User talk:Meenakshi Rana

Hello, Meenakshi Rana, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Meenakshi Rana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Melcous (talk) 12:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Meenakshi Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melcous (talk) 12:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone explain me briefly why my userpage has been deleted? I am a blogger and want to write and edit on wikipedia.

You need to see this page and this page, as they will answer your question. Please let me know on my talk page here if you have any questions about the guideline pages I provided for you here. I'll be happy to answer them. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had done 2 minor edits yesterday in wikipedia articles. After some time they had disappear from the wikipedia page. Please explaing why? i hadn't got any notification . So i am confused that edits are under review?, has been deleted? or crossing the guidlines of wikipedia?Meenakshi Rana (talk) 09:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Meenakshi Rana[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chemical peel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chemical peel, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Melcous (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reply to Melcous
Thanks Sir for your guildlines. I were thinking minor change as a paragraph change, apologies for that. I will read all the guidelines before editing next time. 49.207.73.7 (talk) 06:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)User:Meenakshi Rana[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

WP:PSEUDOSCIENCE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jupiter in Astrology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Meenakshi Rana, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Berkowits Hair & Skin Clinic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 06:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Berkowits Hair & Skin Clinic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —PaleoNeonate – 09:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Meenakshi Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adityavagarwal (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Meenakshi Rana/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, On Page Optimization, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that various contributions you have attempted were unsuccessful (reverted or deleted). You may be wondering why. Please note that Wikipedia is not for promotion (WP:PROMOTION). Moreover, editors who edit in areas where they are working or have business interests are considered to have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). Those editors are discouraged from editing articles on those topics. Adding external links is also discouraged versus adding citations to reliable sources (WP:CITE, WP:RS).
Your user page was previously deleted by an administrator because it appeared to not be related to Wikipedia (WP:NOTWEBHOST). Some edits have also been automatically reverted by bots because they contained promotional external links, which is not allowed. I remember that your user page, before it was deleted, mentioned that you worked in search-engine-optimization. Wikipedia is not the place to add links in attempt to get more traffic.
What appears to be your most recent contribution, the new On Page Optimization page, is also likely about to get deleted: the Draft: space (WP:DRAFTS) or personal sandbox (WP:SANDBOX) should normally be used for such seminal articles, especially if they include no citations yet. Also, new articles should not duplicate existing ones (we have an existing search engine optimization article which could be improved instead).
Because you appear to have difficulty, I am posting below an invitation to the Teahouse, a place where new editors can obtain help from more experienced editors. It also has previous discussion archives which answer many commonly asked questions. I hope this helps, —PaleoNeonate – 14:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Meenakshi Rana, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

—PaleoNeonate – 14:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meenakshi Rana. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]