User talk:Suhayli

Hello, Suhayli! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! CynofGavuf 12:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please discuss beforehand on talk pages. Peaceworld111 (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you not content with neutral article, expressing views of both sides. Why are you making it one-sided?Suhayli (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have not removed anything. I have only added and reorganised. From the text added, which do you think is not neutral and why? Peaceworld111 (talk) 11:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, you started to talk about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, which is a different article. This is the reason why I reverted. Also if it is with regards to criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, I would advise you to summarise it in his article in a sentence, and not put a whole chunk of mainstream views in the introduction section. With regards to detail of mainstream view, that has already been dealt with in the Criticism section, unless you have something different to add. Thank You. Peaceworld111 (talk) 11:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you are doing is nothing but vendalism. You have no right to use Wikipedia to express your personal belief system. Articles must be neutral. You are constantly making them biased, expressing views of one community. What you are adding is view of only Ahmadia, not comprehensive view.Suhayli (talk) 04:13, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat which sentence or sentences are not neutral?Peaceworld111 (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Qadiani Problem appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy and discuss viewpoints thoroughly before making any changes if you disagree about a certain point. Thank you. Peaceworld111 (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is strange that you are damaging neutrality of article and are blaming me. Suhayli (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I demanded you to explain many times, but you ignored.Peaceworld111 (talk) 17:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have mentioned subject book on given user_talk page for Cunado. Where did you get the book or how can I see it???

[of Sub-Article of Mahdi]

Thanks for response in advance.

Azgs (talk) 09:38, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meem Hasan Latifi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meem Hasan Latifi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bhaur Rajputs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no substantial sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:33, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]