User talk:Sultanakan

Hi Sultanakan, Would you consider the Dave Crenshaw article to be neutral enough now to remove the advert tag? Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 11:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnmoor, I would like to consider it to make the article more neutral. Thanks.

This account is a sockpuppet of Arifhasan23 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

OK, thank you for improving on it. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 14:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra Torre.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 17:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The video game in that article is not notable enough. That's why it cannot stay on Wikipedia. I am not deleting the article. I just nominated it for deletion.Knight rider best (talk) 07:20, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra Torre.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sultanakan (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have submitted the page for second time but could not get approval of this American writer. She published her books and its true and proved. How to proof the her notability by other ways then the given references, please let me know. Thanks.(Sultanakan (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Sultanakan)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Citation Producer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 09:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AReputation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AReputation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 15:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on EpaperFlip requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:51, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I moved the article to your userspace at User:Sultanakan/EpaperFlip. The problem was that the article didn't establish how the company passes notability guidelines per WP:CORP. The sources on the article were almost entirely primary, meaning that they were made by the company itself. Press releases are seen as primary sources because they were written by someone involved with the company. Database entries such as the one at CrunchBase are considered to be primary at best since they are usually routine listings and many are listed by the companies themselves and/or contain information directly supplied by the company. The CNet link falls under this same category, as does the Softonic link, as they were both written by someone working for the company. The case study wouldn't be able to be used because we would have to be able to prove that it wasn't written by someone working for the company and that the article wasn't paid for or funded by the company itself. Case studies can be usable in some instances, but usually only when they're posted in places such as peer reviewed journals and when they're not funded by the company.

In any case, the article is in your userspace and you can work on it at your leisure. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sultanakan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Citation Producer for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. SFK2 (talk) 03:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Golden Meadows Kennel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The It Factor Productions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Stott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Stott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 22:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sultanakan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Natalie Jill for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sultanakan, Could you help out here—User:Johnmoor/Randy Gage draft—please? Thank you. —JOHNMOORofMOORLAND (talk) 21:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for abusing alternative accounts, User:Arifhasan23. Please don't even try to deny it, it's quite clear. We had an agreement that you wouldn't edit Wikipedia for money anymore. You will be welcome on this project when you choose to not edit under false pretenses. I wouldn't advise registering/continuing with any other accounts. Keegan (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keegan, I am not sure why I am blocked with User:Arifhasan23. This is unfortunate for me to relate the mentioned user with me. Is there any reason how I am related to the user:Arifhasan23. There might be a mistake. Please check and unblock me. I am strongly opposing it. (Sultanakan (talk) 20:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]

When you edit for hire, you leave a trail of self-published breadcrumbs on the internet. There is no mistake. If you'd like to appeal you can always contact the Arbitration Committee. They are aware of the published linkage between accounts. I will continue to block your accounts as you create them. Any further material created by you is eligible for speedy deletion. Keegan (talk) 04:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra Torre, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra Torre, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sultanakan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Alessandra Torre".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alessandra Torre}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 13:38, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]