User talk:Shafinusri

Hello, Shafinusri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Amanrajveer (talk) 08:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Amanrajveer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jamia nusrath, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amanrajveer (talk) 08:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shafinusri,

Thank you for creating the "Jamia nusrath" Wikipedia page. I just reviewed your article and I find it to have no encyclopedic value - just promotional and advocative content. You have made it look heavily like a university or college's own website. Wikipedia is supposed to offer an unbiased, neutral perspective and not advertisement-esque, Islamic content. I have marked it for cleanup for not adhering to Wikipedia standards. If you do not improve the article to give a more neutral standpoint, it will soon be deleted.

Hope you understand and will try to fix the issues as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully, Fmveatel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmveatel (talk • contribs) 14:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shafinusri. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]