User talk:Pkr206

Hello, Pkr206, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Adhvik Mahajan, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  ASUKITE 19:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Asia Qualifier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haider Ali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - please refrain from changing the format of cricket tables for world cup regional qualifiers. We have an agreed format that minimises notes. Qualification details are added when teams confirm their positions. Bs1jac (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm StAnselm. Your recent edit(s) to the page 2025 ICC Champions Trophy appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add Bangladesh onto the list of qualified nations until they actually qualify. StAnselm (talk) 17:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Peter Langat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 17:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the qualification spots from the Africa qualifier page. It is standard to have these spots listed regardless of who has actually qualified, because it tells at a glance where the actual spots are.

Removing them creates more confusion.

Please stop removing them, all you are doing is making it harder to read. Basetornado (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pkr206 It is standard across Wikipedia to have them listed in Green. Please stop reverting them. You are doing nothing but making it more complicated to read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basetornado (talk • contribs) 05:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Abu Dhabi T10, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Cook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:56, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 2023–24 Big Bash League season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laurie Evans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2005–06 New Zealand Twenty20 Competition. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 T20 Blast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Final.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 European Cricket League has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced and no WP:RS online, failing WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 16:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop creating copies of articles for The Hundred seasons by using cut and paste moves. There is an ongoing naming discussion about this, contribute there instead of being disruptive. Do any more of these cut and paste moves, and I will be asking WP:ANI to block you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also stop moving articles like The Hundred (2021) whilst this RM is ongoing. Discuss this at Talk:The Hundred (2021)#Requested move 29 February 2024, don't cut and paste or move any of these articles unilaterally. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 European Cricket League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 European Cricket League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 European Cricket League. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Way WP:TOOSOON, as the event isn't for 11 months, and so very little is known about.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2024 European Cricket League. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 European Cricket League, you may be blocked from editing. The AFD had a consensus to merge, don't just remove the tag because you don't like it Joseph2302 (talk) 16:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at KP Oli Cup (cricket), you may be blocked from editing. BerryForPerpetuity (talk) 11:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pkr206. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Langat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Langat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pkr206! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]