User talk:Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded

Welcome!

Hello, Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Alexeyevitch(talk) 11:48, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.

January 2024

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alexeyevitch(talk) 14:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexeyevitch: why are you adding nonsense to my talk page, you moan about my name allegedly being a business when it's named after two Nicki Minaj albums (and quite possibly her next album if she does a continuation) now when I remove you from my talk page you say it's disruptive… come on, if I deleted your comments on my page I did so for a reason. Kindly stop editing on my talk page. Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, while your edits were originally in good faith they swiftly started to become disruptive when you started an edit war on this talk page. This isn't nonsense that editors leave on talk pages... User warnings are meant to guide good-faith testers and disurptive vandals. Also I suggest you request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, your username represents an album of Nicki Minaj which isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Also please read the Manual of Style and other guides for newer editors like yourself, editing Wikipedia is a great hobby and I hope you stay on Wikipedia it's a very enjoyable place. If you have any questions see Wikipedia:Questions, or ask me on my talk page. Alexeyevitch(talk) 15:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen people with names after album titles before and no one has ever said it's against the policy, so I think you're trying to make an issue out of nothing. Until someone with some sort of authority says it needs changing then I'll change it. Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean about "authority", "@Lil-unique1:" seems to agree that ethnicity and nationality aren't that relevant to the article about an album. Please give a bit more detail. Alexeyevitch(talk) 15:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I meant about my user name being changed, if you want my honest opinion, I think you're just finding problems for the sake of finding problems and maybe @Lil-unique1: could enlighten us with their thoughts on the ethnicity being mentioned or not. Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded (talk) 16:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66 and @gadfium are helpful admins and may be able to help. I am not here on Wikipedia to cause problems, when I first saw the username I thought it may not comply with the username policy. For example I saw someone doing a similar thing with Domino's Pizza many months ago. I myself recently changed my username because it read slightly like an advertisment when that wasn't my intention on Wikipedia and your in the same scenario aswell as you mentioned before. Alexeyevitch(talk) 17:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am a neutral (but experienced) impartial party to these edits. If someone reverts you, WP:BRD applies. Multiple people disagreed with you and asked you to stop. The onus is on you to get WP:CONSENSUS to support your edits as multiple other editors said no/diagreed with you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Best I Ever Had (Drake song). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Best I Ever Had (Drake song) was changed by Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886966 on 2024-01-16T17:10:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Pink Friday 2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Alexeyevitch(talk)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Akon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. dxneo (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Akon. dxneo (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dxneo: I added a edit summary TWICE, so why did you remove the edit? --Pink Friday 2.0 Roman Reloaded (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Akon.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pink_Friday_2.0_Roman_Reloaded&oldid=1215603447"