User talk:HipHopStan

Hello, MoneyIsEverything! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ThemFromSpace 22:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

The article H*Wood has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shirt58 (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Libra Scale, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libra Scale. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Adabow (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Teflon Don (album), a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. STAT -Verse 02:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HipHopStan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not a specific sockpuppet. Just a similar name I've requested to change at WP:Changing username/Simple. Administrator blocked my account for one week without me adding a notice to user Andrewlp1991 because of date of birth. I've added his official birth year instead of of an unknown birthday priorly after the Biographies of a Living Person Noticeboard was created. The administrator mistaken my edit as disruptive however older revisions had this birthday also before I joined Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

No, not blocked because of a "similar name" - this was a technically-verified instance of WP:SOCK. The rule is: 1 person, 1 username. If you get blocked, then correct your behaviour and ask for unblock. Once you have created more than 1 account, unblock is less likely (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HipHopStan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know a sockpuppet is less likely to be unblocked but my username is just a coincidence with genre fan usage. I've never made a personal attack upon someone or disruptived a article without permission or reasoning on the Flo Rida article like the other user who made this incident long ago.

Decline reason:

The truth would have been far more helpful here. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: The above unblock request review was undone with the comment "I want another administrator to review this request. Not one of who whom supported it..". Jpgordon didn't partake in the SPI case, as far as I can tell. Nonetheless, I've reviewed the unblock request again below. Amalthea 22:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HipHopStan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know a sockpuppet is less likely to be unblocked but my username is just a coincidence with genre fan usage. I've never made a personal attack upon someone or disruptived a article without permission or reasoning on the Flo Rida article like the other user who made this incident long ago.

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for using multiple accounts abusively. That was verified during a checkuser investigation, and I have just confirmed it. You keep denying it, which is not a good sign.
I would advise you to look at the WP:Standard offer, to not edit Wikipedia for six months, and to try another unblock request with a rationale addressing the reason for your block then. Amalthea 22:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HipHopStan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry for blaming the wrong administrator but what really bothers me is when I see my contributions. Icestorm815 put their specific reason as "Disruptive editing: WP:BLP disruption, at page, Flo Rida" for my block. I did not disrupt the page. All I added was a single year date. Another administrator, Cirt, for some reason accused me for the case and chosed a user with a same name and same contributions as my account as to being a sockpuppet. I'm here to contribute to Hip-Hop related articles and categories not vandalize or disrupt them. I am (or was) looking forward to making Wikipedia a safer and organized place incase someone gives the wrong information.

Decline reason:

Two different checkusers have confirmed that you are indeed a sockpuppet of another account. This puts the question beyond disputation. You will need to request unblocking from your main account, not this one. TNXMan 11:55, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: I do not have the same contributions as HipHopFan4Life neither do I have the same IP address. The sock puppet template is questionable. See WP:NOASSUMESOCK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HipHopStan (talk • contribs) 07:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you deny that you have edited as, say, User:Rihanna Knowles? Amalthea 16:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Libra Scale, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libra Scale (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about money, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on H*Wood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]