User talk:Seresin/Archive 16

I saw you close Hub hub, at AFD and in the page log. The AFD was only open for 34 minutes. The rationale in the AFD was "delete" and in the page was "deleted "Hub hub" ‎ (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hub hub)", which indicates there was a valid AFD that decided to delete. I would have to disagree. I do agree with the outcome (and !voted in the AFD), but I don't think you can call that a valid AFD, and I don't think that it qualified under speedy (which doesn't matter, since you didn't close under speedy). Just concerned over the policy implications of doing that. PHARMBOY ^{(moo) (plop)} 21:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I speedy deleted it under A1; I believe when I clicked the delete option in the AfD closing script, it automatically deleted it with a link to the AfD as a summary. I've clarified why I speedy deleted it at the AfD. seresin ( ¡? )  21:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I saw where you said "Tahnks" in your summary here. You need to get those fingers looked at ;) PHARMBOY ^{(moo) (plop)} 21:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, added to the AfDs. If you'd like more info, please let me know. I think I read the consensus right, if you have a different opinion, I'd like to hear it please as there are always different ways to see things. TravellingCari 14:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised that you removed the PROD on this article. Are you really saying that Wikipedia should have a page on every CEO? I thought that WP:BIO indicated that you had to be notable, this person certainly fails WP:BIO.Paste (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily, but those sources are certainly enough to warrant a full AfD of the article, which you are, of course, fully free to open should you be convinced the subject of the article fails WP:NOTE. seresin ( ¡? )  22:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated HAGGER? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes. Thanks for your oppose vote in my rfa. I would agree that the timing of deleting my /noms subpage could have been better. The reason I deleted it at that point was due to the fact I no longer needed it and I was at that point reorganizing my user space and pages. I am interested to know how I could have gone about templating the regulars better. I tried to make them not very template like and tried to personalize them were I could. • If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy • ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 23:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar
		Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. —Mizu onna sango15Hello!

I see that you are now working on the "Arbitration Report" ("T.R.O.L.L.") page for the "Signpost". If you ever have any questions about the arbitration process or the status of cases, I'd be glad to answer them. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:56, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your offer. If I have any questions, I will do so. seresin ( ¡? )  23:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article was split off from the main article of the show he was in. Could you please drop by the discussion and change your vote to a merge back to where it came from, or explain why you are not supporting a merge so other commenters have the full story. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented. seresin ( ¡? )  23:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]