User talk:PeterAndrewL

Hello, I'm Arxiloxos. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Maya Gabeira, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, PeterAndrewL. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Buster Seven Talk 18:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Levin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of NFL players with chronic traumatic encephalopathy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lantau Trail may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• locals. The suggested alternate route leaves the '''Lantau Trail'' right after distance post 059 (and immediately before Na Ying Kok campsite and rejoins the trail near distance post 073.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of NFL players with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to David Thompson, Michael Myers, Steve Jones, Edward White, Robert Bell, Anthony Hancock, James Smith, John Fitzgerald, Henry Lawrence, Joseph Johnston, John Sullivan, Anthony Martin, David Palmer, William Graham, Richard Ellis, Richard Stevens, James Harrell, James Jones, Terry Brown, Ronald Brown, Philip Smith, James Williams, Eddie Lewis, William Story, Jeff Smith, Eric Wright, David Hughes, James Jackson, David Hill, John Richards, Robert Woods, John Avery, John Griffin, James Hall, Anthony Johnson, John Johnson, Douglas Jones, James Arnold, George Curry, Charlie Smith, Willie Jones, Steve Nelson, Jack Johnson, Steve Wilson, Randy White, Charles Thomas, Chuck Thomas, Scott Williams, William Cooke, Charles Brown, Raymond Brown, Pete Mitchell, Sean Ryan, Edward Brown, David Alexander, Frank Ryan, George Rogers, Mike Richardson, William Roberts, Thomas Lewis, Dave Smith, Robert Edwards, Mark Robinson, Brian Noble, Robert Butler, Robert Grant, Steve Wallace, Gordon Smith, Mitchell Johnson, Richard Young, Mark Fields, Roy Foster, Jack Snow, Joe Harris, Edward Simmons, Mark Murphy, Kevin Lewis, Robert Harris, Dennis Smith, Chris Warren, Fred Anderson, Thomas Henderson, Kevin Brooks, Ernest Gibson, Keith Adams, Rob Johnson, Scott Jackson, Anthony Jones, John Jennings, Jerry Smith, Roger Taylor, Tom Cox, Gregory Boyd, Steve Wright, Marvin Jones, Robert Miller, Tom Curtis, Anthony Miller, Mike Banks, Marc Edwards, Steve Foley, Derek Price, Kim Anderson, Thomas Jeter, David Knight, Russell Davis, Andrew Stewart, Michael Evans, John H. Smith, Gregory Brown, Eugene Taylor, Edward Cooke, Guy Green, Donald Wilson, Kevin Turner, Mike Wood, Johnny Davis, Ben Smith, Khalid Abdullah, Tony Smith, Mike McCoy, Eddie Wilson, James McMahon, Charles Weaver, Mark Collins, Paul Shields, Ron Heller, Patrick Heenan, Bill Bishop, James Jensen, Dave Moore, Jason Phillips, Danny Miller, Matt Robinson, Richard Jackson, Michael Freeman, Bob Berry, Paul Green, Roger Brown, Gary Jones, Ernest Dixon, Edward Ellis, Daniel Sullivan, D.D. Lewis, Reggie Brown, Reginald Brown, Anthony Thompson, Ryan Stewart, Dexter Jackson, Gregory Taylor, Billy Bell, Kenneth King, Carl Miller, Mark Nichols, John Houser, Russ Smith, William Bain, Joe Burns, Mark Cooper, Michael Brooks, Randy Robbins, Matt Joyce, Anthony Thomas, Douglas Martin, Hugh Green, Robert Bailey, James Burgess, Jeff Hart, Stephen Clark, Shawn King, Keith Jennings, William Daniel, Richard Palmer, David Grayson, Michael Mosley, Thomas Sherman, Paul Carrington, Paul Howard, Michael Mason, Kenneth Davis, Andrew Glover, John Smith, Sam Simmons, William Carr, Kevin Sargent, Dana Howard, Charles Anthony, Kevin Thomas, Chris Walsh, Leonard Harris, Frank Garcia, Donald Jones, Arthur Stringer, Craig Powell, Joe Krakoski, William Austin, John Brewer, Vincent Clark, Arthur Cox, Troy Wilson, Terry Gray, Michael Morton, Bruce Walker, Anthony Marshall, David Long, David Sims, Robert Abraham, Earl Thomas, Edward Bell, Chad Brown, Clinton Jones, Michael Butler, Barry Foster, John Sawyer, Aaron Mitchell, Matt Martin, Danny Noonan, Al Harris, Chris Williams, Fred Forsberg, Frank Collins, Thomas McDonald, Frank Lewis, James Barton, Greg Lloyd, David Sloan, Keith Hamilton, Brent Williams, Jay Foreman, Eric Lane, Byron Williams, Patrick Shea, Kenneth Davidson, Barry Stokes, Christopher Barber, Alfred Anderson, Timothy Fox, Keith Griffin, Raymond Butler, Jonathan Carter, David Lewis, Maurice Hurst, Terry Ray, Joshua Norman, Jeff Donaldson, Wayne Clark, Keith Ferguson, Randy Clark, Malcolm Walker, Walter Roberts, Anthony Newman, Mark Pattison, Darryl Williams, Dwight Stone, Glen Collins, Michael Carter, Jay Taylor, Frank Hartley and Aaron Brown

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the ref say it is rarely given to kids [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort Lee, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Public Announcement on Lantau Trail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterAndrewL. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterAndrewL. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Erickson (politics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Erickson (politics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 22:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rob Goldstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligence Committee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterAndrewL,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Elmer Stewart Rhodes should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elmer Stewart Rhodes .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sam Nunberg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:24, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have violated the discretionary sanctions on The Trump Organization by reinstating your edits after they have been challenged by two editors. Please self-revert. Anyway, you are relying on a legalistic definition of "company" that does not comport with usage in reliable sources. A company does not necessarily have to comprise exactly one business entity. Toohool (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you forgot the discretionaary sanctions warning that NeilN left you last month? You're now edit warring to restore BLP-violating content at Sean Hannity, while a discussion is ongoing at Talk:Sean Hannity about this very material. I suggest you self-revert before someone seeks administrative sanctions. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jacob Wohl, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Wohl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Wohl (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 19:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Liuba Grechen Shirley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liuba Grechen Shirley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liuba Grechen Shirley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterAndrewL. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tony Montana (filmmaker) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage of career/person in reliable independent sources. Only claim to notability is WP:INHERITED from Kevin Spacey.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 01:28, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, David Correia (political operative), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David Correia (political operative), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterAndrewL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Correia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]