User talk:Moarrikh

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Tanoli, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Enric Naval (talk) 23:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I see you are a member of Pashtun projects. If you know about the subject, you should also know that the maps you keep re-instating is completely wrong. As i stated earlier in multiple talk pages, the map is showing majority pashto speaking areas such as Karak District, Shangla District, Battaggram District, Toorghar District and Buner District as Hindko Speaking, while Tank District is being shown as Saraiki Speaking. The map is of a very bad quality and extemely in accurate, so one wonders why was it allowed to be used in the first place. Also if you are a member of Pashtun project you should yourself be aware that the map being used is inaccurate amd should be removed or replaced. File:Map of Languages of Kyber Pakhtunkha Province.jpg Tigerkhan007 (talk) 21:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you seemed rather confused about why your edits in the salwar kameez article were deleted. Reliable sources are needed to verify info, especially highly contested information. Unsourced or improperly sourced content can be challenged and removed. Basically, you just need to find reliable sources to back up your edits. See WP:V and WP:CITE for more information. Thanks. Copana2002 (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Khan (name). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

If you need help in formatting your citations, please ask for it here or on the article talk page.

Please do not remove existing citations from WP:reliable sources unless you can give a good reason, e.g. that the old citation has been accepted as incorrect as a result of later research. Even then, it may make the encyclopedia more informative to keep the old citation and explain in the article that it has been superseded by a new one. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to personally attack editors you simply disagree with you will be BLOCKED from editing. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:09, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 31 hours per WP:NPA for this edit. You can appeal your block, but please read this page first. Regards. --RegentsPark (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Jemima Khan, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed some of the material you put on the talk page - I would not normally edit such a contribution but in this case the material was inappropriate. Springnuts (talk) 10:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Shah (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Moarrikh, I have maded some changes on the Oghi article and corrected some basic fallacies and factual errors, would be glad if you coudl aslo please add your views and comments. In view of evident tampering and /or vandalism on the same page/article, I have also made a report to Wikipedia. Thanks and best wishes 39.54.32.206 (talk) 06:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Prof Asad U Khwaja[reply]

Dear Moarrikh I have seen you doing edits on subject page time and again. I am not against edits but logic and truth must prevail. Moreover, there should be no 'Vandalism', 'Partiality' and 'Racism'. Unfortunately, I somehow find these elements in your edits on subject page, time and again. Your talk page under other sections is a proof to that. Please stop doing so. If you are convinced by some impulse, it would be nice if you discuss it first on my talk page. If you do not stop, I will be forced to complain against you to Wikipedia for permanently blocking your identity. And please don't be offended. Regards Dilazak1 14:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I have referred the matter for 'Arbitration' at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_.7BDilazak1.7D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilazak1 (talk • contribs) 13:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dilazak1 21:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

When discussing improving articles on Wikipedia please remember to comment on the content, not the contributor. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 20:47, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a courtesy notice that a request for arbitration, which named you as a party, has been declined. Please feel free to see this page for suggestions on moving forward.

For the Arbitration Committee, -- Lord Roem (talk) 20:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanoli, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Dear Sir/Madam,

I respectfully request your assistance in reviewing my draft article, Draft:Mughal Khel. As a sub-tribe of the Yousafzai, the Mughal Khels are unique in that they are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in Southern Pakhtunkhwa, where they speak a soft version of Pashto. They are based in Bannu and their history and cultural practices have been documented in various online sources and books.

It is my hope that by writing this article, I can contribute to the knowledge base about the Yousafzai tribe and highlight their rich tradition of migration and cultural diversity. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and support in ensuring that the information is accurate and suitable for submission on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, 17:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Isparki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isparki (talk • contribs)