is the info:

• Request host: toolserver.org
• Request path: GET /~theo/cgi-bin/resizer.py

Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Life's crazy, but I'm enjoying it, so I think that's a good thing :) Thanks for the report. My toolserver tools are falling into some state of disrepair, especially as everything migrates to Labs. However, it's not really a big deal, because my bot automatically reduces the size of non-free images (example from earlier today), which has made manual resizing fairly antiquated (except for video/audio files, which it can't handle). Let me know if you have any further questions! Theopolisme (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The problem is that the bot left almost 200 reduction requests in Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests unaddressed... --Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Gotcha. Should be fixed -- check the category again :) Theopolisme (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The bot left two JPG files: File:Bongshang logo.jpg (should be changed to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} in my opinion) and File:Maak-Jou-Drome-Waar.jpg. Any idea why? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Not really. It looks like there's some underlying encoding issue with the files.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "resizer_auto.py", line 182, in <module>
    main()
  File "resizer_auto.py", line 178, in main
    image_routine(flub)
  File "resizer_auto.py", line 94, in image_routine
    file = littleimage.gimme_image(filename,compound_site,pxl,theimage)
  File "/data/project/theoslittlebot/cgi-bin/theobot/NonFreeImageResizer/littleimage.py", line 77, in gimme_image
    img = img.resize((int(basewidth),int(hsize)), Image.ANTIALIAS)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL/Image.py", line 1290, in resize
    self.load()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PIL/ImageFile.py", line 201, in load
    raise IOError("image file is truncated (%d bytes not processed)" % len(b))
IOError: image file is truncated (11 bytes not processed)

Theopolisme (talk) 23:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Theo's Little Bot 21 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 22:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

Hi. You're being contacted as you're listed as an EdwardsBot user.

MassMessage has been deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. For help using the new tool, please check out its help page or drop a note on Meta-Wiki.

With over 400,000 edits to Wikimedia wikis, EdwardsBot has served us well; however EdwardsBot will no longer perform local or global message delivery after December 31, 2013.

A huge thanks to Legoktm, Reedy, Aaron Schulz and everyone else who helped to get MassMessage deployed. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Seeking ambassador for student project.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hoping you will be able to assist us, or point us to an ambassador who is a good fit for our need.

Looking for someone to assist our class edit of Simple English Wikipedia on the afternoon of Dec. 4. This is a one-time class project. More details in the email.

Thank you, Tashabm (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)tashabm

Replied via email Theopolisme (talk) 08:05, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/Theo%27s_Little_Bot_21

Is this running right now? It was recently approved :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

I need to go to sleep, but I'll get the bot started tomorrow (because, hey, what else are you supposed to do on Thanksgiving? ;) ). Theopolisme (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Scheduled to run daily at 11:00 UTC. Theopolisme (talk) 05:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Theopolisme, how are you? I am Petrb, one of huggle developers, and you are currently subscribed as a beta tester of huggle on meta (meta:Huggle/Members. You may not have noticed, but this week I released first beta precompiled installers for ubuntu and microsoft windows! Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta has all the links you need. So if you can, please download it, test it and report all bugs that is really what we need now. Don't forgot that as it's just a beta it's unstable and there are some known issues. Be carefull! Thank you for helping us with huggle Petrb (talk) 16:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Currently getting 10.9-induced make errors (tracked on github), but I don't really have time to fiddle with the configuration to get things working. Lego, I seem to recall that you went through this and found a solution -- care to share? ;) Theopolisme (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Uhhhh, I don't know. I had qt5 installed before I upgraded to 10.9, and never had to re-install it, which is maybe why mine still works. Legoktm (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme:

WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I've added you. The name of the tool is Scottytools. Everything you need is loaded in there. There are some toolserver specific things that need to be rewritten. Ideally they should be rewritten to use the API instead. They should have a FIXME tag on them.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 23:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Did a little work today (namely, got cgi-bin functional). Then Labs started giving me "Service Temporarily Unavailable" errors so I figured I'd drop it for the night and work tomorrow. :) Theopolisme (talk) 08:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)K

keep up the good work lads - you've no idea how much this is going to be appreciated :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Absolutely! Also (there's no rush, I won't be able to do it for a few days anyway) but if you leave me a message (or ping me) when you set up the editor interaction analyzer I'll update the SPI report template. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Callan, will do. Cyber, I'm a little concerned -- I've been looking through your past projects and talking to some other developers, and it seems like you have a history of proprietary -- as opposed to open -- source code, which runs counter to everything the Wikimedia movements stand for. I'd like to verify that the source of Scotty's tools will be publicly available and open to patches/etc, probably by creating a GitHub repo. If not, I'm afraid I can't work with you (and I'll just create another fork that abides by Wikimedia principles). Theopolisme (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I have no issues. I'm planning to open xtools onto GitHub once everything is sorted out.—cyberpower _Online^{Merry Christmas} 18:00, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

I guess that's the issue Theo talks about. What does 'sorted out' mean? The tools work fine, why can't it be posted now? Legoktm (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Some do others don't. I had planned to post them sometime this week, as well as Cyberbot's code.—cyberpower _Online^{Merry Christmas} 23:51, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

TBH, the reason why I was never willing to post Cyberbot's code, is because I was always nervous that my code would receive criticism, and that it would reflect badly towards me as a botop. I've had some time to think about that since spambot, and have come to realize that the best way to get things done is to have more eyes work on it. That's why I plan to release Cyberbot's code. As xtools, that was already decided when I started migrating it. Once migration is finished and is pretty well debugged, it's going to be released on GitHub.—cyberpower _Online^{Merry Christmas} 23:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

But... why wait? The whole point of open source code is to spread the work from the beginning, resulting in a better end product (more eyes, more brains, more fingers on the keyboard, etc). Do you see where we're going with this? Theopolisme (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

According to User:Cyberbot I, nearly all of the tasks have been takeovers of other peoples code, except for SnotBot which you rewrote and the blacklisted links task, which isn't even listed, so I'm not really sure what you're worried about since barely any of the code is yours. Legoktm (talk) 05:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Legoktm and Theopolisme, you guys have great points. I will post the code later today, when my class ends. Legotktm, I guess I'm not much of a contributor, am I? Cyberbot I is solely for takeovers, while Cyberbot II is my own stuff. The blacklisted links task is listed under Cyberbot II.

I have posted the codes here.—cyberpower _Online^{Merry Christmas} 16:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Theopolisme. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement.
Message added 01:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: auto-archiving of nominations with User:Theo's Little Bot Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your bot keeps changing my adopter status to available [1], when I would like it to show me as unavailable at the moment. Is there any way you can stop it edit warring with me? Bellerophon _{talk to me} 22:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

IIRC you just remove the bot-updated parameter, which I have done. Let me know if this doesn't work after its next run :) Theopolisme (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't even notice that param :) Bellerophon _{talk to me} 00:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Please see this gross diff where the bot places its message(s) in the midst of a prior conversation. Fiddle Faddle 11:26, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Ew, that's obnoxious. Stopping the bot and looking into immediately. (I imagine it has something to do with newlines...) Theopolisme (talk) 11:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

As I suspected. Fixed. Thanks for the report! Theopolisme (talk) 12:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Total pleasure. Thanks for the fix. Fiddle Faddle 12:02, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Any chance you can untangle the poor user's talk page? I became bewildered and stopped before I started. No need to reply. Fiddle Faddle 12:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors November 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter The November 2013 drive wrap-up is now ready for review. Sign up for the December blitz! – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Theo! I was just looking over Module:Interval and Module:Countdown - very nice work. :) I noticed that you were calling the #time parser function, but actually there is already a Scribunto equivalent that you can use, mw.language:formatDate. Also, beware of blank arguments - in Lua, the blank string evaluates to true, so code like if args.duration then x end will be triggered if your module is called like {{countdown|duration=}}. I'll try and have a more detailed look later as well. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 22:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

@Mr. Stradivarius: Hey, yeah, I only got down to formatDate in the docs this morning. ;) I've fixed both modules to use it rather than the parser function. As far as blank arguments -- do I just need to do something like if args.duration && #args.duration? Thanks for bearing with me as I learn the quirks of this new language, Theopolisme (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Nope, that's another gotcha. :) Actually, 0 evaluates to true as well. The only things in Lua that evaluate to false are false and nil. I usually work around this by having a function specially for #invoke that trims the arguments and removes the blank ones. (The exact ones you need to remove can vary depending on what template you are converting.) This means that you can just use if args.duration then x end, and it also means you don't have to have a frame object available if you call the module directly from another Lua module. It also means that the code will work whether called directly from #invoke or from a wrapper template. See Module:Toolbar for a typical example of the kind of code I would use. I've also just finished writing Module:Arguments, which does a similar thing with metatables, but I haven't written the documentation up yet - I'll go and do that now. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 02:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Tricky, tricky! I've switched the code to use your Module:Arguments. Theopolisme (talk) 03:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok, Module:Interval is now up in lights. I tweaked it a tiny bit to allow other modules to access it without having to go through a frame object, and I also fixed a bug where n was being compared with a number when n was nil, generating a script error. But those two things are really pretty minor. Congratulations on your first successful template conversion! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Q-go#Notability. -- Trevj (talk • contribs) 12:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC) -- Trevj (talk • contribs) 12:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Theo, I love your bot's listing of unnecessary disambiguation. There are a lot of good cases for moves and disambiguation there. I was using this as a workpage when it occurred to me that I might be screwing something up by doing so. Should I leave it to the bot to update the listing? --BDD (talk) 21:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

@BDD: Not a problem at all, thanks for working on it! That page only lists the first 10,000 due to technical restrictions (there are actually 30,000+, see thread), so if you manage to get through them and want some more material to chew on just let me know and I'll update the list. No hurry ;) Cheers, and let me know if there are any other ways I can help, Theopolisme (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

• By the way, is there a handy way of dealing with false positives, such as $uga(r) or 1-4-3 (I Love You)? I could remove them, but I'm guessing the bot would just add them the next time it runs. --BDD (talk) 19:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

• Not really at the moment. :/ I generated the list as a one-time thing without the intention of future runs, so false positive tracking wasn't really thought about in advance... I'm fairly busy right now, but if I have a chance I'll work on something. For now... *thinks of easiest way for the bot to track false positives* comment them out? Sorry if this was an unsatisfying answer. Theopolisme (talk) 03:22, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Just a quick question regarding User:WP 1.0 Bot: Would it be possible to get the bot to run a bit more often during the month of December? There is currently a lot of article assessing going on right now, in large part associated with the WP:Stub Contest. The contest appears to be having the effect of motivating a bunch of editors to work on all of the assessment backlogs, not just stubs :) This is a good thing, but means that things have become more than a bit out-of-date, as the bot has not run in a week. This results in all of the tables being way out-of-whack with the actual numbers in the categories, and makes it very hard to discern at a glance how much work has been done. I realize it takes several thousand edits to update every table and log for the entire 'pedia, so am not asking for every day, but could we have it be more often than a week? Every other day or every third day or so? (Addendum: it looks like it last ran on Dec 7, and prior to that was Dec 5...is the week-long wait thing a fluke/bug?) Thanks in advance, and thanks in general for all of the work that this bot does! Dana boomer (talk) 01:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

@Dana boomer: seems more like a fluke with Wikimedia Labs, which the bot runs on (IIRC there was some server trouble). The latest data can be viewed at anytime via [2]. Theopolisme (talk) 07:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ultimate_One.jpg#filehistory Can you help me , here.It's violating copyright as it contains the channel logo --Winchetan (talk) 05:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

@Winchetan: Looks like the image has been removed already. Happy editing! Theopolisme (talk) 11:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. See WT:AFC#Moving article to WT:AFC after it is declined breaks the link from the user page message. Could this be connected with the change you made to {{Afc decline}} in October? JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey. :) I just had a look at Template:Countdown/testcases, and I see a few cases that aren't quite doing what they're supposed to. You're missing a few refresh links, and we could do with including the weeks in the countdown rather than just the years and days. Also, it's advisable to avoid generating script errors where possible, as editors tend to view them as mistakes, don't know that they can be clicked on to find the error message, etc. etc. Instead you can just output an html error with <strong class="error">Error: some error message</strong>. Although if you have an error that is meant to be seen by other module writers and not by editors, it is probably better to use a proper error as they are easier to debug. But other than that it is looking good - thank you again for your work. :) Also, while I am here, it is possible to call the mbox templates directly from Module:Message box - take a look at the instructions on the module page. Have a nice weekend! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 08:22, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Interesting stuff. Thanks for the help as always! Theopolisme (talk) 09:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't realise that you had fixed all the bugs so quickly. :) Everything looked ok, so I've made the switch to Module:Countdown. Congrats on your second conversion! If you could update the docs now that would be supremely useful. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 10:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

	Best wishes
	for the holidays and 2014 from a warmer place than where you probably are ;) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! All the same to you, and enjoy the holidays. Theopolisme (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

December Notes from the Guild of Copy Editors The December blitz ran from December 8–14. The theme for this blitz was articles tied in some way to religion. Seven editors knocked out 20 articles over the course of the week. Our next blitz will be in February, with a theme to be determined. Feel free to make theme suggestions at the Guild talk page! The January 2014 Backlog elimination drive is a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on January 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on January 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to copy edit all articles tagged in October and November 2012 and complete all requests placed before the end of 2013. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits at least one article, and special awards will be given to the top five in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in October and November 2012", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! Coordinator election: Voting is open for candidates to serve as GOCE coordinators from 1 January through 30 June 2014. Voting will run until the end of December. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95 and The Utahraptor To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Theopolisme! I, knowing nothing about bots, wanted to inquire on the feasibility of one that could search some text of an unreferenced article, and compile a list of possible references on the talk page. Wikipedia has hundreds of thousands of unsourced pages, and if a bot could at least suggest possible sources, we would at least have somewhere for an interested reader to go when our article falls woefully short of their expectations. I don't know how it would work, which is why I came to you, to see if you had any thoughts. Thanks, and Merry Christmas! Go Phightins! 13:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

@Go Phightins!: Hope you've had/are having a good holiday! The key thing to remember about robots is this:

It's all about the rules. Even highly sophisticated AI is just following rules based on conditions to generate more rules, etc, etc...

So for this source suggester robot, essentially all it would need is just that -- a list of rules. The question is, how is such a list created? What sources are deemed reliable? How does it find these sources? Searches? Of what? Through what platform? There are a ton of variables here, so it's difficult to envision something of this complexity posting static content on talk pages. However, I could foresee some sort of web service where one types in a Wikipedia article and it spits out suggestions (this could be a lot more modular), if that would be useful to you... The only way this would work, though, is if someone created a detailed outline of what the sources are and how they should be obtained (no easy task). Theopolisme (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

See User:Jimbo Wales#You can edit this page!, where Mr. Wales encourages people to add things that may make him smile, inform him, etc. Cheers, Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:35, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

@Northamerica1000: That seems more like it belongs on his talk page, then. And it didn't really make me smile, but maybe I just don't appreciate "biker bars"... Theopolisme (talk) 06:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Well, Mr. Wales states specifically in that section to add said edits to the user page itself: "You can edit this page! Really, you can! If you would like to, please feel free to do so. Make an edit! Make several edits! After all, that is what Wikipedia is all about." He also states there "Comments or questions regarding how this page currently looks should be directed to my talk page, rather than this page." So, I think it's appropriate per Mr. Wales' statement. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

This is a very interesting list, with some clear patterns emerging. Can you also generate a (hopefully much shorter) list of pages for which Page foo does not exist, but for which there are multiple iterations of Page foo (bar 1) and Page foo (bar 2)? Cheers! bd2412 T 17:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

You're right, that is interesting! I'll be on a plane tomorrow and will try to write the code to generate that list then. :) Theopolisme (talk) 18:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks! bd2412 T 19:24, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Theopolisme: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 04:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you for the notice. I did create the file, then uploaded it to wikipedia, I've checked the changes made by your bot and applaud the improvement. Good work.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2013 Annual Report The GOCE has wrapped up another successful year of operations! Our 2013 Annual Report is now ready for review. – Your project coordinators: Torchiest, Baffle gab1978 and Jonesey95 Sign up for the January drive! To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I am not sure why this revert happened. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

@WhisperToMe: Hey, sorry about that! Was doing a little work on a new mediawiki feature and accidentally hit the rollback button -- I reverted myself immediately. Cheers, Theopolisme (talk) 23:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for the heads up :) WhisperToMe (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Theopolisme. I posted an indefblock template on User:RupalDel six minutes before you invited them to the Teahouse.[3] Just sayin'. It may be a little confusing for the user. I don't know if you'd like to revert the bot? Up to you, of course. Regards, Bishonen | talk 20:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC).

Hey, Bishonen. I actually have no control over HostBot. It is operated by Jtmorgan, and some more information about this specific task can be found at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Hosts/Database reports/Automated invites. Essentially, I put my name on a list a while ago and it is now used in these personalized invitations (so yea, I could theoretically revert it but it seems like a more ideal solution would be for the bot to be modified to not invite indef-blocked users...). Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 16:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Indeed so. It can't be very nice for you to have it take your name in vain like that... Anyway, Drmies has removed the welcome on RupalDel's page. Man, that's a big template. It quite dwarfed my indef notice. Bishonen | talk 16:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC).

Hi y'all. If the block was 6 min before the invite, it probably wasn't enough time for the bot to get the message (so to speak: it checks the logging table for blocks before sending the messages, but there is usually some lag between block actions and db updates). Theopolisme, would you like me to remove your name from the list of inviters the block draws on? - J-Mo ^{Talk to Me} _{Email Me} 01:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

It's running, but can I make a suggestion?

I'm finding with some media it generates, that a description can be found by looking at the usage of the image, and pulling a caption from the relevant pages? Would it be possible to amend the bot task so it can do caption pulling?

The suggestion is to pull the caption from the page and then put something like Caption on : {article name}{caption}

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

It looks like Theo's Little Bot may have stalled on Task 22, or at least is running slower than expected. I added {{Rotten Tomatoes score}} to Micmacs (film) almost an hour ago, but it's still saying "refresh in a few minutes" as I write this.

If you could take a look and work out what's gone wrong I'd be grateful.

Cheers!

—me_and 18:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Looking. Theopolisme (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Just needed a good kick. Should be running now :) Theopolisme (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:IOS 7 Home Screen.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)