User talk:Spworld2

Welcome, Spworld2!

Hello, Spworld2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style Your first article I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 18:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)  [reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanur Assembly constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajeev Chandrasekhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyber police.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nava Kerala Sadas. Thanks! Thilsebatti (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of most-viewed Instagram reels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is unclear if any source establishes these as the absolute Top 5, one of the sources just discussed "some of the most-viewed" [1] rather than absolute Top 5. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. MarioGom (talk) 10:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

noted , This list includes name and video of most viewed Instagram Reels with its reference along with its direct video link. This reduces the possibility of changing it to draft and wants to change it in the main space Like YouTube Video Lists and Instagram Post Likes and Followers List currently Article Available category includes this, which is going to move to main space Spworld2 10:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-viewed Instagram reels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-viewed Instagram reels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 13:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After deletion of the "meme trolls in Kerala" thing, there appears to be at least two-editor support Freiland and me) for adding a section called something like "Social media" at Politics of Kerala that uses the better-quality ones of the sources you provided at AfD, to concisely and narrowly focus on use of social media (including but not overly dwelling on memes and trolling) by politicians and their supporters in Kerala. If you try to WP:COATRACK it into a "memes in Kerala are magically special" or "there's a unique trolling community in Kerala" story, you can expect it to be reverted. But if it sticks to just reporting the salient facts without elaboration and original research that paints and exaggeratory picture, then it would probably be useful. Some stuff to focus on: Kerala being somewhat behind-the-times until recently in this department, then over a fairly short span becoming very social-media active, especially in regards to citizen activism, and politicians themselves and their boosters using the Internet for campaigning, in lieu of street-corner rallies and paper leaflets. Plus two instances of governmental crack-down on socio-political trollers. That sort of stuff. Keep it on-topic and it will work well.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:59, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see article creation as a warning sound, I think Wikipedia can be a source for the world to know the truth about social media special in Kerala. I would like to include a part Kerala Social Media Politics in "Politics in Kerala" which has a clear source in this world, Hope more wikipedia professors like you to follow and post mortem on the slightest doubt, thank you for your great well wish. --Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 11:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spworld2. Thank you for your work on Lotus Lake Wetland Thirunavaya Malappuram. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Majlis Al-Noor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 25 § Majlis Al-Noor until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Spworld2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ayisha Abdul Basith for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 10:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Real Kerala Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Kerala Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Callitropsis🌲[talk · contribs] 05:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spworld2, thank you for your work on 2024 United Arab Emirates floods. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of our new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:The Real Kerala Story has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]