User talk:MikeAllen

	Happy New Year!
	Hello MikeAllen: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. 2pou (talk) 19:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

2pou (talk) 19:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mike. Just a reminder that I left you a reply in the talk page of this movie and I am awaiting your answer. Hispalois (talk) 19:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike - posted can now be uploaded if you wanted as today is the release date. Thanks Ctwjames (talk) 13:09, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The release date for the poster? Where would I obtain it? Thanks. Mike Allen 13:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike, so someone on the article for the FNAF movie put that "a sequel is in development" and put a reference to an IGN article (link here: https://www.ign.com/articles/josh-hutcherson-dying-to-get-back-on-set-for-five-nights-at-freddys-2), where Josh Hutcherson, who played the film's main character, stated that "I know they’re in the process right now of nailing down the story". Should this be taken as facts or just gossip?

Thanks, SupraMerioBros. (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your version of the Romulus edit for the Premise looked good, however, another editor is reverting it. Could you glance at it. HenryRoan (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not to press any buttons here but their is no way mother could possibly be anywhere near those 2 genres, just because one source said it was too it is either a surrealist horror or a psychological horror mate Pomniismywife (talk) 02:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CITE Mike Allen 02:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this film being a horror was common sense? Pomniismywife (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Hello, as you might know, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I don't know how to use inland citations and how to fix my "references" line. If you could help out, it would be greatly appreciated. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome! Help:Referencing for beginners is a step-by-step guide (with images) on how to properly cite sources. Mike Allen 19:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have put something on Talk page there. Thanks. John315 (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have replied. John315 (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you are going to report me over the fact that I'm telling the truth that Scooby Doo 1 was released in Hollywood on June 8 and 2002? I'm literally telling the truth, I understand I need a citation, however I'm still new to Wikipedia as I mainly do edits on Nascar because I'm a NASCAR fan, and a fan other sports, and love movies and tv shows. I would like a apology and Appreciate a response back, I hope you understand that I'm still new as I'm been on here for a few months. Take care. MadBlade 2 (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CITE. You must include a reliable source, as you have been told many times. "Look it up on Google" is not a source. Mike Allen 16:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I Read it When I can. But I want to ask. Why didn't they add the Hollywood release date When the Wikipedia was first made? Probably because they either a forgot about it or b didn't care enough for it. I believe Hollywood release dates are important, I mean come on, Scooby Doo 2 Monsters unleashed can have it's Hollywood release date but not Scooby Doo 1? Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I know you might disagree but I believe it is important for a Wikipedia to have a Hollywood release date. I apologize for what I did, but I believe it's about dang time Scooby Doo 1 has it's Hollywood release date ever since it's Wikipedia was created over 2 decades ago. MadBlade 2 (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean how many movies have you seen on Wikipedia where they didn't have there Hollywood release dates? MadBlade 2 (talk) 16:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find a reference of literally anyone online in an interview or reporting on the film mentioning the release date, literally anyone who is not a blog, and then include it on the page as a reference. 77.92.145.214 (talk) 02:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would it be possible to leave the Monkey Man film plot as is? I cite a reputable source (Bloody-Disgusting.com) and have adjusted the plotline so that it's in my words. Thank you in advance. Melj419 (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

• Red-tailed hawk
• Robertsky

• Ameliorate!
• Ancheta Wis
• Anthony Bradbury (deceased)
• Cobi
• Ev
• Moondyne
• Worm That Turned

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

• Enterprisey
• Izno

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

1) per MOS, citations are not required in the lede. 2) citation is in two other places in the article, for example, <ref name="GQ1"> (Blainster) Blainster (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the sequel is not yet released, and it is discussed in a later section, on reflection I am OK with leaving it out of the lede. Blainster (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it was in production (not just "in development") I would not have an issue with it in the lead. We are not sure if that will the final title for a purported sequel. Mike Allen 00:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be in production, since the mid-credits scene indicates the prequel will star Louis Partridge, and Matthew Vaughn has been shooting a film with Partridge for the past two months under the working title Project X, he just did not say before now what the film was. 77.92.145.214 (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I put a message describing the discrepancy in reported production dates on the Talk page of the film How to Have Sex. Blainster (talk) 16:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Renner (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Do you think you could add the posters to the Under Wraps 2 and Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion pages? Both are in need of photos at the moment.

Thank you. Cqntralls (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 In progress Mike Allen 13:39, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done Hello! It looks like Ultra Violet & Black Scorpion already has a title card in place (which I believe is prefered in the TV community project for series). However, I did upload a Under Wraps 2 poster. Mike Allen 13:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you rated Start on Talk:Accidental Texan. That being said, would you agree that the rating is Start on Chocolate Lizards? After all, Accidental Texan is a duplicate article of Chocolate Lizards. The Film Creator (talk) 15:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait there was two articles under different names? Which one did I edit? I don't see any of my edits in the history. Mike Allen 21:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, is it okay for me to nominate this page for deletion? Ddg1208gaming (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "based on" for Beetlejuice Beetlejuice: those are the writers of the original movie. Trivialist (talk) 23:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source that Beetlejuice Beetlejuice has a based on credit? Mike Allen 23:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you did this, you reverted everything I did, including the external links. Why? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s explained in the edit summary and the talk page. However about the links, BOM is already used as a reference. What more information does Allmovie add? Mike Allen 19:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything in your edit summary or talk page as to why you removed the external links I added. There are 22 citations: which citation is BOM? AllMovie adds the same kind of content that IMDb has. Why would you include the latter and not the former? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because IMDb offers more? And to not create a link farm. Mike Allen 20:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only meant to undo your release date changes. I didn't even noticed you had added the links. Just add them back, it's really not that big of a deal... Mike Allen 20:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which citation is BOM? I also explained why on the talk page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:30, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just add it back! Mike Allen 20:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which citation is BOM? I also explained why I cannot add it back on the talk page. Wow. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Mike. The recent discussion about about production company/distributor. Also another discussion about suggestion of change "Label" to "Distributor" or something at album release history table. 2001:D08:2921:1C93:17B7:125D:695C:8E5E (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve notice someone created a page for the upcoming A24 Backrooms movie on here. But I noticed there’s a draft page for the film. Is the Backrooms movie filming right now since there’s a page for it I see no evidence that it’s filming. I think the live page should be deleted since the page literally assumes things instead of facts. I posted the article link for you.

The Backrooms (upcoming film)

My second question is will you put Oz Perkins' The Monkey article live since it’s been filming since the beginning of the month? Thanks and sorry for making you read all that lol.

Draft:The Monkey (film) 2600:8801:100B:9F00:8483:7C66:A341:9C3B (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I posted on the talk page of The Backrooms.

I don't think the The Monkey is ready since it only has two sources and no release date set. Maybe more information will come out in the next few weeks. Mike Allen 23:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Administrator changes Sdkb The Night Watch East718 Isabelle Belato Mzajac Staecker Stan Shebs Sugarfish Tamzin

Bureaucrat changes SilkTork

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
• Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

• The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

• The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

Hi there, there's a user by the name of Mxhyn16 who is edit warring on that page reverting it to his personal preference. I don't know if you have it on your watchlist but stuff is going on there. I swear I'm not making unconstructive edits as he falsely claims I am, I'm just correctly crediting prod companies on the page. The user took it personally and said hateful things in his edit summaries like: "STOP ADDING WARNER BROS BACK?!? ARE YOU REALLY THAT F#CKING STUPID OR JUST ABSOLUTELY RETARDED?!?" or "stop acting like a total b#tch." along with other messed up things. I'm fed up with his bs antics and I'd just like for you to stop him, give him a warning or block that guy since he says toxic things to others. 101.115.184.223 (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've seen the end credits of that show but here's proof if you haven't seen its end credits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FwyJzppqfU 101.115.184.223 (talk) 07:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, look I know you have no reason to talk to me but I will explain how this all started and why I acted the way I did. If you go to edit history of the Monarch page, you will see a revision of user2601:18e:c080:2b70:8cd0:9fb1:f58d:67aa or 2601:18e:c080:2b70:4439:b86a:ed5b:8ec3 on January 7, 2024 at 19:05 and January 6, 2024 at 17:37. His edits was very similar to yours with that user adding the "Warner Bros Pictures (in association)" as part of its production companies and I reverted this user's edits because his edits was unconstructive and there wasn't a reliable source. And when I first saw your edits, I immediately assumed that you were that user because you added the "Warner Bros Pictures" as part of its production companies very similar to his edits. That's when I immediately lost my sh#t because I thought you were doing this third time and I completely lost it. That is how this whole thing started and that's why we're having this feud in the first place. What I did to you was absolutely unforgivable and absolutely inexcusable. I shouldn't have lost my temper. I shouldn't have called you a "retard" or a "dumb bitch." I should have done something different like asking you a simple question like, "I want to ask you a quick question. Are you the same user as 2601:18e:c080:2b70:8cd0:9fb1:f58d:67aa or 2601:18e:c080:2b70:4439:b86a:ed5b:8ec3 because your edits was very similar was theirs?" I am truly sorry for the way I treated you and the way I made your life a living hell. My actions have caused a lot of pain to you and I'm deeply regretful for that. If you do not want to forgive me, I totally understand that. I'm not looking for forgiveness. I hope that we end this feud once and for all and just live peacefully instead of fighting one another. I know that my apology isn't going to be enough to make up the things I did. Which is why I want you to tell the administrators to have me blocked from editing for a month so I can atone for my actions. Wikipedia is poisoning my mind and it's turning me into a shitty person. That's not who I want to be. I need to touch grass and focus on activities that are much healthier than Wikipedia. I can exercise or listen to music. Or I can go to therapy because my mental health is not in a good state. Either way, I'm willing to be best version of myself by these mentioned factors and treat others well the way they treat me. I hope you understand. Mxhyn16 (talk) 19:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable and fair enough. I'm sorry too for what I've done. I kinda get all pissy and mad when someone insults me. I basically do try to control my outburts but sometimes I can't. It's pretty much the reason I got blocked temporarily for feuding with another user and outside of Wikipedia, I'm feuding with some other guy who let's just say is spreading huge misinfo on a streaming service saying "it's not streaming." etc. I've feuded with that guy for nearly 3 years and nowadays I ignore him most of the time, I just want peace in my life and focus on other things. Yes, the internet is a curse and there are things that I can't resist clicking on. I can admit that I'm stupid for retaliating at you like that. I tend to have problems with understanding editors that are not admin people. I can agree with most of the stuff you said. I'm going through a tough time so yeah. One thing I can agree on is that some I.P editors are downright stupid and treat this site like a fandom fanfic wiki or they're just crazy logo kids. Although some of their edits are quite comical, I'm not one of those guys. My friends on the other hand were. I'd pretty much describe myself as a good faith user anyways. Per talk page, I've decided to not include Warner Bros in the info box since they distributed it and the distributor bit is gone, so I've mentioned it in the article itself instead. If it gets removed, it's removed. All I want to do is just correct infobox in shows where possible if I can. You probably should have asked me about those edits so we could have come to an understanding. I was going to ask the admin people to block you during the feud via the Edit Warring noticeboard but I've decided to not go through it as 1. At the time I did not do anything in the talk page and I just reverted leading to chance of it backfiring and both of us being blocked. And 2. I've calmed down and I have decided I don't wanna make more enemies and start another long intense feud. Long story short, I'm burying the hatchet and I'm moving on. I don't wish to give you any more problems. You might need a break but you don't need a block to do it. However you can actually request them to block you or put some template that shows you're on break or something. Hopefully we can move on from this issue and get on with doing more important things in life, especially with stuff I have been putting off for quite a while. 101.115.182.233 (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Footloose (2011 film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

It's been a while since we've talked, got busy with college and so-so. When I returned to see Megamind vs. the Doom Syndicate, I wanted to fix it a bit, right? And then these vandals came in, and while they've expressed similar disdain to the sequel, they're really going in for it. A handful of editors (including myself) have had to reverse their vandalism multiple times (sometimes in the same day!)

If it's possible, could we request temporary semi-protection for the article? Maybe for a week or two, this should keep them away from editing. Or even better – try to get 'edit validation' or whatever it's called, I forgot what it was called (whoops!). Thanks!

Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 06:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it has been protected for 10 days. I have found that animated films tend to draw the worse type of edits. I have started to take many off of my watchlist because it can get stressful. Mike Allen 00:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. Wow, looks like you've been pretty inactive lately – explains the late response post-protection. Can't blame you, though. Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 12:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Movers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

So I’ve seen two edits here that sort of either vandalise or give unhelpful information: on The Palace (2023 film), https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Palace_(2023_film)&diff=prev&oldid=1213542014 and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Palace_(2023_film)&diff=prev&oldid=1213539659.

I don’t want this to seem like an edit war, so could we work together to revert that particular user’s edits? Thanks!

Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 23:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC) Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 23:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! That editor I mentioned earlier got blocked. Boy, that escalated quickly... Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 03:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to recommend page protection since it looked like they were using multiple IPs. But this works too! :) Mike Allen 13:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for leaving the red link in there. Since you're interested in editing TV and film topics, I'll invite you to take a look at this category of images we just captured at the South by Southwest 2024 film and TV festival. There are a lot of actors and filmmaker photos we captured that could use placement in articles, so any help by experienced editors like yourself is welcome! commons:Category:South_by_Southwest_2024. A more detailed description of the project is here: commons:Commons:WikiPortraits. Examples of articles improved already include: Cazzie David, Morgan Spector, Jaboukie Young-White. Cheers. - Fuzheado | Talk 13:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will look into this. Mike Allen 13:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I wonder if you could help me - you reverted my uncited reference. It's on Youtube as Mark Kermode reviews Late Night with the Devil - Kermode and Mayo's Take www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRwSsNgZW2g where you can see the Good Doctor Kermode say it. I think it might also be on a podcast they have on ?Spotify. Am I right in understanding Youtube references aren't allowed? Surely this should be allowed as a reference as it's clearly his words, his opinion, just not in a written form. I thought the Ghostwatch reference was needed as people having been saying it's so unique and so unusual, whereas it seems very similar to Ghostwatch, and Kermode thinks that too .... Stronach (talk) 11:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have cited the YouTube link as a source for the review and it is back in the page. Thanks for letting me know. Mike Allen 13:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you reverted my edit just now? I'm genuinely confused because the wiki for the movie doesn't describe it as upcoming and displays a release date. Am I reading it wrong? Has the movie not been released in theaters? 166.194.204.79 (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dead Guy (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed at Knives Out that you rolled back some edits by the IP editor 2A01:E0A:C06:70E0:C508:9FA0:7FE5:323D, with the flag that they were "non-constructive". I reverted the rollback because I didn't see anything wrong with their edit, and on a closer look I don't understand what's non-constructive about any of the edits you rolled back. At Fight Club (2023), for example, I looked for some sources and they're entirely correct that the story is attributed to Sasi. Am I missing something? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Going around and changing information without an explanation [an edit summary] is not constructive. Mike Allen 08:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Hello, MikeAllen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Movers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Prima Donna (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for removing the incorrect categories that are not reliable sources that I put. I thought she was a comedian at this point because she played comedic roles and her funny moments in her talk show and her guesting in interviews. I appreciate that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, glad it was helpful. If your interest is to categorize pages, this page may be beneficial: Wikipedia:Categorization dos and don'ts. Also there is more scrutiny on biographies of living people pages. Mike Allen 20:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you upload a film poster without uploading it on Wikimedia Commons? Ddg1208gaming (talk) 23:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Click this link:[1] Mike Allen 23:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scared to Death (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeAllen Hello. I have noticed your edits on The Garfield Movie in which information was removed for not being sourced or for being untrue. Specifically, Wayfarer Studios and One Coll Group Limited were removed under the guise of not being credited in the trailer or poster of the movie, and Liz Wilson (Jon's love interest in the Garfield franchise) being removed under not being sourced. I refute this. 1.) Wayfarer's and One Cool's logo are shown on the website for the movie and posters. They were even at the end of the second trailer. 2.) Liz appears in the second trailer (specifically the vet scene), and currently has no voice actor confirmed to play her. Additionally, addressing the accusation of removing needed sources, what I did was move certain sources to more fitting places in the article (like moving the source of Harvey Guillen voicing Odie to the newly-created casting section) and removed redundant ones (like the one for Snoop Dogg collabbing with Keith Urban for the movie that was in the cast section).

I'm not making any of this up. I'm not trying to start a war with what I'm doing. I encourage you to stop persistently removing factual information under the guise of not being sourced or untrue, as you previously did with Poor Things (film). That is essentially starting an edit war. ZX2006XZ (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that would be good to refer those websites as such. For your prose limiting, thank you for that. Did some digging, those are Pakistani, Indian websites, and what they reported did indeed catch the eye of the director, enough so for The Hollywood Reporter to headline an article about it, which opened with a sizable piece about the injury, not to mention other coverage by other sites when that subsequently "blew up". Thanks for cutting that down to the proper size and helping emphasize the right aspects of what was trying to be said there.

Have a good one! ReddlSKye (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Pictures and Focus Features will distribute the film Maxxine with A24 at International. It won't be first time that Universal Pictures got involved in X trilogy; they also distributed X's prequel, Pearl. I am telling the truth. Can we added those information?

https://www.universalpictures.co.uk/micro/maxxxine https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FzLMfrvyOPk&pp=ygUlTWF4eGluZSB1bml2ZXJzYWwgcGljdHVyZXMgdWsgdHJhaWxlcg%3D%3D 2A02:C7C:5ADE:9E00:7C4A:2B87:EEF6:5826 (talk) 23:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok? It still doesn't go in the infobox. We need third party reliable sources to include in the Release section. Mike Allen 23:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what about this Instagram link? Will it still back up my sources for Maxxxine? https://www.instagram.com/universalpicsau/p/C5pvSpPN2AR/ 2A02:C7C:5ADE:9E00:7C4A:2B87:EEF6:5826 (talk) 23:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This site could for the UK release: https://filmdistributorsassociation.com/release-schedule/all-future-releases/ Mike Allen 23:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already added UK distributors and information on Maxxine page but can you help me out by checking any grammar? 2A02:C7C:5ADE:9E00:193C:7D18:3E71:7298 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abigail_(2024_film) for my confusion regarding this movie. 190.194.188.69 (talk) 21:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why the "vampire black comedy horror film" edit got removed but why was the "American splatter films" category got removed? Radio Silence stated the movie is their most bloody. Ddg1208gaming (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem to be the main focus on the story. WP:DEFINING Mike Allen 20:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that Greg Hill is missing from the cast list on the Wikipedia page. There’s quite a few articles of press with him discussing the movie so I was wondering if possibly you could add him to the cast list. Thank you so much. I would greatly appreciate it. Jonj123246 (talk) 23:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But he is credited in the main titles at the end right before Nick Offerman, and has a bigger role than some of the people listed on the Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:3759:94E0:50B4:965:8915:CD26 (talk) 01:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Greg Hill is in the main titles for the cast and his name appears right before Nick Offerman and he has a bigger role than some of the people listed on the Wikipedia page. Jonj123246 (talk) 01:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use the article talk page. I didn’t remove him. Mike Allen 08:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mike, Coyote vs. Acme's production section still has social media references, which are unreliable. Can you please remove all of the social media if there are no reliable third-party sources that have information related to further information about the description of the script and story? The Media Expert (talk) 00:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]