User talk:Starstriker7/Archive V

This is the Fifth Archive, which was generated from User:Starstriker7's talk page. As each archive contains thirty individual commentaries, the Fifth Archive contains commentaries 121-150.

The date span for this archive spreads from 13 February 2011 to 9 May 2011.

The article Kepler-9 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kepler-9 for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your DYK comments. History2007 (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kepler-9b you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kepler-9b for things which need to be addressed. Jappalang (talk) 01:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am sad to say that your GA Nomination, Kepler-9c has failed because of the following reasons:

1. It was not well-organized.
2. Its info was not quite provided in a variety.
3. The text should be a little more lucid.
4. And most important of all it's a small article. Provide more info in the article and the article will be all right.

Thanks for asking my suggestions. Thank you.Ankit Maity 07:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As to the small article, remember that by the criteria we have to make it as broad as we can without going into detail that's too deep. For an object like Kepler-9c, I can't go into much detail because there simply isn't much about it. It is broad for its kind of article.

I could get another editor to help me fix the organization and clarity problems, though. It is a tad difficult for me to notice them myself.

For future reference, however, remember that these must go at the bottom of talk pages, not the top. :)

Anyways, thanks for your suggestions. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 15:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mistake. I did too much work that day and I had a hurry. I agree that there is not much information about that anyway. But let a little time pass, everything will be okay by then.Ankit Maity 05:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-9c, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that exoplanet Kepler-9c has an orbit that decreases by 39 minutes every time it circles its star? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 23:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-9b, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the exoplanet Kepler-9b's "year" becomes four minutes longer every time it completes an orbit around its star? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this contribution to Wikipedia SmartSE (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the New York state Assessment summary table, there are 43 cities in New York state with class=??? and importance = mid. Can you help with reducing that backlog of class ratings? Right now, I am working on Pennsylvania templates.--DThomsen8 (talk) 18:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd love to help. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 00:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Aruba at the 2008 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 0 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 16:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I have reviewed the article Kepler-11 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. The article is close to GA status, but needs a few changes and improvements. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 00:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a pass. Good work! —Torchiest ^talk_edits 13:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for setting aside the time to review it. :D --Starstriker7^(Talk) 07:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, I reviewed the article and put some notes on it's nomination talk page. When you feel you have accomplished those tasks just leave me a message, contact me with questions too. •Felix• ^T 00:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed the article and put a hold on it. Nothing but a few nitpicks! I'll check back in a day or so to see how the changes are coming along. •Felix• ^T 19:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kepler-5 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kepler-5 for eventual comments about the article. Well done! CrowzRSA 17:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pass once doi's or journa name/issue/year are added. Nergaal (talk) 05:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kepler-8b you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kepler-8b for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Jezhotwells (talk) 18:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have plenty of contributions that could be showcased on the mainpage. I suggest to keep in mind this options in the future. Nergaal (talk) 22:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually working towards putting the Kepler-11 planets on a combined DYK, but I will definitely keep it in mind on future projects. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 22:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-9d, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the small extrasolar planet Kepler-9d orbits its host star every 1.59 days? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 00:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-11b, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orbits of exoplanets Kepler-11b, Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, and Kepler-11f (artist's depiction pictured) can fit within the orbit of Mercury? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-11d, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orbits of exoplanets Kepler-11b, Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, and Kepler-11f (artist's depiction pictured) can fit within the orbit of Mercury? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-11e, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orbits of exoplanets Kepler-11b, Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, and Kepler-11f (artist's depiction pictured) can fit within the orbit of Mercury? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andromeda Galaxy seems to be well developed. Once you choose a target, use Andromeda as model. Nergaal (talk) 21:10, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-11f, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orbits of exoplanets Kepler-11b, Kepler-11c, Kepler-11d, Kepler-11e, and Kepler-11f (artist's depiction pictured) can fit within the orbit of Mercury? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page for Burwell, Cambridgeshire says that you assessed it and to holler if we want feedback? The article's nowhere near finished, and there's a listy draft in my user space that I'm using as a guideline trying to (very slowly!) rewrite it, but I'm curious how the article now stands and for any suggestions you may have? - JVG (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, that was quite a long time ago. It's been a while since I've really looked at a city article, but I'll gladly help where I can. :)

However, it is a busy week, so I can't guarantee I'll be able to really help out until the weekend. I'll put a few cursory comments on the side today, and I'll look into it with more detail during the weekend. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 04:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the swift reply and feedback! :) - JVG (talk) 20:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your name is at Talk:Branford, Connecticut. Could you please comment in discussion there, about non-notable natives section? I am hoping to improve the sourcing and content of such sections in other Connecticut town articles too. --doncram 09:22, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kepler-11g, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the mass of the extrasolar planet Kepler-11g could not be determined because its orbit is too far from those of its sister planets? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:15, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to close and promote this topic candidacy, but am waiting on a response to Adabow's question, if you could answer it. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:14, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. It has been done. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 03:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I looked at your DYK nomination for KOI-428b. I was wondering if you have an article for KOI-428 in the works. If not, I think we should remove the Main article: KOI-428 pointer for now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:45, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can get it done soon. If I do, could you help me incorporate it into the DYK hook? I never did find out how to do that. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article is done, and never mind my previous comment; I nominated it on a different hook. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 03:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cheers! BTW, I am not sure how to do a multiple-nomination either. Maybe one of the regulars would know more, like User:Dr. Blofeld. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:46, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. I will ask him when the need next arrives. :D --Starstriker7^(Talk) 15:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for the DYK comments. Would you like to consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia reliability? I can give you a good discount, given your review. History2007 (talk) 01:21, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, and my apologies for the delay; I'm not quite sure why I didn't reply the first time I saw this message... :P

I apologize, but joining the project doesn't really seem like something I could stick to. Thanks for the invitation, though, and I hope the new WikiProject achieves everything you hope it will achieve. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 16:33, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We edit conflict and we reviewed the same hook. I found a few issues outlined here cheers --Guerillero | My Talk 03:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, thanks for the catch. I definitely did not see that it was cited to a blog... :P --Starstriker7^(Talk) 03:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 9 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GJ 3634 b, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that GJ 3634 b, a recently discovered Super-Earth in orbit around a red dwarf star, is estimated to be over eight times more massive than Earth? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)