User talk:Sinopecynic

Statue of Thomas Carlyle, Embankment Gardens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Carlyle's Birthplace, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

Content plagiarizes. The phrasing is curiously (for a Wikipedia draft) redolent of the nineteenth century; sure enough, the first two nuggets that I happened to select -- "rough and unhewn as it came from the quarry" and "careful work of Signor Lucchesi" are well known to Google. Adding them (and, I'm pretty sure, others) without clear attribution probably isn't a copyright violation in view of the age of their first publication; it is, however, plagiarism. And if material first published more recently has been similarly filched, then that would be a copyright violation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruskin Monument and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruskin Monument, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sinopecynic! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 02:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Ruskin Monument. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:07, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good addition: English literature#Sage writing! But, more citations are needed.Rwood128 (talk) 20:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see MOS:ELLIPSIS. Wikipedia style is to use three unspaced dots. Please stop adding spaced dots, thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sinopecynic (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Carlyle (Millais) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle (Millais) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Thomas Carlyle (Millais) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Thomas Carlyle. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

— Sinopecynic (talk) 17:44, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sinopecynic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ruskin Monument".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Thomas Carlyle for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 10:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Carlyle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Thomas Carlyle into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thomas Carlyle and Talk:Thomas Carlyle/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Carlyle for comments about the article, and Talk:Thomas Carlyle/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since in your word it´s "unnecessary" for Thomas Carlyle what other individuals should have their Infoboxes removed. StrongALPHA (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I find it hardly necessary for anyone. For Carlyle in particular, I follow the example of pages like Richard Wagner and James Joyce, featured pages of figures whose life's work is so important and wide-ranging that the infobox is redundant. I consider Carlyle to be one of these figures, since almost all of his work is "notable," and his influence is so widespread. Besides, the format of simply portrait and signature is much more clean and pleasing to the eye, and declutters the articule by avoiding repetition. Sinopecynic (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We do have readers who never heard of Richard Wagner or Thomas Carlyle, and I like that you are now serving those also. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that you looked at Joyce recently ;) - Congratulations to your GA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you i was thinking about creating it myself today, coincidentally. I´m going to add even more to it. StrongALPHA (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Next time, when I have approved a hook, please add new ALTs only below. We have now a hook that nobody approved in prep for the Main page, because the promoter didn't check the history, and it certainly looked approved. It's a good hook, and I hope it is sourced, so I'll let it go for this time. But next time ... ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me, I am new to the DYK process. I am glad you approve of the hook and appreciate your understanding. Sinopecynic (talk) 20:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgive you, but DYK or not, - to place something above a signature makes it look as if that something was signed, right? - I like the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Carlyle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Carlyle (pictured) was the first writer to use the expression "meaning of life"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Carlyle. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Carlyle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

meaning of life

Thank you for quality articles around Thomas Carlyle, such as Statue of Thomas Carlyle, Philosophy of Thomas Carlyle and Thomas Carlyle's prose style, for diligently adding redirects and links to related articles, for a clear user page, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2868 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle's prose style you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Thomas Carlyle's prose style and Talk:Thomas Carlyle's prose style/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 13:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thomas Carlyle's prose style you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Thomas Carlyle's prose style for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]