User talk:Okeeffemarc

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
If I left you a message; please answer on the page where the message was left, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. If you leave me a message here, I will answer here on my talk page, notifying you in the same manner.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Daily pageviews of User:Okeeffemarc

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Okeeffemarc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon. I have waited around 3 years to request this unblock, well in excess of the recommended standard offer time. I stand by what I have said in previous unblock requests. I was very silly indeed for allowing someone I did not know access to my account. I enjoyed substantially editing articles such as Pat O'Keeffe and Lonsdale Belt and very much enjoyed creating the Arthur Frederick Bettinson article. If I am allowed my account back. I will continue to edit these articles and would like to significantly enhance the National Sporting Club article. The NSC is a significant part of British boxing history and deserves an article that reflects that. I will not and never have edited political articles. I have no interest in them. I have learnt my lesson and will never again expose my account details to anyone else. Thank you for your time. kind regards, Okeeffemarc (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per discussion below. And really, you have just told us this is a compromised account, and that you have lousy security practices, so why should we ever let you have an account again? — Daniel Case (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okeeffemarc (talk) 15:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]