User talk:Rockhead126

Hello, fellow-Wikipedians. Feel free to say whatever right here.

		The Royalty Barnstar
		For your work on bringing Elizabeth II to Featured Article status Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:29, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Elizabeth II know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on June 5, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 5, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Elizabeth II (born 1926) is the constitutional monarch of 16 sovereign states known as the Commonwealth realms, and head of the 54-member Commonwealth of Nations. In her role as the monarch of the United Kingdom she is Supreme Governor of the Church of England. She is also head of state of the Crown Dependencies. Her father, George VI, acceded to the throne in 1936 on the abdication of his brother Edward VIII. She began to undertake public duties during the Second World War, in which she served in the Auxiliary Territorial Service. On the death of George VI in 1952, she became Head of the Commonwealth and queen regnant of seven independent Commonwealth countries: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon. Her coronation service in 1953 was the first to be televised. In 1947 she married Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, with whom she has four children: Charles, Anne, Andrew, and Edward. Her reign of 72 years is the second-longest for a British monarch; only Queen Victoria has reigned longer. Elizabeth's Silver and Golden Jubilees were celebrated in 1977 and 2002; her Diamond Jubilee is being celebrated during 2012. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At Virginia Conventions, Mojohand and TheVirginiaHistorian are trying to advance the article to GA status. Any peer review, overall critique or contribution would be welcome. Thanks in advance. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 15:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I found your stub article for Peter K. Jones about halfway down my look-ups in the list of delegates at the Virginia Constitutional Convention of 1868. I noticed that you researched the material required for a “politician info box” there. Would you consider doing the same for those noted as members of the General Assembly in the Convention article’s chart of delegates?

Jweaver28 and I have begun to perfect the Chart of Delegates by creating bio start articles and stubs for the named delegates to give them links in the chart. In my first pass, I am noting the Virginia state legislators and their terms from Swem, "A Register of the General Assembly of Virginia, 1776-1918, and of the Constitutional Conventions”.

I intend to elaborate the bios with information for Republicans from Jackson, "Negro Office-Holders in Virginia, 1865-1895” as I did for Peter K. Jones, as well as information for the few Conservatives noted in Pulliam, "The Constitutional Conventions of Virginia from the foundation of the Commonwealth to the present time” (1901).

Your addition of bio stubs for the Convention delegates who were also Delegate and state Senator -- the Republicans and Conservatives not mentioned in either Pulliam or Jackson -- would be greatly appreciated to better complete the WP resources on this topic. Sincerely, TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 12:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding Rachel Brand! Marquardtika (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Muhlenberg Memorial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 11:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter Muhlenberg Memorial you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Peter Muhlenberg Memorial for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peter Muhlenberg Memorial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Muhlenberg Memorial for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KJP1 -- KJP1 (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rockhead126, I noticed that you recently added a D.C. Inventory of Historic Sites designation to a number of articles using {{Infobox NRHP}} and other infoboxes. That's a very welcome and long overdue addition. In response, I created the DCIHS article and added support for DCIHS at {{Designation}}, which allows it to be automatically updated in the infoboxes (example: Georgetown Car Barn). To take advantage of this, the articles will have to have the parameters changed to the ones used at e.g. Georgetown Car Barn. Would you be interested in taking a swing at this and updating the articles that you added DCIHS designation to? If so, adding Category:District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites to those articles would be very helpful too. Ergo Sum 18:34, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ergo. Thanks so much for doing this! Good timing, actually, because I was hoping to go through and label every NRHP-listed place on the inventory when I had the time. Changing the ones I've already done shouldn't take long. I'll add the new cat as well. Thanks again! Rockhead126 (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Peter Muhlenberg Memorial at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Coast Guard Star
		For your recent edits that greatly improved the article Raymond Evans (USCG), I hereby award you the Coast Guard Star. This barnstar has only been awarded seven times before. Semper Paratus! Cuprum17 (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honored! Thank you! Rockhead126 (talk) 23:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Mississippi Barnstar
		Thank you for creating the terrific biographies of Mississippi politicians. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Louis B. Costello you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louis B. Costello you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Louis B. Costello for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 16:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louis B. Costello you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Louis B. Costello for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Louis B. Costello at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Let's finish this up now. Please add the missing citation to The Lewiston Daily Sun and I'll call for a final review. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 12:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rockhead126 (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

You are recipient no. 2493 of Precious, a prize of QAI. - Missed your birthday by one day, sorry, and best wishes ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, Gerda! I really appreciate it! Rockhead126 (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

September songs

Thank you - and the many who helped - today for Elizabeth II, introduced (in 2012): "I think this article is almost perfectly written and is just about at the level of other British monarch FA's. It could use a couple of revisions, like in the header, but I think it'd be really cool to work out all the kinks by February 6 to coincide with the Queen's Diamond Jubilee." Great to see it again today, with images rotating. I decorated. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC) On the occasion, today I wrote an article about music premiered today, Like as the hart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

travel and strings sound --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda! Rockhead126 (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eppa Hunton IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eppa Hunton IV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eppa Hunton IV for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eppa Hunton IV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eppa Hunton IV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 01:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Elizabeth II for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. John (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valereee (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valereee (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Fantastic pieces of work with Eppa Hunton IV and Eppa Hunton Jr.! Among the best work I've seen displayed at DYK. Nice job - I look forward to more of your contributions. MX (✉ • ✎) 15:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the love, @MX! Looking forward to writing more articles in a similar vein — and maybe even trying to get one of my existing ones up to FA status! Rockhead126 (talk) 23:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robert H. Patterson Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive independent sources, sourced just to a family-written obituary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 21:48, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you still need multiple independent sources to establish notability. Anything else besides the Richmond obituary? Reywas92^Talk 23:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting some as we speak. Rockhead126 (talk) 23:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That should do for now, @Reywas92. I happened upon Patterson's obituary yesterday and, after doing a bit of research, think he's notable both for his work as an attorney and for his civic/political involvement. I had a good time a few months ago getting a similar article, Eppa Hunton IV, from creation to GA status and think this has the potential to be an equally fun project when I get the time. Thanks for all you do! Rockhead126 (talk) 00:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Elizabeth II (estimated annual readership: 43,566,103) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 08:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Rockhead126 (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - you recently reached out at my talk page about Thomas Spragens's article, and over the last day or two I've taken your advice and uploaded several photographs of Centre presidents from old digitized yearbooks from the Centre Digital Archives. Upon looking back at these sites, though, I did notice that in the "Rights" section, many of them (all of them after at least 1925, I believe) have "All Rights Reserved" as opposed to "Public Domain", including the 1972 yearbook you used for the picture of Spragens. Does this mean that the yearbooks are actually copyright-protected or are the pictures in the public domain anyways since the book itself doesn't have a copyright notice? Thank you for your help. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. Despite the rights notice on the website, the fact that the yearbooks were published in the U.S. between 1928 and 1977 without a copyright notice puts them in the public domain due to failure to comply with required formalities. Rockhead126 (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thank you for the help! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 04:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to thank you for your work on the Eppa Hunton IV article. I happened to acquire one of his works written for the Virginia Episcopal Church's history society and was really quite stunned when I found such a pleasant article. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: Thanks for the love! Articles on subjects like Mr. Hunton are my favorite kind to work on—notable but obscure enough that I really get to use my undergraduate history degree! Compiling, often buried, information and putting it on the first page of Google search results is what Wikipedia's all about! It doesn't get any better than when said information is comprehensive and well-sourced, too. I knew not many people would read the article, but would like to think it'll get a couple of views when U.Va. Law gives out their Eppa Hunton IV Memorial Book Award every year. Actually hearing from someone who appreciated it really warms my heart. Cheers! Rockhead126 (talk) 02:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eppa Hunton Jr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 09:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eppa Hunton Jr. you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Eppa Hunton Jr. and Talk:Eppa Hunton Jr./GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this edit; I can definitely understand conforming to a style for certain pages. Is there a style guide for VA politicians somewhere you can point me to? I thought 'state_delegate' and 'state_senate' params would be more specific to the subjects, as this is commonly used in other states I've edited (MD, WI, NY, VT). Is there some concern over adding details like caption to an image, spouse marriage year, occupation, etc. because it seems you just removed my additions without consideration. Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 12:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eppa Hunton Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eppa Hunton Jr. for comments about the article, and Talk:Eppa Hunton Jr./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:William and Mary Law School seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dabney S. Lancaster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly forgot about this one. I'd like to formally object to this move. Please move it back to mainspace. Rockhead126 (talk) 02:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]