User talk:Pjamescowie

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

• You can sign your name using three [Wikipedia: Manual of Style(headings)] tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.

• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 20:29, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I liked the info you added about Ken Livingstone. With regard to the headings, though, the prior version ("External links" instead of "External Links") is the approved Wikipedia style, so I changed them back. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings). JamesMLane 15:18, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hi there, Paul (or James). I see you just moved Ramses to Ramesses -- please take a look at Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page. To move a page, you should use the "move this page" command and not cut&paste the content from one article to another, because that way we lose all the previous editing history. It can be fixed, and it's not a major problem on a lousy disambig page like Ramesses, but it could well get you into hot water on a more controversial article.

Re the choice between the two (three) spellings, is that a layman/expert thing? Britannica and Encarta both use Ramses (which I thought was the more modern use, after learning Ramesses all those years ago at school), but I see a lot of Ramesses on .eg sites (SCA, Zahi Hawass). What's your take on that? –Hajor 18:01, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Wow, a professional Egyptologist! I look forward to seeing you rewrite some of my more amateurish and inaccurate articles on Ancient Egyptian affairs. Re replying here or there: I've been moving to the back-and-forth style (like this) of late -- it ensures the other party's going to see the message, and it makes following the conversation a tiny bit more cumbersome for outsiders. I've been having a look at www.ancientneareast.net/ too: impressive endeavour, well done! (Among the first things I noted was that your article on Ahmose is streets ahead of the one here...) Best, –Hajor 19:14, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Sorry for deleting your section, just felt it was not appropriate. Maybe a note about Moore can be included in another way since it is unique for Bush to get such a strong opposition from prominent film-makers, musicians and others and that this opposition is so successful in spreading its message. Get-back-world-respect 12:13, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Are you aware of the recently started Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt? We'd appreciate your input there, if you have a moment or two. Lively discussion so far mostly on the talk page. Regards, –Hajor 21:51, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hi, could you please add a note on Talk:Ramesses to explain why you moved the page from the most commonly used English form (which is the Wikipedia rule for page names) to something else? In particular, that page says:

The Wikipedia is not a place to advocate a title change in order to reflect recent scholarship. The articles themselves reflect recent scholarship but the titles should represent common usage.

Not that I particularly object to using the scholarly convention for the spelling (as you can see from my comments on the Talk: page, after I gave the carefully-gathered statistics on the most common spelling variants in use), but if you're going to not follow the Wikipedia rules, you should explain why, someplace where everyone can find it. Are you going to do all the pages for the individual pharaohs too? If so, remember you need to check on What links here and fix all the references, to avoid the extra redirect. Noel 17:39, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for getting back to us about that. I'll lend a hand with renaming everything into consistency, getting rid of double links, etc. Noel 14:41, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

How would one set about getting an independent confirmation of authencity on an ushabti. I'm planning on loaning one to the Michelson Museum of Art and they need independent confirmation (I'd kind of like one myself, just on to be on the safe side.) Its supposed to be from the Late period, I believe. I'd also like to upload a picture of it for the ushabti article, so it's relevant to wikipedia. I'd appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks. -JCarriker 21:26, July 11, 2005 (UTC)

James, are you planning to inform me (and indirectly, everyone else with the same concern) where you're moving my comment to? Or did you just delete it, thinking that my concern was too minor even to address?

The community portal should serve the community. Please don't sweep concerns under the rug via the Wikipedia:minor edit checkbox. Uncle Ed 14:50, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

Wackymacs 07:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week {{subst:IDRIVEtopic article}} was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

I accidently removed the AID tags the first time, but the reason the article tag was removed a second time (not by me) is that some people think the tags should only go on the talk page. May the Wiki be with you--ragesoss 19:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words, regarding my work on the Cold War. Who knows? Maybe we can make it good enough to be a Featured Article. -- Clevelander 00:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You voted for Rum Rebellion. It has been selected as the new Australian Collaboration. Please help to improve the article. Thanks. Scott Davis ^Talk 12:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You voted for Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation as Australian Collaboration. It has been selected, so please help to improve this article in any way you can. Thanks. Scott Davis ^Talk 15:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:43, 24 April 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

Thanks for flagging Diadumenos, Discophoros and Doryphoros as stubs. You might like to know that there's a specific stub category related to sculpture - {{sculpture-stub}} which will bring the article to the attention of people who can help, that bit faster than a general stub. If you're interested, Wikipedia:Stub_categories has the full list. Scottkeir 00:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posted by Pruneau 18:36, 29 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

I'd just like to take the chance to thank you for fixing up the stub, Woy Woy, and making it more encyclopedic. It was on my to-do list, and still is (citation etc.), bu you sure have made my job easier. Thanks. --Killfest2 05:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Davodd 05:38, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Flanders Fields Stamp (Canadian).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Peloponnesian War was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

AzaBot 12:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Wall Street Crash of 1929 was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive. This week Vladimir Lenin was selected to be improved to featured article status. Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just started an article on the Cyprus Museum and wandered if you would be willing to transfer the photo you entered on wikitravel over to wikipedia for use in this article. Cheers! StephP

Gilgamesh in popular culture, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Gilgamesh in popular culture satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilgamesh in popular culture and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Gilgamesh in popular culture during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 02:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pjamescowie 2002.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 09:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuschnigg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flanders Fields Stamp (Canadian).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pjamescowie! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 971 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Basil Hennessy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. David Ussishkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Shuka Dorfmann - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Bernie Fraser (economist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Juan Kouyoumdjian has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mjs1991 (talk) 12:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gil Stein (archaeologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability unclear, challenged a week ago and no response.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 10:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have now nominated this article for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 11:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Sir Herbert Thompson Professor of Egyptology, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Sir Herbert Thompson Professor of Egyptology" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vikings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viking art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Homer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of generic forms in place names in Ireland and the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Medinet Habu (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER): "Medinet Habu" is not ambiguous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]