User talk:Svetlana Miljkovic~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Svetlana Miljkovic~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Rama 07:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi !

I've just seen the images Image:Brckic and ismic dead.jpg and Image:Rjsarajevo1.jpg, and I must say that I find their copyright status a little bit dubious; what makes you say taht these images were released in the Public Domain ?

By theway I restored the image of Sniper Alley, I know that it isn't that great (it was taken from a moving vehicle of the IFOR), but it's better to illustrate the article in the most complete possible way, and if the photo is relevant to two articles, so be it...

Also, it is better to use only "thumb" when possible, because "thumb|300px" overrides user's preferences as for the size of thumbs, and it may look awfully small on big screens, or too large on small ones.

Cheers ! Rama 07:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know about Serbian law, but in France or in the United States, now, a work is copyrighted once it is created. Mentions such as "Copyright (c) 2005 Foobar" are there to make this explicit, but are not necessary for any legal purpose. You should in fact assume that anything recent found anywhere is copyrighted under an unfree license unless it says otherwise explicitly. David.Monniaux 08:52, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am very much afraid that David is right. Perhaps we could try to write to the families of Admira Ismić and Boško Brkić and ask them to donate of photograph of the couple, but of course, this would involve some research.

For the images of the bodies on the bridge, I fear that it will be difficult to find free images (our best chance for this might be to find French Blue Helmets who would by chance have taken photographs of the scene, but this sounds really non-trivial).

I hope that you are not too disapointed, I know that these issues can be quite frustrating sometimes. Cheers ! Rama 09:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! Thank you for your message. I am sorry to have been the bearer of bad news, and I am happy to see that you do not get discouraged by them.

Do not worry about the article itself, only the images would be deleted in case of copyright problem. By the way, I will try to see whether something can be done using the fair use provision (but it would really be much better to have Free images, of course).

I am very much interested in the War in Bosnia, so I appreciate your efforts on the this respect. Cheers and see you around ! Rama 17:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ! I have modified the information of these images to claim them as fair use, if you want to review the rational, and possibly make it more precise. This way, the copyright information should be both exact and compatible with usage on Wikipedia. Cheers ! Rama 10:30, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, really. And if you are worried about something, do not hesitate to ask me (or someone else), we'll be glad to help you to help us ! Cheers and happy holiday ! Rama 14:06, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, pa di si ti! Ajde mi se javi na email, [email protected] ili ICQ (7366253), da se cujemo i vidimo gde je ko :) --Dejan Čabrilo 02:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sto se tice cirilici na Windows, mozes postaviti si srpsku tipkovnicu u Control Panelu.

Maine, je li? Mozda poznajes jednog mog - e kako se kaze na srpskom? - bivseg "su-klasnika" iz skole... --VKokielov 05:33, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Znas, previse vremena i...Necu ulaziti. Dovoljno je, da znam. Ostalo ce se projasniti. Mozda imam talant do jezika.

Nasi su u Maineu?! ZAISTA JESU?! Nikad ne bih vjerovao. Sto oni tamo rade? Pa naime danas sam citao statistike Cenzusa. Je li si, naprimjer, znala da vas (Srbohrvata ;) ) ima u zemlji gotovo dvije sto tisuca, dok nas (ruskogovorjaschih) ima samo (!) nekih tamo sedam sto tisuca? (Uglavnom smo Zidovi). Al ipak nas ima vise nego Poljaka, kojih ima preko sest sto pedeset...:) Saosjecam zbog cinjenice, sto ruski krije druge slavenske jezike sjenom...Djelomicno i zbog toga sam zapoceo uciti -- cinilo mi se nekako nepravedno sto Bugari i Poljaci su ucili ruski svi, a nasi kad govore poljski ili srpski mozes cuti moskovski "accent". --VKokielov 06:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ja cu prestati prelaziti medu "srpskim" i "hrvatskim", jer osecam se sizofrenicno. (A tako se osecam, jer latinica mi ide hrvatsko a cirilica hrvatsko ne ide. Ja sam idealni budala za vasih nacionalista, u ovom pogledu -- u potpunom sam skladu s njihovim shemama.)

Poznavao sam ovde neko vreme jednu Hrvaticu. Znaci setamo se Manhattanom, i iznenad ona mi rece: stoj. I cujemo...vas jezik! Olele. Pitam: odakle su? Ona kaze: iz Sarajeva. Odgovaram njoj: znas, ja zaboravljam da je Jugoslavija "such a big place." "Yes," kaze, "for such a small country." --VKokielov 06:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala na razgovoru. Ostat cemo u vezi, nadam se. --VKokielov 06:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lana,

Is response to your inquiry, as Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia anyone can edit; it isn't really possible to avoid vandalism. The only thing possible is to watch for it, remove it and warn whoever made it that he/she will be blocked if he/she does it again. We have a volunteer organisation for that, the Counter Vandalism Unit. We use our watchlists for spotting vandalism, by clicking on the "diff" buttons, we check what changes have been made and remove them. Some dedicated anti-vandals engage in what is called RC patrol and that means checking the recent changes section for vandalism. We are usually pretty effective, but there have been times when things have gone terribly wrong. For example, once someone vandalised the page of the Norwegian Prime Minister saying that he had been in prison for rape. It took us 22 hours to notice and correct that, how many readers do you think read that false information? Currently, the most vandalised article is George W. Bush where about 70% of edits to that page are vandalism or someone removing it.

I hope this has been enlightening,

Izehar (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PS there are other Serbian Wikipedians I have spoken to in the past - User:PANONIAN and User:HolyRomanEmperor (HRE is actually Croatian, but lives in Belgrade). You may also want to enter your name to Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro Izehar (talk) 11:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see that User:Izehar has already introduced me. :) Greetings, fellow wikipedian! HolyRomanEmperor 12:28, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sveti rimski car, moliću lepo. :) Do you need any assistence on a mater or two currently? HolyRomanEmperor 12:57, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nominovan sam za administratora ovde. Da li bi(ste) bili/a ljubazni i glasali za mene (ako se slazete)? HolyRomanEmperor 16:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See that for yourself. :) Hope to hear from you soon. HolyRomanEmperor 15:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the articles that I contributed (mostly me): Duklja, Zeta (state), Jovan Vladimir, Stefan Voislav, Mihailo Voislav, Lika and somewhat also Pagania, Travunia, Zahumlje and Skadar? HolyRomanEmperor 15:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Happy New Year! --HolyRomanEmperor 17:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:JZaritsky.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, best of luck with the permission hunting. Just please remember to ask for the right kind of permission. Unfortunately the "Hey, can I use this image on Wikipedia" "Sure" kind of permission is not good enough, we need explicit permission to actualy re-distribute the images under a free license. Permission to use is kinda like getting permission to use something inside your factory only (the en.wikipedia.org site is our "factory"), what we need is permission to include it in our actual product (the content we produce that is freely available (under the terms of the GFDL) for others to use, build upon or even sell, is our product). --Sherool (talk) 21:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought u maybe didnt know for this option. I hope no harm done:).... Luka Jačov 16:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Facwieck.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 19:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please mention the license information in which it is release, like GFDL, Public domain, CC, etc. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 17:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:John zaritsky.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

^{Copied from my talk page. --Sherool (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Hi,

I uploaded again the photo, after deletion, and provided the email that gave us the permission to use the picture from the owner of the photo! I don't know what else to add in order for photo to stay on!?!? thanks,

Lana

Svetlana Miljkovic 14:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this e-mail? I can't see it anywhere. Also what kind of permission did you get? Did you rely get permission to say that anyone could do anyting with the image, or did you just get permission to use it on the article. Unfortunately there is a significant difference and if you only got permission to use the image it is not free enough to be used on Wikipedia because our content need to be re-usable by other people too, not just on Wikipedia itself. If you do have theyr permission to release the image under a suitable free license please read Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission on how to log the proof of this with the foundation. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see, we are talking about two different images here. The e-mail is located at Image:JZaritsky.jpg, but that image is used under a fair use claim. I was talking about Image:John zaritsky.jpg wich was tagged with a "free use for any purpose" tag. I've just deleted the unused duplicate.

Anyway regarding permission be sure to ask for the right kind of permission, regular "sure you can use the image" kind of permission is just not enough (see this e-mail on the subject. What we need is an explicit permission to make the image avaialbe for others (re-distribute) under a free license compatable with the GFDL license (must allow modification, and commercial use). Hope that clears it up. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imaš moju podršku u borbi protiv nacionalizma. To se naročito odnosi na pomoć pri pisanju eventualnog članka u Vremenu o sr: Wikipediji. Moja elektronska adresa: copavi_zagorac(a)yahoo.com - Pozdrav!

Da li bi glasala na ovoj stranici za to da li članak o SM-u da bude izabrani ili ne? Glasaj, dok si još administratorka, molim te. Pozdrav. --Pockey 16:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Au, pa ja sam mislio da si ti administratorka, pa sam te zato zamolio da glasaš. Toliko se zapelo da ovo bude izabrani članak, a uopšte nije dovršen. Gde će taj novi članak o Srebrenici biti postavljen? Ako ikako mogu da pomognem, tu sam. --Pockey 21:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posle priznanja za vredno delovanje, dodeljujem ti i priznanje za demokratiju zbog hrabrosti i iskrenosti! Ikonicu ću ti staviti na ovu i na onu korisničku stranu. --Pockey 17:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was never on sezamnet or sezampro, but I was on SETNet, and wrote for Svet kompjutera, maybe yousaw my name there. Anyway, I saw something you wrote on sr wiki but it turned out that you have just translated it, that's all. Nikola 06:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. What you translated was completely wrong, and written in such a way that it was obviously written by someone who knows that it is wrong and is just spreading propaganda. If someone writes such things, he or she should not be on the list.

Looking through your work now however, I see that you don't follow your own advice, as you obviously have an agenda to push, and are pushing it on Wikipedia. To this date, it is not known with 100 % certainty who fired the shots, but it is greatly believed that shots came from the Serbian side. Right, if we don't know who did it, it must be those evil Serbs again. Not to mention that you implied that it is known with high certainty who fired the shots (not 100%, but maybe 90% or 80%...) while in reality there is not even 1% certainty, no one has the slightest idea who fired the shots. Nikola 07:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Hi, your problem is that "Marjan" is the title of a disambiguation page. Your link is rendered as bold text because it is what is known as a self link, that is it refeer to the page it's on. What you need to do is come up with a new unique title for the article you want to write about the lion, I would suggest Marjan (lion) (I took the libery of changing the link from the disambiguation page to this), that is typicaly the way it's done when several things have the same name. --Sherool (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The logo tag is only to be used for actual logos, so the picture of the biscuit box should not be labeled as a logo. The picture does not fall into any of the obvious categories so you would have to use the {{Fairusein|article name}} tag, combined with a fair use rationale. Consider how much the image would add to the article though, fair use images should only be used if they add significantly to the article, and only if no free alternatives exist. In this case it would for example be better (if possible) to get hold of a biscuit box and take a photo of it yourself (preferably from a bit of an angle so it's not just a "copy" of the box art), maybe open it up and pile up a few biscits next to it and stuff like that.

Oh, and don't worry about "bugging" me with questions. If you find it helpfull I don't mind answering the ocational question as best as I can. --Sherool (talk) 07:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words! I do try to please. ;) Tombseye 16:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, thanks. :) See you around. —Khoikhoi 17:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nadam se da nisam uvrijedio time sto sam napisao.

Ako jesam, reci. Molim. --VKokielov 17:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am replying to your post on the User talk:Pauk. If you need any help with Russian, write to my User talk:Vald. - Vald 22:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I was away from wikipedia for a few hours and just now saw your message. I see that User:Rama's Arrow already put a warning on that anonymous editor's talk page. In the future, when something like this happens, you or any other editor can warn the vandal yourself. See Wikipedia:Vandalism (shortcut is WP:VAND). The only thing that requires an admin is the actual block after multiple warnings. Once the vandal has been warned multiple times, you can post a message to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (shortcut is WP:AIV). That page is monitored by many admins and should bring a quick response. But again, blocks are usually not done unless a vandal has already recieved 3 or 4 escalating warnings. If you have any further questions, let me know. Thanks. --rogerd 04:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pokušavam da trpim koliko mogu. Izneo bih čitav niz zamerki za veliki broj neneutralnih članaka koji su sramota i ruglo. Nadam se da će postojati više korisnika sličnih nama koji će se u budućnosti suprostaviti nazadnosti. Pozdrav! --Pockey 21:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trazi se.

Koji god je razlog, nemoj nestati bez opomene. Mi smo vruci istocni narod i nerviramo se. --VKokielov 20:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary I left on that page was pretty vague, haha. All I was doing was replacing a link to Oral, since that's a disambiguation page, with Wiktionary:oral. :) Bwhack 14:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You ran into a very uncommon and confusing problem. When you copied and pasted the image name you somehow picked up a invisible control character (most likely) (notice the %E2%80%8E stuff at the end of the red image url you inserted). Try inserting the image again, if the same thing happens place the cursur imedeately after the end of the image name and press backspace, this will erease the invisible character (you should see no difference, that is the last "g" in the filename should still be there), then try to preview again.

Oh, and by the way don't upload album covers to commons, they don't accept unfree material (fair use) there so it will just get deleted. --Sherool (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moram reci, taj blog...;) Salim se. Ustvari, ne razumijem zasto se ljudi petljaju u tude stvari. Deset godina kasnije, tko jos uvijek zna sto je Bosna? Nitko -- old news. Medutim, jedan mali Izrael, ali ako neces ga nazvati kojim lijepim imenom, onda nisi muskarac. Fif. --VKokielov 03:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ćao, Svetlana. Verovatno me se ne sećaš, ali sada sam admin na srpskoj vikipediji. Nedavno sam čitao neke o tvoje članke. Odlični su (iako se ne razumem u to vrlo dobro) i želim da te pozovem nazad. Znam šta su razlozi tvog odlaska, ali mislim da se tako nešto više neće ponoviti i da treba okrenuti novi list.

Možda ćeš se naljutiti, ali moram da dodam da ni ti nisi postupila najbolje. Elem, srpska vikipedija je trenutno u fazi raspadanja, a potreban nam je neko ko će pisati članke. A i vidim da si duhovita, pošto nam je i to preko potrebno. :-)

Zato, molim te, razmisli. Mislim da bi se profesorka Snežana i Goldfinger jako obradovali ako bi se vratila. Poz. BokicaK 08:12, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Slažem se da sr: ima dosta POV članaka, ali to je nešto neizbežno. Uh... Srebrenica... Ne razumem se najbolje u to i ne bih da pričam o tome. Gledao sam samo neke komentare na bs: sr: i en:, pa ti mogu reći da su se Bosanci poneli prilično pe***ski, sa njihovim člankom-kukavičjim jajetom. Izvini, ali moram ti prebaciti da je diskusija o našem članku krenula po zlu kada si prozvala Manojla i dalje ti je poznato. U ove pola godine, sr: je preturila mnogo preko glave, tako da su admini sada prilično naoštreni ako diskusija nije u vezi sa nekim člankom ili ide po ličnoj osnovi. Takođe, osetljivi članci koji ne navode izvore ili reference će biti okićeni oni lepim tagovima (ovako ću barem ja raditi). Što se tiče sukoba, lično pokušavam da budem iznad njih i uvek težim nekakvom kompromisu.

Boris me je duboko razočarao svojim delovanjem i on je sada istorija. Za Nikolu ne znam, nisam imao ništa sa njim, ali sam čuo da je malo čvršći, mada mi ne deluje kao neko sa kim se nije moguće sporazumeti.

Čvrsto verujem da je srpska vikipedija prilično otvorena i spremnija za saradnju od one druge dve.

BokicaK 10:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aj se vratit. Aj Svetlana. Aj i ja cu se vratit, al necu bez tebe (bi bilo krsenje rijeci :) ) --VKokielov 13:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have lived too long in this country. Please realize that the Croatian and (God save me) Bosnian Wikipedias aren't any less political than the Serbian. The result is a "balance of power". You needn't touch it; you can't touch it. If you could, there'd be one Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia. The fact that you are a very proud exception to the general rule of factional division -- straight out of a book -- and the fact that you have earned your right to speak -- all that doesn't change the organic need for this power balance. --VKokielov 13:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ne odgovoraš mi, pa se bojim da sam te nekako uvredio, što mi iskreno nije bila namera. Da ne pominjem da kod imas dosta kredita :)A bura na srpskoj vikipediji je prošla. BokicaK 05:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few tools on the Toolserver that can give you the edit count of a user, for example http://tools.wikimedia.de/~river/cgi-bin/count_edits unfortunately they have been having a lot of trouble getting it to work against the English Wikipedia, theyr copy of the database keep getting corrupted meaning if you get any result at all it will be wrong. So for the time beeing there rely is no easy way to get an up to date count from this Wiki. --Sherool (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to do this for you, however, I'm stuck in mud. I'm at college right now, and I dont have my Pakistani CD's and cans with me. They are all at my parent's house. I'm going home next month, but that will be quite a long time. If you want some quicker results, I could refer you to some other Pakistani wiki friends of mine who do have that stuff with them on hand. They will be happy to help you more quickly. Nevertheless, I will put on some pictures, once I get ahold of what I have. They wont come on any time soon though. But if you need some soon, I will get my friends to help. Thanks! Take care! Afghan Historian 16:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		I award you this for your tireless vast contributions. PaxEquilibrium 19:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was about time you received some recognition. :)

I noticed that you didn't like the "National" Serbo-Croat wikipedias and how VKokielov mentioned that there would be a Serbo-Croatian one - well, there is ;D. Also, what precisely were the reasons for your withdrawal? --PaxEquilibrium 19:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Svetlana left sr:wiki because she was insulted by some rather shameless community members. As far as I know, those community members have gone or have been swept aside. --VKokielov 02:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da nije Boris Malagurski? --PaxEquilibrium 13:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Odakle sam?" Hmmm... komplicirano pitanje. Sada zivim u Beogradu. --PaxEquilibrium 18:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pa, niti sam toliko los niti toliko dobar da zasluzim taj nick. :)

Pa, bila je sinemanija nedavno... --PaxEquilibrium 16:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Svetlana. Sure I can help you. But since I do not know much about this particular subject my translation verges on verbatim. You might want to "beautify" the text. The Original was: Unklar ist, wie hoch der Anteil der Zwölfer-Schiiten (Imamiten) an der Bevölkerung Pakistans ist. Die meisten Schätzungen gehen von 15 Prozent aus. Sie sind in Karatschi, Lahore, Sialkot und Jhang sowie in den Northern Areas stark vertreten. Während der schiitischen Trauerzeremonien im Muharram kommt es in Pakistan häufig zu blutigen Auseinandersetzungen. Daneben sind in Pakistan zwei ismailitische Gruppierungen vertreten. Die Bohras leben vor allem in Karatschi, die Nizaris sind daneben vornehmlich in den Nordgebieten (Gilgit und Hunza) sowie Chitral (Nordwestprovinz) vertreten. Eine schiitische Sondergruppe im äußersten Norden sind die Nurbakhshis.

My first try is: It is unclear howlarge the proportion of Twelvers in the pakistani population is. Most approximations assume 15 percent. Twelvers are higly represented in Karatschi, Lahore, Sialkot and Jhang as well as the Northern Areas. Frequently there are fights and blodshed during the shi'ite mourning ceremonies in Muharram. Furthermore there are two ismaili fractions. The Bohras live mainly in Karatschi, the Nizari in the Nothern Areas (Gilgit and Hunza) as well as Chitral. Another group in the outermost north are the Nurbakhshi. -- PeeCee 10:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1- I believe you misread, I am not from Montenegro, although I am deeply interested by Montenegro. 2- I was in Maine the last time in 2001. I was in Ogunquit, Maine. The beach. --Petrovic-Njegos 13:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lana15.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 13:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ćao Svetlana. Pokrenut je proces otvaranja bloga naše Vikipedije na na Blogu B92, a sajt B92 je najposećeniji sajt u SRB i regionu. Mene su odabrali da budem jedan od glavnih izvođača radova. Kako nije jednostavno da sam pišem postove, tu su neophodni još neki ljudi dobre volje koji bi pomogli u pisanju. Da li si voljna da se pridružiš timu koji bi radio na tom blogu? Za početak odlučeno je da se piše o razvitku Vikipedije na srpskom jeziku (istorija i sažeta geneza razvoja.). Blog bi trebalo da startuje najkasnije prvih dana 2007. godine, a ispis prvog posta se mora odraditi što je pre moguće. Ja sam krenuo sa pisanjem i prešao sam uvod. Potrebne su nam informacije o najaktivnijim korisnicima, kao i o onima koji pišu isključivo o određenim oblastima, kao što si ti npr. :). Javi mi na mail pokrajac--a--gmail.com . Poz i srećna Nova godina! --Pockey 02:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Prvi tekst je praktično gotov i biće postavljen na blogu danas ili sutra. Dakle, ako si zainteresovana za učešće javi mi se. Poz! --Pockey 14:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:901030428cov white.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Svetlana.. I think I have uploaded the picture to wikicommons.. but it seems that i did not categorize it and add some information make it reachable..anyway.. below is the link for it in commons. I tried to update the picture but I can at the moment because the admins are doing something to the data base or something like that. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:DNA_Structure.jpg --A Obeidat 16:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

kaj od tebe ni zvuka? ali si se zgubila popolnoma?

u svakom slucaju pisem povodom ovoga: http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1611396,00.html

--VKokielov 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cafeclimb.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Svetlana Miljkovic. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Cafeclimb.gif) was found at the following location: User:Svetlana Miljkovic. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam imao jednu avanturu s srpkinjama u Starbucksu ondje gdje radim...ako ces detalje, mogu ih i poslati..smijesno bjese. :D

--VKokielov 17:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please note the discussion on the biased name for war in croatia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Croatian_War_of_Independence, which is proposed to be moved to its original title.

ja se vratio iz Zagreba. --VKokielov 18:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JZaritsky.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 19:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Svetlana, I replied to your response at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2007_August_22#Image:JZaritsky.jpg - go there to see what must be done if the image is not to be deleted. Thanks, Calliopejen1 22:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! The creator doesn't necessarily have to give up all their rights to the photo (which is what a public domain release is), but they do have to give permission for more than just wikipedia. Normally, the easiest license to explain is the {{cc-by-2.5}} license, which says that anyone can use your image in any way (even modifying it or using it commercially), as long as they credit you as the original author. A public domain release also works, of course, and there are a few more options available at WP:ICT#For image creators. For example letters requesting permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Calliopejen1 07:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And as an aside, the reason Wikipedia doesn't allow Wikipedia-only licenses is that Wikipedia's aim is to create a repository of content that can be reused freely, without any legal restrictions. So in essence the policy means that we'd rather have a gap, so someone sees it and uploads a totally free image, than an image that is restricted, and no one would think to find a new one. Calliopejen1 07:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

nadam se da si u redu, kao i ostala nova engleska. --VKokielov 01:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dmercury.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stark 02 800.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TIMEmagazine.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bambilogo258.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Danielamercury.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TIMEmagazine.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam jos uvijek tu! Bilo bi ne sasvim, potpuno lose ako bi se javila.

--VKokielov (talk) 02:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ne mogu ja trpit ovaj internet, jer nikada ne znas sto druga stranka (ti, ja, Kraljevic Marko -- bezveze) misli. Svetlana, ako ti meni nesto zamjeras, reci mi jednom i ja cu jednom tebe ostavit na miru. Visiti u vazduhu nit meni nit tebi ne sluzi. --VKokielov (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uzgred, to je bila samo konstatacija stanja. Stvarno je tako s Internetom. --VKokielov (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Boris Malagurski. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The easiest way to do so is to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Changing username. Thanks! -- Avi (talk) 16:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lana108.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lana1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 04:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

03:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

19:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danielamercury.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Danielamercury.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]