User talk:Scientist4U

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Replicator. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SFK2 (talk) 02:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Unified physics. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Unified field theory. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Unified field theory – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JamesG5 (talk) 04:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

== A page you started (Unified physics) has been reviewed! ==

Thanks for creating Unified physics, Scientist4U!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm redirecting this to Universe#Contents

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Actually, per the above notification, it was redirected to Unified field theory instead. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Unified field theory, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Unified field theory. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 22:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: your essay http://www.4ourbest.tk/ does not count as a wp:reliable source, and continuing to try to promote your wp:FRINGE wp:original research in articles will be treated as spamming. - DVdm (talk) 22:40, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]