User talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive 150

Archive 145 Archive 148 Archive 149 Archive 150 Archive 151 Archive 152 Archive 155

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said ZebedeeHiberniantearsLear's FoolOnlyWGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
  • A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
  • A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
  • There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Editing closed case pages

Hello. I noticed that you edited your preliminary statement on a closed case. I have reverted you for two reasons. The closed case pages should not be edited by anyone except clerks and arbitrators, and secondly because the preliminary statements on the case page are verbatim copies which are considered an archive of the case request statements. This means that, as mentioned on the page, "they should never be changed". Please refrain from in future editing closed case pages and if you need to make the edit ask on the talk page or ask a clerk about the edit before making it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 22:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dreamy Jazz: I fixed a typo; please see WP:IAR and WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY. And WP:OWN. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Pigsonthewing, nope. IAR doesn't apply to modifying discussions closed nearly 8 years ago. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
[ you don't need to ping me on my own talk page]. I've read WP:IAR several times, and can't find that clause anywhere in it. Perhaps you could point it out to me? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Archives are archives for a reason. They exist to store what was said, and once they are closed they shouldn't be edited unless the change is really needed. This is similar to saying, I made a typo in a closed RfC from nearly 8 years ago, so I'm just going to go and edit it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
And the reason that I don't think IAR applies is how is modifying archived closed discussions to fix a minor typo from 8 years ago "improving or maintaining Wikipedia"? Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
[ec] So the clause is not in WP:IAR. Please cease trying to invent rules. Your analogy is fundamentally flawed: simple typos such as this should equally be corrected in RfCs. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, we will have to agree to disagree with editing archives. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hello from the birds! --AnneJerry (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Thanks for the session. --Arans9 (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Not good link text?! How dare you!

Haha, well spotted here! I don't know what the h*ll I thought I was doing there – probably trying to do what you actually did do to fix it. But thanks very much for sorting out my error. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:24, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #458

Tech News: 2021-10

17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2021



This Month in GLAM – Volume XI, Issue II, February 2021


Headlines
  • Albania report: Recruiting two PMs; Budget Report 2020; Wikipedia 20th Bday
  • Australia report: Who do we think we are?
  • Brazil report: New GLAM tutorials in Portuguese
  • Estonia report: WikiMuseum
  • Finland report: Focus on learning
  • Indonesia report: PD Day 2021 in Indonesia, #1lib1ref, Wikisource workshop
  • Netherlands report: Historical Maps; Share your Data on colonial heritage; Knowledge platform for heritage institutions
  • Serbia report: Amazing results of the January #1Lib1Ref campaign
  • Sweden report: Medieval ballads; Project HBTQI
  • Switzerland report: 50 Years Women's Suffrage in Switzerland & More
  • UK report: Khalili Collections
  • USA report: Black History Month and Smithsonian anniversary
  • WMF GLAM report: Project Grants, Analytics for GLAMs, and Shared Citations
  • Calendar: March's GLAM events
Read this edition in full • Single-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 16:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shirley Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pornographer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #459

Tech News: 2021-11

23:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Gem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sutton Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

  • New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
  • 1Lib1Ref
  • Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-12

16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #460

April editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Association of Nutritional Consultants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Association of Nutritional Consultants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— BarrelProof (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Comrade I am kindly requesting for your expertise review the recently submitted REASON AS THE WORLD MASTERPIECE. Thank you very much in advance.Ibitukirire (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Thank very much Andy for your selfless edits. God bless you abundantly. Ibitukirire (talk) 07:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you ...

... for improving articles in March! On Bach's birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Today: Bach's cantata composed for today, - perhaps listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello

Hello a

Hi Andy, today is a nice day, isn't it? --BhusalAyush (talk) 15:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello b

Hi Andy, Nice Day. Great Training Session. --EmaPG (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

hello c

Hello Andy. --Twishapambhar (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

hello d

Hi Andy, thankyou for the workshop. --Twishapambhar (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

hello e

Hi Andy, Thankyou for helping out. --Twishapambhar (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello f

Hi Andy, have a great day. --Lyrasx (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello g

Hi Andy, what a lovely day it is. --The wandering elephant (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello h

Hi Andy, how are you? --Ashpanda (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pigsonthewing/Archive_150&oldid=1016995048"