User talk:Richiepip

Hi, I'm Enwebb. Richiepip, thanks for creating List of weddings guests of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to your recent page; Wikipedia is not reliable without reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Enwebb (talk) 23:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jack Brooksbank, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jack Brooksbank, husband of Princess Eugenie of York, was not given a peerage following his marriage, as there is no general precedent in Britain for a commoner to be given one on marrying a princess? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jack Brooksbank. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jack Brooksbank), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Richiepip. I was wondering if you were interested in creating a separate article about the wedding of Princess Margaret. You had done a wonderful job in creating similar articles about the weddings of Prince Edward and Princess Alexandra, and since you're interested in topics related to royalty I thought maybe I should bring this into your attention. Let me know what your response it. Stay safe :) Keivan.f^Talk 06:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keivan.f. Thank you for your kind remarks about my wedding articles! I have just finished Princess Margaret's and will be publishing it now. Thanks again and stay safe:) Richiepip (talk) 20:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wedding dress of Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 20:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of coupled cousins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of coupled cousins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nihil novi (talk) 23:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings dear...you have a very good understanding of Wiki policies and have also voted at Afd's for many Royalty related articles. I would appreciate if you could provide your opinion on this discussion. Best regards 185.205.141.123 (talk) 06:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Bowes-Lyon, 19th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Bowes-Lyon, 19th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For Wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg. Great work! Peter Ormond 💬 11:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! It was a pleasure making it! Richiepip (talk) 22:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Wedding of Prince Edward, Duke of Kent, and Katharine Worsley to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Iamthecheese44 (talk) 06:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm a bit confused. I created the page years ago, in English, and I have not edited it since June, all of my subsequent edits have been in English. Richiepip (talk) 01:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg was marred by protests over Amsberg's German heritage and past membership in the Hitler Youth and the Wehrmacht? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

royal weddings

Thank you for quality articles such as Wedding of Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands and Claus van Amsberg and other royal weddings, for related biographies and places including a list of weddings at the White House, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2696 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much! I truly appreciate it! Richiepip (talk) 15:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Anglican church buildings in British Columbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip,

Thank you for creating Trinity United Church (Peterborough, Ontario).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The first three references in this article go to a wikipedia article. So notability - and the history of this church - are not established. Only the proposed merger and calling off of the merger are noted in references. So I now have to direct you to WP:SIGCOV - to satisfy this or the article may not merit inclusion. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: The first three references are not to The Peterborough Examiner Wikipedia article but to articles published in the Examiner. I will remove the Wikilinks in the citations if that will make this clear. Richiepip (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. Thank you for creating Jørgen Bender. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article on a designer.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 13:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. Thank you for creating Walter Blackwell. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article on a Canadian architect. It would be great if the article had an image of his work, and/or a fair use photo of him for the infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frances Campbell-Preston, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frances Campbell-Preston, who served as lady-in-waiting to Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother for nearly 40 years, was reportedly not hesitant to ask her difficult questions when others were reluctant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Campbell-Preston. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frances Campbell-Preston), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, St. Martin-in-the-Fields Anglican Church, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wedding of Jean-Christophe, Prince Napoléon, and Countess Olympia von und zu Arco-Zinneberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As the initial author of this article, I agree that this event is not notable enough for its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Lady Jane Lacey, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:DOB is a very serious part of WP:BLP. Toddst1 (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've created a discussion about the format of peers' names and titles at Talk:List of guests at the coronation of Charles III and Camilla, which you may be interested in joining. Thanks :) A.D.Hope (talk) 23:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Martin-in-the-Fields Anglican Church, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Martin-in-the-Fields Anglican Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:11, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip,

Thank you for creating Baron Niclas Silfverschiöld.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Linkrot and three or more sources are not in English language, please cite English sources as this is en-wiki.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Shelovesneo}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

shelovesneo (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Richiepip. I'm sorry to see you have deleted the WiR template from your user page. I find this surprising, particularly as seven of your most recent creations are informative articles about women. If you are interested in continuing to support the project, you might like to maintain the WiR tag and sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Remember that the kind of work you are doing also contributes to inspiring more users to write about women. In any case, I look forward to reading many more of your new creations. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ipigott:, thanks for bringing it to my attention, its removal was a mistake. I was removing a few I found redundant to clean up my page and accidentally removed the WiR template. Happy to put it back and continue to contribute to the project! Richiepip (talk) 13:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's good news. I've added your name to our mailing list so that you can receive notice of our monthly events. It would also be good if you could reregister on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members as until now I don't think you've been on our lists and others might like to see your interest in the project.--Ipigott (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Celtic nations Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 14:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timothy Craig Eaton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Craig Eaton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop doing this over and over and over. Their article names and the contents there should help you stop it. Best wishes, SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SergeWoodzing, I am well aware of the article title and the contents of it, thank you. I am also well aware that the guest list for Crown Princess Victoria's wedding published by the Royal Court, refers to Marianne as "Countess Marianne Bernadotte af Wisborg." Nothing changed regarding their titles between the two weddings. I am also aware they also refer to Sigvard as "Count Sigvard Bernadotte" on their website as well. Your edit summary implies the Royal Court does not know how to properly address a member of the King of Sweden's family. I suggest we take this matter to the articles talk page as I do not wish for an edit war, but in the meantime, it is my belief we should defer to the Court's styling. I am not advocating for moving their articles or anything of the sort, I am simply following the formal writing used by the Royal Court, as we do on guest lists. Warm regards, Richiepip (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you are nor familiar with our guideline on edit warring or you would not continue to make this change without consensus. Consensus in a controversial matter is reached before any change is made to an article and after discussion in a talk page is complete. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar and thus have not reverted more than three times. You are the one making a change to the article contrary to the way Sigvard and Marianne were listed in it since it was created in August 2020 without consensus. Richiepip (talk) 22:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286 Online events: New: Alphabet run G & H | Women in STEM | Geofocus: Sub-Saharan Africa Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon Tip of the month: When creating an article, check to see if there is an entry in the sister project Wikidata. If your subject is listed, the Wikidata information can be useful Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Family Order of Charles III, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289 Online events: New: Alphabet run I & J | Geofocus: Indian subcontinent | Women in Politics Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest Tip of the month: When translating articles from another language Wikipedia, don't forget to include attribution in your first edit summary. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292 Online events: New: Alphabet run K & L | Women who died in 2023 | Honoured Women Continuing: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Tip of the month: Avoid copyright problems by rewriting in your own words. You can check any article or draft with Earwig's copyvio detector. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. Thank you for your work on Church of St. John the Evangelist (Toronto). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you for your kind words! Richiepip (talk) 23:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296 Online events: New: Education (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Temperance women Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2023 Announcement In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part of the #1day1woman initiative! Tip of the month: Check out the new navigation on our Women in Red Project home page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi, there. I just want to apologise for my reverts to your edits on Wedding of Hussein, Crown Prince of Jordan, and Rajwa Al Saif and List of guests at the coronation of Charles III and Camilla, where you changed the links of Frederik X and Queen Mary. As I said to User:Keivan.f, I did not realise that you were changing the link, I thought you were changing the actual text, so I'm sorry about that. I hope you have a great day! My apologies again. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 01:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Therealscorp1an, it's quite alright, I appreciate your apology! Hope you have a great day as well :) Richiepip (talk) 22:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298 Online events: New: Alphabet run O & P | Black women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcement Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event. Tip of the month: AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301 Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Art+Feminism | Find Her Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements Celebrate Women – All content gender gap events, in every language Wikipedia, in March 2024 Francophone Women★ Writers Fortnight 2024 Feminism and Folklore 2024 Writing Contest Tip of the month: When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304 Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Gender studies | Health Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman. Tip of the month: If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our Tools and technical support page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Richiepip. Thank you for your work on St. George's Memorial Church (Oshawa). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chryssie Lytton Cobbold, Baroness Cobbold, which you created and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]