User talk:SurdusVII

	Deaf NA‑class
This page is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please stop edit warring. At least have the honesty to fix the individual articles and supply references which support your claims. Otherwise you are only harming the encyclopedia: purposefully contradicting ourselves is not appropriate. — kwami (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ntennis is no longer active. Do you have a reference for SSL? — kwami (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per il consiglio. Io vi scriverò sulla tua pagina di discussione. Akifumii^Talk 01:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sì. Io so che. Ho aderito ai progetti per le mie lingue già. Akifumii^Talk 13:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SurdusVII. You have new messages at [[User talk:<Akifumii>|User talk:<Akifumii>]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ciao Surdus, and thanks for writing! The reason why I removed "Trinacria" is that on wikipedia in English, per the WP:COMMONNAME guideline, we must use the Common Name in English: not "Sicilia", not "Trinacria", but Sicily. Bye, Alex2006 (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bacemu li mani a Vossia :-) Alex2006 (talk) 17:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ente Nazionale Sordi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roma and National Association of the Deaf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comitato Giovani Sordi Italiani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Association of the Deaf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! That article has an ugly history of referring to every deaf character in books and films as "deaf-mute". I understand the historical significance of pointing out the use of the term in literature, but many of the examples perpetuate the age-old misconception that "deaf = unable to speak = dumb". Best wishes! Sundayclose (talk) 15:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao SurdusVII, mancano le wikipedie che non hanno una propria pagina (red link). In realtà ci sono anche dei link blu fasulli come quello alla "Sicilian Wikipedia" che in realtà è solo un redirect. --Antonio1952 (talk) 20:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Deaf culture movement —has been proposed for merging with Deaf culture. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Wugapodes (talk) 23:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movimento_Indipendentista_Democratico_Repubblicano MISDR Republican Democratic Movement for Sicilian Independence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolorausch (talk • contribs) 10:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per risponderti sì ci sono, ma online sono poche, ho già scritto in User_talk:Antonella_S.D.. Se cerchi sui giornali specifici neegli archivi forse trovi di più. Ma sono incidentali. Sufficienti per avere una voce su enwiki (in questo senso per massima trasparenza ai patroller locali le ho scritto anche in inglese)--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dimenticavo: тамбури è molto simile a тамбурин, tamburello, che è una parola comunque presente qua e là. Nella lingua russa ci sono le declinazioni quindi i motori di ricerca interni sono flessibili entro qualche carattere. Se cerchi "тамбури" hai decine di risultati che c'entrano poco. Se anche qualche giornale salva articoli precedenti al 2000 accessibili, è una caccia al tesoro che solo chi parla bene il russo può fare agevolmente, se ha a cuore il tema. Io ero soprattutto curioso.--Alexmar983 (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Su itWiki non mi pronuncio, ma come ho scritto in talk non c'è nulla di sbagliato a cercare ancora fonti, nel peggiore dei casi alla fine avranno un bel lavoro da riciclare e pubblicare su internet da altre parti più completo. oppure da riusare su enWiki, dove la notabilità è diversa che su itWiki. Penso che su enwiki la voce abbia più chance, tutto qua, e di quello mi occuperò se hanno bisogno di me.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ho parlato di ruwiki, ma non la conosco bene e dipende tutto dalle fonti in russo. Per enwiki Wikipedia:Notability_(people) nella sezione politici dato il ruolo a livello transnazionale e l fonti in più lingue secondo me apre degli spiragli. Spetta a loro la scelta su cosa fare.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:14, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tutto il mio intervento è sulla diversità di regole. Comunque credo che il "non sono fisse" non può essere " a fisarmonica" con un certo autocompiacimento, e su altre piattaforme si evolvono in modo molto più organico. Su enwiki se provi a sciorinare i grandi principi per fare un po' così un po' cosà, ti butta male assai. Soprattutto se i tamburiani hanno l'intelligenza in un eventuale PdC su enwiki di non commentare troppo ma si fionda la gente su itwiki a dire no, sono questi ultimi che potrebbero passare per partigiani. Già accaduto qui e su altre piattaforme con altre voci cancellate solo su itwiki. L'autonomia dei progetti è un bene prezioso, responsabilizzante e duro da mantenere. Ma l'interconnessione è un dato di fatto. Farò loro guardare in dettaglio Category:Italian_activists e vedremo se con tutte quelle fonti anche se incidentali ci sono delle buone chance. Suggerirò di partire da una talk segnalando ai progetti competenti, sarà (se mi ascoltano) una cosa molto tranquilla. Se ci si vogliono buttare a capofitto, amen per loro.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For you small but constant edits on enwiki, thanks for visiting us! sto provando il sistema puccioso di ringraziamento, l'iconcina a cuore ;) Alexmar983 (talk) 14:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, itwiki è sempre indietro su queste frivolezze... grazie per il gattino.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Justice (disambiguation) because there are not yet any articles that discuss this series. Since disambiguation pages are supposed to direct readers to existing information, it's too soon for it to be included. Leschnei (talk) 14:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mondaze.tv, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SurdusVII. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mondaze.tv".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @SurdusVII:} I reviewed your article as part of WP:NPP. When you create in mainspace it must be sufficiently referenced if it is a WP:BLP or indeed any other type. Using just a single reference is not longer acceptable as a practice. I can send the article to draft. Once its done and you have updated it, I can send it back to mainspace if you want. Add three or more references to prove the subject is notable. scope_creep^Talk 15:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]