User talk:Oli2000s

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Oli2000s! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Archer1234 (talk) 14:16, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paloma Baeza.webp

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Paloma Baeza.webp. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov / 12:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be related.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Oli2000s. I am Archer1234. Several of your recent edits to add the portal template to categories have some errors in them. Do not add the name of a portal that does not exist. For example, in this edit to Category:Expatriates in Uruguay you added this line:

{{Portal|Uruguay|Expatriates|Biography}}

But there is no portal called "Expatriates". As a consequence, the category is flagged as having an error and is placed into the tracking category: Category:Portal templates with redlinked portals. There are several categories currently in that category that are due to your recent edits. Please edit each of them to remove the non-existent portal names and take care to avoid adding them in the future. Thank you. — Archer1234 (talk) 14:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Stop adding non-existent portals to categories. Archer1234 (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, i understand i'm apologize for bad non existent portals on category here so I'm good editor please no blocked me i promise for not creating non existent portals Oli2000s (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Please fix the ones you added that still have non-existent portals specified in the {{Portal}} template. You can find the list here: Category:Portal templates with redlinked portals. — Archer1234 (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'm done fixing an non-existent templates Oli2000s (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatian Venezuelans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No flags

Hello. Regarding your edit Special:Diff/1132034840 in Japanese in the Philippines, note that Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons#Avoid flag icons in infoboxes instructs that flag icons should not be used in most cases. You have already been told so in last December in Special:Diff/1128759029, but you ignored and reverted it in Special:Diff/1131920701 without any justifiable edit summary. -- Wotheina (talk) 07:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oli2000s, can you please help by removing the flags that you've added to infoboxes, please? Cordless Larry (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, i'm sorry

You're clearly not sorry, as you continue to add flags to infoboxes. Please stop. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I finished Oli2000s (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I Promised for nevermind not adding an flags an infoboxes don't blocked me i'm good editor i finished Oli2000s (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oli2000s, Please remove the flag which you added. --Wotheina (talk) 04:59, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I finished, I'm removed the flags on infoboxes Oli2000s (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have not finished. Flags are not removed from Chinese people in Chile (Special:Diff/1127968156), Basque Chileans (Special:Diff/1127967156), and many more. --Wotheina (talk) 08:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright fixing Oli2000s (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tres Apenas Como Eso

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tres Apenas Como Eso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Schazjmd (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as bad article, please don't block me Oli2000s (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categorisation

Can you please make sure you fully understand WP:SUBCAT before undertaking any more categorisation of artices? I think you're breaking the rule that you shouldn't add an article to a parent category when it's a member of one of its subcategories. For example, here you added Croatian Venezuelans to Category:Venezuelan people by ethnic or national origin, but the article is already included in Category:Venezuelan people of Croatian descent, which is a subcategory of Category:Venezuelan people of European descent, which is a subcategory of the parent category you added it to, Category:Venezuelan people by ethnic or national origin. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're making the same mistake with edits such as this. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Alright i finished, i fixed Oli2000s (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Honduran people of Filipino descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Honduran people of Filipino descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Oli2000s (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turning 18

Hello everonye so i'm thinking was million times talking for i'm turning 18 and i'm adult so school and home was million asking and talking discussed.

Chile-Hungary relations moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Chile-Hungary relations. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no citations to reliable sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HouseBlastertalk 00:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, not problem Oli2000s (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chile-Hungary relations (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chile-Hungary relations and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Oli2000s! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japan–United Kingdom relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian people South American descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian people South American descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CarlJohnson-GTASA.png and File:CarlJohnson-GTASA-prerelease.jpg

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the pages you created, File:CarlJohnson-GTASA.png and File:CarlJohnson-GTASA-prerelease.jpg, were tagged as a page made in error under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, due to the page being mostly or fully comprised of a template loop or other techincal issues, and has been or soon may be deleted.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the pages and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aidan9382 (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Márka.png

Thanks for uploading File:Márka.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Oli2000s1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Oli2000s1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Failed attempts to create files

You have created several pages which had titles beginning "File:" but which were not in fact files. I don't know what you were trying to do, but please be careful, and try to avoid making similar mistakes again. JBW (talk) 22:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:CARLCJ.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CARLCJ.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category deletion nominations

I've nominated several categories you created for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 31 - you may wish to comment there. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The correct link to the discussion is Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 31. --Wotheina (talk) 05:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. Anyway, I've now nominated Category:Wikipedians interest in energy drink as well. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Bomba

Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Bomba, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Bomba and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Bomba during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JBW (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Oli2000s (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Márka

Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Márka, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Márka and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Oli2000s/User drinks Márka during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JBW (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete now! Oli2000s (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Celebrity Deathmatch has been nominated for deletion

Category:Wikipedians who like Celebrity Deathmatch has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JBW (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Oli2000s (talk) 12:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating unsuitable pages

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Playing around creating endless strings of pointless categories, pages in portal space which aren't portals, etc etc causes damage to the encyclopaedia by making editors spend time on cleaning up that lot instead of doing more constructive tasks. Please just stick to contributing to the encyclopaedia, and keep playing around for some other web site which is intended for that purpose, of which there are many. JBW (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand please don't block me i will never not creating unsuitable pages Oli2000s (talk) 12:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since you posted that response to my message, you have created 13 more categories. I have not checked every one of them to see what is in the categories, and determine whether they serve any useful purpose. However, a quick look at a few of them failed to find anything useful. For example, what is the point of a category called "Georgia–Ireland relations" which contains nothing except the category "Irish people of Georgian descent"? Firstly, relations between two countries does not mean people in the one country who have ancestry from the other, and secondly a category which contains nothing except one other category is to all intents and purposes a duplicate of that other category, and serves no useful purpose whatever. As you know, a number of categories which you have created have been deleted, and some others have been taken to deletion discussions. I have little doubt that more of them would undergo the same treatment if it weren't for that fact that wading through every one of the categories you have made to see whether any of them are worth keeping would take up excessive amounts of time for the editors concerned. As you know, there have been problems with other pages you have created too, but the rate at which you have been creating unhelpful categories is ridiculous. I very strongly advise you not to create any more categories until you have far more experience of editing Wikipedia, so that you have a good idea of what is suitable. In fact it will probably be best not to create any pages of any kind for quite a while: stick to making small improvements to articles until you have considerably more experience.
Please take this advice seriously. Messages asking you to change your ways have been ineffective, and seeing pages you created deleted has not deterred you. If you still don't change after being warned yet again, blocking you from particular types of editing will be the only recourse, or even blocking you from all editing. I really hope that won't be necessary, because you seem to be an enthusiastic editor, and I am sure you will be able to make many good contributions, and it will be a great pity if your potential is thrown away.
My last words of advice: Slow down. As I said above, for now stick to making small improvements to articles, and you will gradually gain enough experience to know how to do other things later. The first edit I made with my account was removing an apostrophe that shouldn't have been there. Of course I'm not suggesting that all of your edits should be as trivial as that, but I'm just using it to illustrate the fact that most people who go on in the long run to be successful editors start out by making small improvements to articles. Editors who jump straight into other areas sometimes manage OK, but many of them don't last long. JBW (talk) 22:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote the message above I assumed that the reason you were creating so many unhelpful categories was that you were a new editor who didn't know any better. I have now realised that you have in fact created hundreds of categories, and made thousands of edits to categories, over a much longer period than I realised. If I had known the full extent of your disruptive editing I would certainly not have spent my time writing and editing such a long message to you explaining to you things which by now you must already know. I would have either given you a one-sentence of a likely block, or perhaps just gone ahead with a block. Don't continue creating unsuitable pages, whether categories or not. Also some of the changes you have been making to existing categories look highly questionable. JBW (talk) 07:59, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've continued down this road, I've blocked you indefinitely. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No blocking me! I'm promise for don't for editing... Oli2000s (talk) 18:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please i'm sorry, I won't make this bad edit again please unblock, i promise for not bad editing Oli2000s (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
JJMC89 I'm sorry please don't block me i promise for I will never make bad categories and edits again! i writing Twitter Oli2000s (talk) 10:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good editing

Hey guys i'm sorry for creating an bad user templates was deleted and so i'm editing and working long time and so creating an categories and other more.

I'm promise never not creating an unsuitable pages and don't block me.

Wikimedia Incubator

On your user page, you claim to be a bureaucrat on Wikimedia Incubator. This appears to be false. The list of Incubator bureaucrats is at Incubator:Special:ListUsers/bureaucrat and your name doesn't feature. Unless you think I've made a mistake, I suggest that you correct your user page. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not overwrite existing articles

You made wrong edits Special:Diff/1124901383/1135847915 in Rodrigo Crespo. You completely erased the text about an Argentinian musician named "Rodrigo Crespo" (Special:Permalink/1124901383), and replaced it with text about a different person: a Hungarian actor "Crespo Rodrigo" (hu:Crespo Rodrigo), then merged both wikidata entries into a huge mess (wikidata:Special:Diff/1820378758). Also note that the text you added is unacceptable even if it is made into a new article, because it lacks any citation, and is full of incomprehensible or redundant sentences. Do not change sourced text without good reason, and do not add text without reliable source. --Wotheina (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand I'm sorry :( Oli2000s (talk) 00:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian people of Bolivian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian people of Bolivian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:North American people of Soviet descent

A tag has been placed on Category:North American people of Soviet descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #69994

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, asking an admin to unblock so i'm apologize for bad editing :( never don't editing so my profile editing Oli2000s (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oli2000s, I had wondered why you took so little notice of what editors said to you. However, from reading what you have written in your latest comment above, and even more from reading your comment at UTRS, it has become evident to me that you have a very low level of knowledge of English. That makes me wonder whether your failure to take note of what was said to you may have been because, at least partly, because you didn't understand. Also, perhaps some of what I thought were totally unreasonable categorisations of articles may have been due to misunderstandings of some of the words involved. Anyway, whether that was so or not, contributing to an English language encyclopaedia is, unfortunately, probably not going to work out well as long as your grasp of English is at its present level. Perhaps in the future you may learn more English, and then come back as an editor of English Wikipedia, but until that happens you would probably do better to edit in a language in which you have more competence. I see you have made a few edits to the Hungarian and Portuguese Wikipedias; is one of those your first language? JBW (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand i'm sorry Oli2000s (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm back here so remember when writen an Twitter and get's apologize for bad editing and bad categories I will never make bad categories and edits again! i know English language Oli2000s (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jamaica-Panama relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Jamaica-Panama relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chile-Nicaragua relations

A tag has been placed on Category:Chile-Nicaragua relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chile-Hungary relations

Information icon Hello, Oli2000s. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chile-Hungary relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chile-Hungary relations

Hello, Oli2000s. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chile-Hungary relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oli2000s. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oli2000s&oldid=1206267022"