User talk:Ponyo/Archives/July/2011

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

	Sunflower
	Thanks for all your work Span (talk) 22:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 14:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello again P. I though that I would let you know that it looks like our unsourced biography editor is back. Here is the latest IP 99.35.43.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). They've been gone just about a month but they are back to making a few housecleaning edits and then sticking in their unsourced info again. Hope things are going well where you are. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 03:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I was wondering when they would pop up again, it seemed rather inevitable. I have their talk page watchlisted and I will block them if they exceed the final warning given yesterday. Thanks for the head's up! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:12, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

This is to inform you that, in fact, Navneet Kaur is my senior classmates. I took every care of making the info neutral. Should I add the information that is sort of original research? Your opinion is awaited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kannanwrites (talk • contribs) 17:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello Kannanwrites - you can of course continue to add information to the article, but please ensure that any personal information you add is supported by reliable sources so that it can be verified by Wikipedia readers. My note regarding removal of POV edits did not apply to your recent edits - it was in relation to my removal of such words as "bombed at the Box office" "famous actor" "Megastar" and such. As long as the information you add is sourced and not "word of mouth", then you will be fine. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:03, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Ponyo, you recently deleted my contribution for the Article "Simon Fields" : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Fields

I was wondering if you could help me better understand the WP policies in regards to article creation. I have been trying to create a Wiki article for Simon Fields for what seems months now and I'm just understanding it properly I suppose. Is my article not properly cited or is that the wording is just entirely wrong? I would love any kind of direction you can give, but would appreciate if you didn't just point me to the Wiki FAQ's....those aren't helping me.

All the best, xhourspass — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xhourspass (talk • contribs) 01:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

It appears that you have submitted the article through Articles for Creation twice, where it was declined. I would suggest requesting additional information from the reviewers that declined the creation to help pinpoint the issues with the article. I can tell you from reading the article after it had been tagged for speedy deletion, it was rife with what is considered peacock terminology which affects the neutrality of the article; these words include "prestigious" "award-winning" (if the individual themselves is not the recipient of said award), "distinguished as a leader", and so on. Peacock words and puffery are promotional in nature as they are used to impart a false importance to the subject. If an individual is truly notable, the facts will speak for themselves. Also, it is important that the facts that you add are referenced to reliable sources. Although you have links to IMDB and Box Office Mojo, there is not a single link in the article from an independent source that would show how Fields meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. One of the best ways to assert notability is by including material referenced to reliable sources such as newspaper articles, magazine coverage, etc. I would suggest working on the article in your user sub-space (example: User:Xhourspass/Simon Fields), and working on it there to try to cut down on the promotional tone of the article. Once you are happy with the article, you could ask for a review at the drawing board to ensure any potential issues are caught before moving it to main article space. I hope this was helpful, please let me know if anything remains unclear. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Neuttro is very active in the local rock scene. Both albums were sold in stores and online stores. 2 Music Videos rotating in local TV (TVS)... Articles were on the news papers...Radio Air Play in 3 Rock Stations.. Most Rotated News Paper in Puerto Rico "Primera Hora" was on the "farandula" section printed, this is the online version: http://www.primerahora.com/sin_extremos_neuttro-346443.html The signed a compilation with Brutal Noise of best rock bands in Puerto Rico (Puerto Rock Vol 2) Brital Noise (label of Sol D' Menta) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mroxidizer1 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

The article was originally deleted as not meeting notability standards for inclusion in Wikipedia. You reposted the article without addressing these concerns. My best suggestion is to read through WP:MUSICBIO and re-write the article clearly showing how Neuttro meets the criteria listed there. This should be done in your userspace (preferably using the article wizard to ensure proper formatting). Once you are satisfied with the article, it can be moved back to main article space (you may want to request review from the editors at Requests for Feedback prior to doing so). Do you need a copy of the article? I can move it to your userspace if you would like to continue working on it there. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks I understand, so, You need a reliable source where you and people can check?, I will read WP:MUSICBIO and try again later. Peace. Mroxidizer1 (talk) 17:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer1

-record certified gold or higher in at least one country. This is the onky criteria the band don't meet, the rest, yes. Both albums never been "gold".. but, is possible a consideration?. The rest the band has done all on the WP:MUSICBIO criteria.I will like a copy of the article please, please can move it to my userspace if is ok to me to continue working on it there. ..Peace Mroxidizer1 (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)MrOxidizer

Note that the band does not need to meet all of the criteria listed, just at least one of them. The more criteria you can show that Neuttro meets, the stronger the argument will be for keeping the article. I have moved the draft copy to User:Mroxidizer1/Neuttro2 (User:Mroxidizer1/Neuttro was already being used for various notes and information on the band). When you are happy with your draft, you can request feedback from other editors to see if it's ready to be moved back to main article space. Good luck and happy editing! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

thanks 67.203.240.38 (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)Mroxidizer

Hi Ponyo,

you just deleted my article about SafeWallet. I also wrote a long explanation about why it should not be deleted. you have not responded to the explanation...

There are 18 password manager entries, many of them with much less significance.

Why was ours deleted? can you please explain? We are an established company for 8 years and the product has a long standing history.

Can I please re-enter the page and have published on Wikipeida?

Please let me know, thanks. dory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doryzi (talk • contribs) 16:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

After deleting the article I left a thorough explanation as to why the article was deleted on your talk page, as well as instructions on how to work on an article in your own userspace. The crux of the problem is that the article did not assert any importance or significance. If you can create an article that shows how your company meets the notability criteria listed at WP:ORG, the article will have much less chance of being deleted in the future. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 16:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I was on the GAC forum earlier and on a thread there, the wikipedia came up and not one of many posters had anything good to say about the moderators here. I know it's a lot of hassle looking at a link but if you had checked them, you would find why a number of links I gave on fifteen different threads are the same ones, as in there are FIFTEEN, count them, FIFTEEN photos linked to on the first page alone on MY forum.

And even if I were to waste a criminal amount of space and put them one per page, it would still be virtually the same link. Further information on my talk page. (Cyberia3 (talk) 21:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC))

Note: replied here. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:03, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Greetings of Love and Peace. The article on Princess Maleiha B. Candao and the infringement laws you have cited are the very links given to me by the Princess. The websites you named are the same websites I managed on her behalf. I would not post exact words if those were not mine. Please be informed. If you wish to communicate with the Princess for further verification, please let me know. Good bless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datu Oman (talk • contribs) 02:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyrighted text from another website must be explicitly licensed for use on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instruction son how to ensure the correct licenses are in place. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Our first article on C.H.Prahlada Rao was tagged for Speedy Deletion and got removed under G8/12 based on copyright grounds, with respect to the external site mentioned. Please note that that the external site is maintained by us, and the content is not borrowed!
Repeating the same on the site was however an obvious mistake that we didn't realize!
Now the content is removed from the external site with a shorter info, and the same article (since more descriptive and suited to Wiki in format) is created as a draft. But we are unable to Move it for review.
Please advice on how to proceed, whether the editors can access & review from the Special page on which the draft is created, or to submit under a different article name.

Chp.bym (talk) 03:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Note that it is not enough to assert permission to reuse text from another website, it must be properly licensed. Instructions on how to ensure your material is licensed for use on Wikipedia can be found at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you believe the new article you have written addresses the previous concerns, I would suggest leaving a review request at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback in order to ensure the article is ready to be moved back to article space. Good luck and happy editing! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Ponyo. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

 Chzz  ►  16:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Ponyo. Please could you take a look at this edit you recently made to Andrew Mackie. According to your edit summary, you were reverting a previous edit. However, what actually happened does not appear to match the edit summary, and some other text was removed. I was wondering if this was your intention, or whether the software did something strange because another editor was making the same reversion at the same time? Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 22:51, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

It looks like User:StaticGull and I edit conflicted removing the IP's posting of dating rumours. I did however also purposely remove the "Early life" section as it consisted solely of unsourced personal info as well as POV statements. I just removed another unsourced bit from the 'Personal life section" as well. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 23:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Can I ask you something?Ahmad4d (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Likely not, as your account has been blocked for disruptive editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Admin.

I'm Trying to create a Page with title - Unosys Technologies, which is not either a Spam or nor an Advertisement post.

Please review my page and make my content available.

Krishna.Bahadur.Karki (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

As I explained on your talk page, the article was deleted under the CSD A7 criteria - namely there was no significance or importance asserted for the company. I also pointed you to WP:ORG in order for you to review what notability criteria is required for Wikipedia to keep an article. What you have done is simply recreate the deleted article verbatim; the article does not explain why Unosys Technologies is significant in comparison to the other millions of companies in the world. Again, please read WP:ORG and show, in the article, how Unosys meets the criteria for inclusion outlined therein. Once complete you can request a review of the new article at Wikipedia:Requests for feedback. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I don't find any reason to delete my article as it is not advertising any content! Hope that you will do the needful and thank you in anticipation.

Best Regards, osman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osman909 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

The wording is indeed promotional in nature; unsupported claims such as "industry leader" and "long-proven ability" combined with peacock terms such as "renowned" are very promotional. More importantly, the text is a copyright violation of the Aotex website. Please do not continue to restore the article as it is currently written. Note that if you are at all affiliated with the company, please read our guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 01:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

	Thank you for your support
	Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I shall endeavor to meet your and the community's expectations as an admin. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

You'll make an absolutely fine admin Qwyrxian. Two bits of advice that have worked for me; trust your gut when things don't feel "right", and when in doubt, don't act - ask. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 13:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

		A tall glass of ice cold milk!
		I was going to drop a cookie to say thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page, but since you had just had a cookie delivered, I thought I would bring the milk! Many thanks for keeping your eyes open. LonelyBeacon (talk) 22:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

nom nom glug glug. Tasty! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 00:01, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the help the other day. Here is a kitten.

NCSS (talk) 17:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome, happy to help. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

You have saved me! From making an ass of myself while copy-pasting messages. Thankyou.

The Cavalry (Message me) 22:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

That's why they pay me the big bucks my friend.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.