User talk:RobertLovesPi

Welcome!

Hello, RobertLovesPi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Nunquam Dormio 19:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you sure do have a lot of userboxes. Thats cool. Not the Welsh one though.....nor the French one. No disrespect intended ofcourse. Sultangris 20:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think. RobertLovesPi 12:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your userboxes RAWK!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111one Ducttapeandzipties (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I most certainly will sample your userboxes the next time I update my page, thanks!Ducttapeandzipties (talk) 03:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think its cool to have hundreds of userboxes on your page. --Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia|wanna Talk? 04:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think its uncool to claim to be an emperor, also your face is uncool.Sultangris 00:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are actually fewer than seventy, not "hundreds." And, as far as coolness goes, it is in the eye of the beholder. Some beholders' opinions I care about. Most I don't. RobertLovesPi 00:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhombic enneacontahedron.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to France was considered unhelpful and has been reverted. Please try and be more constructive. Thanks. -- zzuuzz^(talk) 17:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would also say so, but seeing your userboxes, I cannot imagine you are the real originator of this modification, are you? See diff. --Huygens 25 17:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not me who edited the article on France. My guess is that it was someone else, using a computer at which I had forgotten to log off, so I will be more careful to log out in the future. My apologies for any inconvenience caused. RobertLovesPi 19:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Sultangris 00:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats this I hear about you loving spiders? Sultangris 00:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, he has a spider necklace. Ntchwaidumela 00:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am this earth's self-appointed protector of all spiderkind. RobertLovesPi 12:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wheres ur

Sultangris 17:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know there was one! I'll add it right away. Thanks, whoever you are.... RobertLovesPi 10:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, refrain from using the talk pages as a forum of discussion. It is against Wikipedia policy to add comments that do not further discussion, such as the comments you made about Captain America. Thank you. 170.211.137.6 14:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, he's right. Captain America should have completely owned Iron Man. Maybe not killed him, but knocked him out.

I'd like to remind you to sign your name using four tildes on talk pages. As for your criticism of my comments, Mr. 170.211.137.6, I'd take it a lot more seriously if you weren't anonymous. RobertLovesPi 15:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

d00d, ur wikipedia paje is vry lame. It is lik "d00d I'm gay" and you're all "lol i am"

Frenchie.

Well, Frenchie, why should I care about the opinion of someone who is obviously (A) a bigot, and (B) borderline-illiterate (I mean, learn to spell!), and (C) too cowardly to identify yourself with four tildes, as is the accepted practice on Wikipedia talk pages? RobertLovesPi 16:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

huh....i wonder who it is that keeps vandalizing with that ip address,Sultangris 20:42, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's anyone at a Jax High computer (ANY of them) who isn't logged on to Wikipedia. RobertLovesPi 12:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

haha, i shouldve taken more advantage of the interweb there.Sultangris 11:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How much harder is General Chemistry I going to be than your class? Is it going to like kick my ass?(This is Bruno, btw)--Ntchwaidumela 02:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be able to handle it if you pay attention. RobertLovesPi 14:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this invite to join the Arkansas WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Arkansas. Simply click here to accept! ChetblongT C 01:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I could give it a shot. But I can't say when it'll be ready. Ben 10 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably what you're looking for: Wikipedia:User page. Guettarda (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! RobertLovesPi (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I've posted a response. --McGeddon (talk) 11:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny joke, this, but let's not insult our potentially humourless readers, and it's not a wp:reliable source anyway, so I have reverted your edit. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 08:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In my own defense, that source was 100.00000...% accurate! However, the issue is not worth having an edit war over, and I concede you have a point about "potentially humorless readers," so you win. RobertLovesPi (talk) 09:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Welcome to the Polyhedron wikiproject. We have been pretty sleepy lately and could do with some new talent. A couple of things I would ask:

• Please be careful with sourcing. A fair bit of minor information has sometimes crept in without being reliably verifiable. This stuff needs cleaning out, not clarifying!
• Please treat animated gifs with caution. While they can be useful in presenting information, to some people such as myself the "decorative" aspect is utterly distracting and having the darn things flittering away in my peripheral vision produces some exceedingly unpleasant side effects. At least the tablets now stop them triggering a full-blown migraine. Even for useful information, such as a sequence of cross-sections of a higher polytope, a video which can be stopped and restarted is far better.

Go to it! — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobertLovesPi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobertLovesPi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobertLovesPi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of the Charles J. Givens page removed all of the Categories links. Was that your intention? BuffaloBob (talk)

That was not my intention. There was one external link that did not work -- and none that did work -- and so I was attempting to delete the "external links" section. I'll go revert the edit now. RobertLovesPi (talk) 22:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]