User talk:Polygonness
| This is Polygonness's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Polygonness, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Your submission at Articles for creation: Peperomia weberbaueri has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
KylieTastic (talk) 13:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Peperomia warmingii has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Peperomia vulcanicola has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Recent Peperomia articles
Good job! Welcome to the taxonomic editors guild! *grins* J/K... though you may want to join one or more of the WikiProjects related to species you are interested in, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants. Anyways, please take a look at the few edits I and others have made to the articles so that you can see what shapes them up to conform with our general standards. If you think you can make future articles look like these, then feel free to edit directly in main article space instead of in draft space or your sandbox. If you don't have that confidence, feel free to ping me or other taxo-editors and we can swiftly move articles into main article space and spruce things up. Pun intended. :) Happy editing! - UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep up the good work! See my recent changes to Peperomia tungurahuae for some easier reference templates to use. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Polygonness. Thank you for your work on Peperomia uncatispica. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hi Polygonness, nice new article. I would recommend including it in appropriate Wikiprojects.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Peperomia tenella. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see the edits I made here. I see you crowed your accomplishment on your user page for how large this was. That was a false accomplishment. We don't care about size, and the article was bloated with an unnecessary list and incorrectly duplicated references. UtherSRG (talk) 14:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)