User talk:Poydoo

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~Swarm~ {talk} 22:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Poydoo (talk) 16:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just as a note, it can be good to wait at least an hour before tagging an article for A7, newer editors often start by creating very short articles just to see if it works and then they add sources and content, like in the case of Alexander MacFarlane (judge). Anyways, see you around :) – Thjarkur (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. I'll make a note of that. Poydoo (talk) 22:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Only $1.00. Since you had some involvement with the Only $1.00 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to delete this film from the list !!!SAaphIrEblUE (talk) 16:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this at Talk:List of films considered the worst. Poydoo can talk and edit 16:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you recently tagged an article (now at Draft:Jennings Mill Country Club) for speedy deletion as an A1. Please check the criteria for A1 - it needs to have insufficient content to allow you to identify the subject. I was very easily able to identify the subject by sticking the title of the article into Google - that's not A1. A7 would probably have been appropriate, since there was no indication of significance, but you tagged it only five minutes after the author had created the page. Please give authors a bit more time to work on an article before tagging it for deletion. I've draftified it for now in case the author wants to resume work on it. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 15:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh - I just noticed that Þjarkur said much the same thing back in February - yeah, that applies to A1 as well as A7. Basically if it's not defamation, blatant vandalism or a COPYVIO, give them a bit of time to work on it. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 15:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why remove the NHL 11 fact from Darude Sandstorm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolanisntfunny (talk • contribs) 01:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. I just fixed the wikilink. @Synthwave.94: removed it, so you might want to talk to them about it. Poydoo can talk and edit 01:11, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Links to DAB pages must go through the (disambiguation) qualifier per WP:INTDAB. When you cleaned up Mason (surname) (this edit), you removed 20 of them and User:DPL bot promptly slapped a {{dablinks}} maintenance tag on the page. Could you put them back, please? It's a bit unfair to expect the next passing DABfixer to do so, and reverting would undo your good work on the page. Narky Blert (talk) 06:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've reverted my changes even though the sources are already cited. In the article's sources, there's the 11th source ^[1], referencing the fact that he was 22. Other print sources for him being 22 - ^[2] and ^[3]

Looking at 1920 United States Federal Census, for Brooklyn Assembly District 8, District 0424 , Frank Hayes, son of John and Margaret Hayes appears as 19, born in Ireland and immigrated to the US in 1901. There's another Frank Hayes that was born in New York and appears in the 1910, 1930 and 1940 censuses, but he doesn't appear in the 1920 one. He also resided in Brooklyn. Given the fact that he was alive in 1930 and 1940, we must come to the conclusion that he's not our deceased jockey.

Your misunderstanding arises from the fact that newspapers at the time printed that his age was 35 - in The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Brooklyn, New York, Tue, Jun 05, 1923 · Page 26 - ^[4] or 25 in Daily News, New York, New York, 05 Jun 1923, Tue • Page 25 ^[5]

Taking the census into consideration and the fact that he just graduated from "apprentice boy" ^[6], the conclusion is that he was in fact 22, not 35 nor 25. I'm not that good at editing stuff on wikipedia so I'd rather leave the reversal of the reversal to you. Thank you! Teo4all (talk) 12:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teo4all, the third (and 6th) source you listed here says he was 25, which makes two sources you listed that say he was 22, two that say he was 25, and one that says 35. The Frank Hayes you found in the 1920 census does sound like the right person, but your first source said he emigrated to the US in 1917, 7 years before his death in 1923 and not 1901. Of course, the article might be wrong. Regarding the "apprentice boy" thing, he would likely have been 22 or 25, but I think it could rule 35 out, unless he got into riding very relatively late. Poydoo can talk and edit 15:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poydoo, the first source here says he "came to Brooklyn" 7 years before his death. This doesn't exclude coming to the states in 1901 and moving to Brooklyn in 1916-1917. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teo4all (talk • contribs) 15:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Albert Griffiths (reggae artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://wbssmedia.com/artists/detail/4137. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hey Jmanlucas, I think this is for you. Poydoo can talk and edit 19:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Cayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Cayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you explained your edits the first time around... GiantSnowman 12:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry about that. I realized after I finished editing. - Poydoo can talk and edit 12:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Something that you added to Key West, Virginia in 2019 was referenced in the most recent xkcd. :) -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 09:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say that too. Thanks for all those underappreciated pointers that help our readers find the content they seek. Certes (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a first Lady she is notable herself so a redirect is not correct.84.167.81.194 (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@84.167.81.194 While she may be notable, until someone decides to write an article for her, the redirect I created can act as a placeholder. - Poydoo can talk and edit 19:55, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Princess Blanding. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 26#Princess Blanding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Smartyllama (talk) 16:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You made a redirect to her husband but as a First Lady she is notable herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlackSoul1 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
52		Pain compliance (talk)	Add sources
46		Gypsy cop (talk)	Add sources
100		EOKA B (talk)	Add sources
124		House of Representatives (Cyprus) (talk)	Add sources
56		Tassos Papadopoulos (talk)	Add sources
7		Black Feminist Future (talk)	Add sources
27		Gokarna Math (talk)	Cleanup
10		Polycarpos Giorkatzis (talk)	Cleanup
493		All Lives Matter (talk)	Cleanup
122		Descendants of Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia (talk)	Expand
136		Linda Sarsour (talk)	Expand
6,014		Woke (talk)	Expand
134		Nikos Sampson (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		History of the San Francisco Police Department (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
54		Bulverde, Texas (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
92		Cypriot intercommunal violence (talk)	Merge
9,320		Spotify (talk)	Merge
13		George Floyd protests in Pennsylvania (talk)	Merge
98		Torture in the United States (talk)	Wikify
89		Liam Lynch (Irish republican) (talk)	Wikify
357		Racial profiling (talk)	Wikify
2		Achilleas G. Exarchos (talk)	Orphan
2		Kyriacos Tsolakis (talk)	Orphan
3		Mario Pirovano (talk)	Orphan
6		Ludwig Haas (talk)	Stub
7		Jergé Hoefdraad (talk)	Stub
5		Yevgeni Pupkov (talk)	Stub
3		Peder Meen Johansen (talk)	Stub
2		Rosella Thorne (talk)	Stub
43		Emil Pálsson (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:03, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Poydoo: You seem to be most active member of WikiProject Nauru. I wanted to get involved in this WikiProject, but I've been having trouble finding good sources of information about the country. I am most interested in writing biographies of Nauruan politicians, but seeing the state of coverage of Nauru on Wikipedia, I would be happy with almost any help in terms of getting involved. RoundSquare (talk) 02:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]