User talk:MaurizioCarelli
Welcome!
Hi MaurizioCarelli! I noticed your contributions to Laser harp and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! – voidxor 00:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MaurizioCarelli. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Laser harp, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. — voidxor 23:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for advicing me about COI, but I just added a reference on a topic written almost 12 years ago (not by me but speaking of my person of course since I am the inventor) about the invention of the bicolour laser harp. Since the invention changed the way to play laser harps around the world (you can find the same description in many languages verions on wikipedia) and since someone else adviced the a reference was needed in the description >I undid and added that reference. I had the bicoulour idea in 2008 and I called the machine Kromalaser. I am not interested after 14 years in advertising the Kromalaser (as other people is doing with their brand in the same wikipedia page lying on informations...), but I think that it is not fair to delete the paragraph about the invention and the improvement I made on the original instrument. since then all laser harps made in the world use my idea to distinguish tomic and diatonic by colour. So please I promis not to edit by myself the page again, but please put back the paragraph that was there since 12 years or suggest me what is the most correct thing to do to put it back. Best wishes. As you can understand I am an inventor, not a wikipedia expert at all. MaurizioCarelli (talk) 13:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Your claim that it was just there and you did not add it is absolutely a lie, as evidenced here: [1]. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia (and we do need all of the help we can get), but editing in areas that you have a COI is absolutely off limits so please stop adding, re-adding, and expanding anything that has to do with you, your businesses, or your inventions. Thank you. — voidxor 01:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I don't see a reason to be so rude with me. I am not lying, my name was there since 2011 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laser_harp&oldid=412797386). You cited a post from 2018 in which I just "Restored The bi-colour laser harp section, since is an important improvement in history of laser harps". My name was there before my edit. I wish you could keep on talking being not offensive in future.
- Next, this is and encyclopaedia, so if someone makes and important improvement like I did in history of laser harps using two different colours for tonic and diatonic notes, I guess the name should be cited. I think you can do the right thing.
- Best
- M.C. MaurizioCarelli (talk) 09:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not being rude; I just caught you in a lie. I don't care if you were the first to put it there or the second, you're clearly not here to build an encyclopedia.
- You trying to school me about how "this is and encyclopedia" is humorous. I've been working for 19 years and 36,000 edits to improve this encyclopedia, whereas you have been here for 6 years and made only 6 edits—all of which are geared toward your own self promotion.
- What's "the right thing"? Is it what you want me to do? Your opinion? Your shameless self promotion? I've already pointed you to the COI policy. You should have never edited in an area in which you have a conflict, and conflicts need to be declared on your user page. The policy states that but you haven't done it yet. — voidxor 13:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was following this discussion. Actually Mr Carelli is right instead.
- His name is there since 2011. Please here the link.
- [2]https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arpa_laser&oldid=45528294
- I hope you will come to a friendly solution. No one is lying no one is rude. TormyVanCool (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Your claim that it was just there and you did not add it is absolutely a lie, as evidenced here: [1]. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia (and we do need all of the help we can get), but editing in areas that you have a COI is absolutely off limits so please stop adding, re-adding, and expanding anything that has to do with you, your businesses, or your inventions. Thank you. — voidxor 01:21, 2 March 2024 (UTC)