User talk:Notthebestusername

Hi! Thanks for dropping into my (not the best user name - yes, that is really the name I have chosen!) home on wikipedia. Be my guest at the Teahouse! This is a friendly space where you can ask me questions about my contributions to Wikipedia. (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To fill my WikiLove quota. ;) Cheers! Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 15:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:Lixxx235 - Thank you :)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notthebestusername. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there any chance of you taking another look at Ardaseer Cursetjee? I see you did quite a lot of work on it a while ago, especially in the "Family" section, but it doesn't appear to make much sense. At one point we are saying he never married Marion and at another we're saying that the Parsi community did not accept the marriage, which is contradictory. More, we are using a blog, which is rarely a good idea. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 08:15, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Sitush, Sure. I will do so. I agree on your comment on the citation. I wonder - can you direct me to a few good references? I am also looking for the same, but would appreciate any help in this. Notthebestusername (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I found the article while doing some cleaning up and have zero knowledge of the subject, so I'm not much use to you as a provider of sources unless I start digging around for them myself. If you can't find appropriate sources then it may be best to remove all unsourced statements and those that are sourced to the blog: better to say nothing than to say the wrong thing, etc. - Sitush (talk) 07:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Sitush Thanks. I did some more digging and managed to find better citations. I have placed them instead and also improved the content of the wiki, removing any contradictions. The one blog that I have however left is actually authored by the University college of London and is used as part of the course curriculum there. I understand it undergoes a lot of cross checking from the peers in the university and so I have only kept this one. I will also check if I can get my hands on Ardaseer's book when I visit the British library next - perhaps they might have a surviving edition. Notthebestusername (talk) 02:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks very much for taking the time. I know that it can be a pain revisiting old writings. - Sitush (talk) 03:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mallika Badrinath, Notthebestusername!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for the nice article on Mallika Badrinath, and for your valued contribution to Wikipedia and open knowledge.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your improvements to the article, and your other work on other articles, but you are introducing quite a few errors. For example, you have written "The paracel are a group of island and atolls in the South western part of South China sea." Well no, they're not. Not even close. "The Paracels are a group of islands and atolls in the north western part of South China Sea." It is the Spratlys which are in the south of the South China Sea (SCS), not the Paracels. I'll give it a few days before I start correcting your errors. Maybe in the meantime you will have corrected them? Best wishes, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: 3,000 metres (or is it 2,700 metres - I can't put my finger on the exact number) is NOT a "small" airport - it's at least twice the length of any other non-PRC airport in the SCS. Pdfpdf (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I have corrected the error regarding Paracel. Regarding the airport, the landing strip in woody island is small as per the classification of ICAO and FAA. I have added this qualifier in the wiki. The qualifier that you mention really does not make much sense - a small airport in the Antartica remains a small airport, even if it is the largest in Antartica. The airstrip on woody island is barely sufficient to land a small aircraft (the PRC managed one landing which was more of a "pride landing"). This landing strip is quiet similar to the ones on Lakshadweep (a small airport). Notthebestusername (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your Antartica analogy: Fair comment. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "small": References saying that the airport can handle Boeing-737-sized aircraft and the PRC's fighter jets gave me the impression that it wasn't "small". Your comments now make me realise that I need to know more about the relative sizes of airports. I do reflect, however, that given that it's twice the length of any other non-PRC airport in the SCS, what are the other non-PRC airports? Tiny? No big deal. Keep up the good work. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - your comment led me to read up more which was the real fun part. I am also wondering if I should just change it to military air strip (one flight to it in 3 years really does not make it an airport...) - Thanks for pointing this out. Notthebestusername (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I find the topic of the PRC allowing "tourists" to visit the Paracels interesting - while it seems they're prepared to run cruise ships to the Crescent Group, they don't seem to want to run civilian flights (or cruise ships) to the Amphitrite Group. Like you, it seems to me that "military air strip" seems more appropriate, and I like your changes to Woody Island Airport. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 08:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pdfpdf Thanks. Notthebestusername (talk) 06:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notthebestusername. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits at the Vishwas article because you're relying far too much on what he says about himself, which is not a good idea when he is a self-publicist. I'm also unsure about some of your changes, eg: you said that the recording that went viral was doctored, in which case why did he apologise when he'd done nothing wrong? The article has been subject to a massive amount of fancruft over the years and I'm afraid I don't think your changes were much better. We need reliable independent sources. - Sitush (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notthebestusername. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:31, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tariq Bashir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Bashir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 07:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reedbank.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Guazi.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant presence with reliable sources and the 4 out 5 reference not working to see its importance. Creator of this page may remove this notice but its subject to improve article with reliable working sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Qinling Huaihe Line.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]