User talk:Pegship/Archive2021-Mar2023

Please assume good faith.

Thanks for uploading File:Belphegorpbk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Freaked Out. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 11#Freaked out until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 12:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to trouble you. I proposed a stub 5 days ago, which you kindly supported. Since it's been 5 days I've gone ahead and created it but I'm not sure whether I should close the proposal myself or leave it for someone else to do? Ingratis (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, @Ingratis:! Usually one of our stub sorting housekeepers (such as myself) closes the discussions, but you are welcome to do so when appropriate. I'll take care of it. Her Pegship (?) 22:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks very much! I'll remember for next time. Ingratis (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pegship. You helped me start a new stub last summer about Canadian politicians. I've got another question. There's a category for court cases in Canada by year. I can't figure out how to add new sub-categories for a new year. For example, I recently was working on a court decision from 1910, but I don't see how to start a sub-category for 1910 within the main category. Can you give me some pointers? Here's the link to the Category: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1899_in_Canadian_case_law If you don't know how to do it, could you pass the inquiry on to someone who might? Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I figured it out!

Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be grateful for your opinion: I recently proposed and created Category:French novelist stubs, which totalled several hundreds, so I then proposed and created sub-cats Category:French novelist, 19th-century birth stubs and Category:French novelist, 20th-century birth stubs. However, most of the French novelist stubs were 19th or 20th century births, so after populating the sub-cats there are only 33 stubs left in the category first created. Can I just leave it, or have I got to find another c.30 stubs to bring it back up to 60? (I think it might be a struggle to do that) or does it have to be upmerged back into Category:French writers? if I don't do either, is it likely to be deleted? Ingratis (talk) 22:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingratis: - 33 stubs is fine! You don't have to fill it up - 60 is just the "critical mass" that creates a need for sub-cats. Chances are it will either grow on its own or people will actually edit articles to reach non-stub status. At any rate, your work on this category is done. Thanks. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to be off the hook! thanks very much for explaining. Ingratis (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Your recent edits to Template:Very large stub category has resulted with "</noinclude>" being added to the transcluded categories (see Category:2000s single stubs as an example). I tried to fix it, but I could not get the desired result. Do you think you could take a look? Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A token of thanks Hi Pegship! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sf-char-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Stub template redirects has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have also pretty much populated this category. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you might want to check out user:BrandonXLF/HotDefaultSort – pretty helpful for adding sortkeys. 1234 kb of .rar files (is this dangerous?) 01:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, please take care when copying big sets of pages between categories with tools like this, since this can introduce errors or categorisation policy violations en masse – it looks like all of these edits were essentially reverts of your actions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:30, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eek. I'm so sorry - I got a bit overenthusiastic there. Thanks for the cleanup. Her Pegship (?) 02:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, since you commented. I edited the redirect for Ancillariidae stubs. There is now a template and stub category for the family. There are a couple of dozen articles in it now, but there will be many times that, when I've had time to finish populating it. Mostly, they're in the "A" section of the stub category for Olividae, where they are incorrectly listed. Uporządnicki (talk) 13:35, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Pegship, I read on another page that you are a Mac user and cannot use AWB. Have you come across WP:JWB? It works not only on Mac but even on iPad. Happy editing! – Fayenatic London 06:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, looks interesting. Thanks for the tip! Her Pegship (?) 02:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Pegship, a few years ago you raised the duplication of Category:Film incomplete lists and Category:Incomplete film lists at WT FILM, but nobody bit. Well, I've tracked it down and proposed a merge at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 July 14. Comments welcome! – Fayenatic London 21:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of phenomenologists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phenomenology. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gasko FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I hope you don't mind, but I've combined the five separate CfD entries into a single bundle named Australian transport stubs, to which I have added Category:Victoria (Australia) road stubs (which I presume you overlooked), and added the matching stub templates for all six. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I couldn't figure out how to combine/simplify them. Thanks for the cleanup. Her Pegship (?) 16:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nefret Emerson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nefret Emerson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]