User talk:Nightmareishere

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Retroactiv, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retroactiv. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? LegoTech·(t)·(c) 09:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! If you have concerns about rampant sockpuppetry, please open a case at WP:SSP. WP:AIV is for acute, blatant vandalism only. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In a few seconds, I will place a note to Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts concerning the following edits by User:Anlinguist:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anal%E2%80%93oral_sex&diff=prev&oldid=249567684 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anal%E2%80%93oral_sex&diff=prev&oldid=249487227 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anal%E2%80%93oral_sex&diff=prev&oldid=249482193 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anal%E2%80%93oral_sex&diff=next&oldid=249479171 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anal%E2%80%93oral_sex&diff=prev&oldid=249673828

It is my belief that these edits are disruptive and a breach of Wikiquette. superluser_tc 2008 November 07, 06:00 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from John Spiker. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  -- WikHead (talk) 02:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Twins (group), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.the-twins.de/pages/story_e.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Twins (group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OMD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Probably not much use in blocking the IP, but at least nobody is likely to be fooled by an IP impersonation.--Kubigula (talk) 16:41, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) Nightmareishere (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nightmareishere, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 15:06, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, if you didn't nominate an obviously notable band for deletion, we wouldn't have any problems like this.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Milowent... :-) Nightmareishere (talk) 02:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Any way we could get a "public domain" photograph of the band - can't be a Relativity promo shot, that's under their copyright, but pics someone took at a concert and taker is willing to release commercial rights, I can help get it uploaded and on the article. Email me at milo_went at yahoo dot com if you want help. Cheers.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:55, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks, Milowent! I will contact the band's guitarist to see what we can find!Nightmareishere (talk) 02:45, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nightmareishere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nightmareishere. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nightmareishere (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked under the premise of 'logged out disruption'. I have done nothing of the sort. My IP address is a shared address, used regularly by at least three other people. The laptop I use is also a shared computer. I understand the need to block my IP address for vandalism, but blocking me personally is not fair. When I make edits on Wikipedia they are constructive and in good faith. Nightmareishere (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; user has appealed a checkuser block to ArbCom. KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 00:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|SECOND REQUEST, SINCE THE FIRST ONE WAS IGNORED. I was blocked under the premise of 'logged out disruption'. I have done nothing of the sort. My IP address is a shared address, used regularly by at least three other people. The laptop I use is also a shared computer. I understand the need to block my IP address for vandalism, but blocking me personally is not fair. When I make edits on Wikipedia they are constructive and in good faith. Nightmareishere (talk) 00:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have deactivated your second unblock request, you only need one. please be patient. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]