User talk:OddBiologist

Hi OddBiologist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Haliclona submonilifera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Novem Linguae (talk) 09:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OddBiologist,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Phorbas (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 11:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: Ooft. Was in the process of making the page I linked too and missed the message. Took longer than it should have due to internet issues... I will contact the person who deleted it.

~~~~ OddBiologist (talk) 12:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OddBiologist, That's fine so, thanks for your contributions JW 1961 ^Talk 12:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: I see no deletion tag at Phorbas (disambiguation), just a dab template. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 16:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pbsouthwood, Hi, It was deleted and then restored on request to be fixed, I added the dab template when it was restored. JW 1961 ^Talk 16:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phorbas pustulosus, the baseball sponge, or Phorbas pustulosus (Carter, 1882), Baseball glove sponge? From the description, the latter seems more likely. Nice to see someone writing about sponges. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 16:07, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbsouthwood Yes, baseball glove sponge. Oops. No idea what happened there! Thanks for catching that. I have fixed it. And yeah, I'm just working through several field guides/species lists/etc to up the representation of particularly southern African species on here as they are seriously underrepresented. (and as are sponges! They're super cool but everyone overlooks them because of how "simple" they are)

~~~~ OddBiologist (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think a big part of the problem is the difficulty of identifying them in the field and from photos. People like to know what they are looking at, and "sponge" is not very informative. Appearance can be quite variable, and the field guides are very limited, and often out of date. I have hundreds of unidentified photos of sponges, mostly from the Cape Peninsula and False Bay. I have also done some work on coverage of marine species of southern Africa, as I tend to see them on dives. Ping me any time for comments or help. I am not great on technical Wiki stuff, but have been around long enough to know who and where to ask when it gets complicated. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbsouthwood Thanks so much for the offer! Yeah, sponges definitely are a little tricky but I also think its a bit of a viscous cycle. People aren't interested because there is no information and because there is no interest no information is made available. Have run into your observations many times on iNaturalist so I've got some idea about your massive amount of unidentified sponges! Looking into getting a cheap(ish) underwater camera so that I can actually contribute some underwater photos myself

~~~~ OddBiologist (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea of your budget, but I, and everyone else I have discussed the matter with and have used them, have found the Olympus TG series with underwater housing to be good value and adequately versatile. Also they fit into a pocket.

I also think the information problem is more a matter of not enough taxonomic effort. These days a website can get wider and cheaper visibility than paper publications, but it does not appear to be happening for sponges. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 03:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a tip on using speciesboxes. As you can see here you must either include the taxon field (full binomial) or genus field and taxon field together, but not both. If you don't, errors appear here. For example, see the fix I just did on Lobostemon belliformis. Cheers YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:25, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thanks for creating Template:Taxonomy/Rossella. At the moment it uses "link=Rossella", which links to a disambiguation page. I'm a novice with taxonomy templates, but I think that wants an update to "link=Rossella (sponge)"? Thanks again, 2A01:4C8:58:C7F5:D847:7BA5:279F:46FE (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks for catching that. Have changed it OddBiologist (talk) 16:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your entries on traditional medicine could mislead users to believe these uses are accurate and effective for treating diseases. Few uses of African plants are science-based. If a solid source says a plant is used for traditional medicine, then stating that is enough without detailing the quackery of supposed uses. Apply MEDRS first for any medical claims. This is not a reliable MEDRS source for any nutrition or medical claims. Zefr (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. Will do so in the future OddBiologist (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Isoetes stellenbossiensis is an excellent page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much :) OddBiologist (talk) 18:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OddBiologist. Thank you for your work on Senecio verbascifolius. User:Ppt91, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Might it be a good idea to create a link to it in the selected listing of species on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senecio?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ppt91 (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look and there's a separate list of Senecio species linked in the page. It's a large genus. But it could be added to the list of selected species too if you think that's valuable OddBiologist (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You did a good job with Hebenstretia kamiesbergensis! Congratulations BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]