User talk:RudolfSchreier

Hello, RudolfSchreier! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 17:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I am rolling back your edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK - I meant well, to only remove captions which did not contribute anything not already contained in Infobox titles, as MOS:CAPLENGTH recommends. This is supposed to leave more space for infobox images and other details. If this violates some other policy, please let me know. RudolfSchreier (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is unhelpful to the reader, whom we serve. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting the MOS: "Infoboxes normally display the page name as the title of the infobox. If nothing more than the page name needs to be said about the image, then the caption should be omitted as being redundant with the title of the infobox."

Please explain your rollbacks, referring back to this MOS guideline.

I'm also adding @LilianaUwU since she made similar rollbacks. RudolfSchreier (talk) 19:07, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna echo Beyond my Ken right below: they were mass changes against consensus. I wouldn't've minded if it was one page or two as a trial, but simply changing everything with no consensus isn't how you do it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 19:10, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I was genuinely trying to do the right thing and follow the MOS to improve article quality. I am unaware what other steps I could have taken.

Where the MOS says "enforcing optional style in a bot-like fashion without prior consensus, is never acceptable.", I was taking the statement quoted above, "...the caption should be omitted as being redundant with the title of the infobox" to mean "editors should make that change".

I am genuinely baffled what was expected of me as an editor. Read the MOS and not enforce it? Make the same edits, but more slowly (less efficiently)? RudolfSchreier (talk) 19:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not make mass changes to articles without first getting a mandate to do so after a consensus discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I echo Beyond My Ken's comments. The captions are there to help the reader. MOS:CAPLENGTH does not call for the removal of, e.g. captions such as "Quiche Lorraine served in Paris", in an article in which regional variations are discussed. Tim riley talk 20:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for at least being specific. Looking back, this is a change I also disagree with.

After this honestly (to me) incredibly crushing conflict, I'll happily end the discussion here and choose to disengage from Wikimedia. RudolfSchreier (talk) 06:59, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Drawfee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RudolfSchreier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:52, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]