User talk:Rafajs77

Welcome!

Hello, Rafajs77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -zappa.jake (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've reverted your edits to the administrative divisions section of the Peru article. The division by departments is no longer used as it has been replaced by a division in regions since 2002. That is supported by clear sources in the article so I don't think there's room for debate about this point. Please don't change it back, unless you have a concrete proof that Peru has gone back to a departments organization. Greetings, --Victor12 13:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No hay problema. Nice to see you around. Greetings, --Victor12 16:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's a nice gallery the one you created for the Peru article. However, since all of its pics are about Lima, what do you think about moving it to the Lima article? Greetings, --Victor12 04:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the article and it seems the author tried hardly to prove Chavez is unrelated to Peru. I'll try to work on it, however it might take me a couple of days. I'll tell you when I'm finished so you can check it out. Greetings, --Victor12 22:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just finished a complete rewriting of the article. Check it out. --Victor12 04:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice pic of the Chávez monument, don't forget to ad a copyright tag to it so it won't get deleted. Greetings, --Victor12 00:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have by any chance a good pic of the Peruvian Government Palace. The current one does not look so good and its copyright tag is deprecated. Having seen your great pics, I thought you may have a better one. Greetings, --Victor12 02:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I've used them all in the Peruvian Government Palace and Peru articles, thanks a lot. Now for a second favor, do you have any pic of the front of Torre Tagle Palace? The one we have now [1] is quite a good shot but it is in low-res and has a deprecated copyright tag. Greetings, --Victor12 13:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I haven't seen you in a while so I guess you're busy. Anyway, if you have some time, you might want to check out this page Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Article improvement drive. We're having a vote to undertake an article improvement collaboration. Greetings, --Victor12 01:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Peru Article Improvement Drive. This month Lima was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

File:Esc-peru.gif

--Andersmusician VOTE 03:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, supongo que te puedo escribir en castellano, la foto que tomaste de lo que llamas el "Panteón de los próceres" está muy bien pero ése no es el Panteón sino la "Cripta de los héroes" dedicada a los caídos en la Guerra del Pacífico de 1879-1883. El Panteón está en el Parque Universitario y cómo su nombre lo indica es un homenaje a los próceres de la independencia del Perú entre 1780 y 1824. El asunto es que si no cambias el dato erróneo de la foto, el artículo que registra ese error en la wikipedia en inglés no puede ser corregido. Saludos.

I am very sorry about also reverting your edits. I could not undo the format change otherwise and the article had become a huge mess. gidonb (talk) 00:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Also posted on my talk page) Yes, it's the slums picture. If one picture is redundant, it makes sense to delete it. I'd make it clear on the talk page, though. Which two pictures? Hires an editor (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Barrancolib.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Barrancochurch.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:CampoMarteView.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Centrocultural.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:ChavezLimaMonument.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Congreso05.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rafajs77. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Pedro E. Paulet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]