User talk:Newroderick895

Hello, Newslayer3015, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Roblox seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:27, 6 January 2018 (

Hello, I am currently in the process of a big review for the article "French fries" and I would appreciate it if you could not corrupt the page with another image as the first one was perfectly fine. Thank you AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry for corrupting the article with another image, Im have no idea what would happen. I will try my best to Edit the article back to its original picture. Thanks :) User:Newslayer3015 (talk) 🙂

See you later

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Old East Slavic, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Josh Axe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.healthfoodemporium.com/dr-axe/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be lockfrom editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:49, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Help me, how do i make sources that is not copyright i think every reference i make is copyrighted. Help1! newroderick895 (talk) 13:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)newroderick895  helped in #wikipedia-en-help ^connect ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is 1.02 editor. I noticed that you left me a message on my talk page requesting to ba adopted. Looking at your history, I see that you have already gotten extended confirmed rights, installed Twinkle, and is quite proficient in wikitext. If you only need a one time help, please consider the Teahouse. If you really want adoption, please leave me a message and we can begin. Thanks 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 11:47, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 1.02 editor, and thank you for responding me. Aside from my advantages, However, i have some disadvantages — i dont know how to make my own articles better. and so on. Sure, i want to begin. newroderick895 (talk) 12:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you@1.02 editor:? Are you responding? newroderick895 (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delayed response, please note that I am in GMT+8 and it is quite late here. Time aside, yes we can begin. I'll create a page where all the stuff related to the adoption would go after this. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 13:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does it also include helping to create an article? if so, i can create one. newroderick895 (talk) 13:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also where is the page? newroderick895 (talk) 13:43, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: I see serious problems with an article about Josh Axe and have therefore asked for its deletion. You are very welcome to argue against me there, or to improve the article, or (the course most likely to be persuasive) both to argue against me and to improve the article. -- Hoary (talk) 13:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Axe, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. MT Train^Talk 14:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Josh Axe has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be lockfrom editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• When interacting with other editors, please do so in a respectful manner. Specifically, if you make a habit of remarks like this edit summary you may find yourself blocked. 89.240.143.247 (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ah, i didnt see that, i just got a little frustrated and i went too extreme, sorry newroderick895 (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Admitting and apologising for one's mistakes is a very mature move, thank you. 89.240.143.247 (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • thank you too and bye i can see you next day, or whatever! :-) newroderick895 (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. newroderick895 (talk) 19:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just a heads up that the contrast of your username in your signature is far below the minimum recommended at WP:SIGAPP, which is part of signature policy. I had trouble reading your username, and my vision is fairly good. Thanks. ―Mandruss ☎ 13:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i know my signature is basic & simple, i hereby apologize if my signature gives you trouble reading it. Newroderick895 13:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I am a real big fan of neon colours and neon green (seriously/honestly), your current signature unfortunately has the same issues. Could I recommend choosing a darker tone of green? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what your intent with these edits was, but removing comments, especially because you didn't like the outcome, is inappropriate. Resubmitting the request as if it would go unnoticed is likewise inappropriate. Your intentions seem to be genuinely good and you've proven the ability to be helpful, so there's no need for this sort of thing. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:54, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Know @Amorymeltzer: because i thought that once i got denied for such reason, i would be denied too in the future i ever try qualify to be pending changes reviewer, When can i send again and how long can i wait for next one, but once for all it is evening and i have little reason to respond. Newroderick895 16:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This can be annoying but i would recommend you to see my contributions. Compare that to edits i made to Josh Axe and edits i did today, Differences? Newroderick895 17:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no time line or limit on how long you have to wait, it's a judgment thing. I recommend putting it out of your mind — the majority of articles aren't under pending changes protection, so becoming a reviewer is minimal. It carries no weight or authority or respect, so I would recommend putting it out of your mind and moving on to better, more productive things. I did review your contributions, I always do as part of a permissions request. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and see you later. Newroderick895 17:18, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have deleted this article, but I wasn't sure why you nominated it for both WP:CSD and WP:AFD, as I think one nomination is enough. Cheers, Alex Shih (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah because that was created by my old account, (you can see more in my userpage) At that time i had absolutely NO EXPERIENCE AT ALL. It is now unnecessary. Newroderick895 18:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, if you think that your userboxes are too long (too many), you could either trim them down, reorganize the layout, or look at what other users have done to hide/organize them. I put mine inside of collapsible boxes for instance. Just a thought. You can never have too many userboxes! (also why I created Template:User Too many messages last April) --All the best, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 01:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kronans Apotek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats @Newroderick895! I suggest finding an interesting hook and submit it to DYK. Do note that this has to be done within 7 days of the creation of the article (10 April). 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 11:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new lesson and assignment on the adoption page, do check it out and complete the assignment! 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 07:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goldador, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Kronans Apotek at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mineral industry of Europe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–Ammarpad (talk) 02:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to inform you that I would be semi-retiring with immediate effect. Do feel free to ping me if you still need any help as I will still login regularly to supervise the expansion of a current article. Thanks. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 14:45, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Kronans Apotek at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed your point about WP:LABELS on Talk:Mehmet Oz. I've also added some points in Talk myself, namely regarding WP:PROPORTION and undue weight. Also interesting, the lede includes a paragraph on criticism but leaves out any mention of the subject's Emmy awards and nominations, which seems to be a clear cut issue of POV in the article. The section on the awards itself is missing nominations albeit including wins. There seems to be an effort to minimize the balance of the article in favor of one particular direction, bringing about some serious NPOV and Proportion issues. DA1 (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mineral industry of Europe at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Kronans Apotek at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mineral industry of Europe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mining in Sweden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sam Sailor 22:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your DYK nomination of Kronans Apotek has now been marked for closure. If you wish for the nomination to proceed before it is closed, please edit the nomination or the article as soon as possible. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scandinavian red fox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newroderick895. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]